ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

Related questions











Question 171 - 200-201 discussion

Report
Export

Refer to the exhibit.

An analyst received this alert from the Cisco ASA device, and numerous activity logs were produced. How should this type of evidence be categorized?

A.

indirect

Answers
A.

indirect

B.

circumstantial

Answers
B.

circumstantial

C.

corroborative

Answers
C.

corroborative

D.

best

Answers
D.

best

Suggested answer: B

Explanation:

The alert from the Cisco ASA device and the numerous activity logs are examples of circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference or deduction to connect it to a conclusion of fact, such as a security incident or an attack. Circumstantial evidence does not directly prove the fact in question, but rather suggests or implies it. In this case, the alert and the logs indicate that a TCP connection attempt was denied by an access group, but they do not directly prove that an attack occurred or who was behind it. There could be other explanations for the denied connection, such as a misconfiguration, a network error, or a legitimate request. Therefore, this type of evidence is circumstantial and requires further investigation and analysis to confirm or rule out the possibility of an attack.Reference:=Circumstantial evidence - Wikipedia;Circumstantial Evidence - Definition, Examples, Cases, Processes;Understanding Cisco Cybersecurity Operations Fundamentals (CBROPS) - Cisco, page 92.

asked 07/10/2024
Gokul Kalaiselvi Loganathan
47 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first