ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

Related questions











Question 448 - CISA discussion

Report
Export

An IS auditor identifies that a legacy application to be decommissioned in three months cannot meet the security requirements established by the current policy. What is the BEST way (or the auditor to address this issue?

A.
Recommend the application be patched to meet requirements.
Answers
A.
Recommend the application be patched to meet requirements.
B.
Inform the IT director of the policy noncompliance.
Answers
B.
Inform the IT director of the policy noncompliance.
C.
Verify management has approved a policy exception to accept the risk.
Answers
C.
Verify management has approved a policy exception to accept the risk.
D.
Take no action since the application will be decommissioned in three months.
Answers
D.
Take no action since the application will be decommissioned in three months.
Suggested answer: C

Explanation:

The best way for the auditor to address this issue is to verify management has approved a policy exception to accept the risk. A policy exception is a formal authorization that allows a deviation from the established policy requirements for a specific situation or period of time. A policy exception should be based on a risk assessment that evaluates the impact and likelihood of the potential threats and vulnerabilities, as well as the cost and benefit of the alternative controls. A policy exception should also be documented, approved, and monitored by management.

Recommending the application be patched to meet requirements is not the best way for the auditor to address this issue. Patching the application may not be feasible, cost-effective, or timely, given that the application will be decommissioned in three months. Patching the application may also introduce new risks or errors that could affect the functionality or performance of the application.

Informing the IT director of the policy noncompliance is not the best way for the auditor to address this issue. Informing the IT director of the policy noncompliance may not resolve the issue or mitigate the risk, especially if the IT director is already aware of the situation and has decided to accept it. Informing the IT director of the policy noncompliance may also create unnecessary conflict or tension between the auditor and the auditee.

Taking no action since the application will be decommissioned in three months is not the best way for the auditor to address this issue. Taking no action may expose the organization to significant risks or consequences, such as data breaches, regulatory fines, or reputational damage, if the application is compromised or exploited by malicious actors. Taking no action may also violate the auditor's professional standards and responsibilities, such as due care, objectivity, and reporting.

ISACA, CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2019, p. 289

ISACA, CISA Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription

Cybersecurity Engineering for Legacy Systems: 6 Recommendations - SEI Blog

How to Secure Your Company's Legacy Applications - iCorps

asked 18/09/2024
Spandana Gangavaram
32 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first