ExamGecko
Search Search Login
Home Home / Amazon / MLS-C01
Question list
Search
Search

List of questions

Search
Open VPLUS File
Convert VPLUS to PDF

Related questions

A Machine Learning Specialist is using Apache Spark for pre-processing training data As part of the Spark pipeline, the Specialist wants to use Amazon SageMaker for training a model and hosting it Which of the following would the Specialist do to integrate the Spark application with SageMaker? (Select THREE)
IT leadership wants Jo transition a company's existing machine learning data storage environment to AWS as a temporary ad hoc solution The company currently uses a custom software process that heavily leverages SOL as a query language and exclusively stores generated csv documents for machine learning The ideal state for the company would be a solution that allows it to continue to use the current workforce of SQL experts The solution must also support the storage of csv and JSON files, and be able to query over semi-structured data The following are high priorities for the company: * Solution simplicity * Fast development time * Low cost * High flexibility What technologies meet the company's requirements?
A machine learning specialist stores IoT soil sensor data in Amazon DynamoDB table and stores weather event data as JSON files in Amazon S3. The dataset in DynamoDB is 10 GB in size and the dataset in Amazon S3 is 5 GB in size. The specialist wants to train a model on this data to help predict soil moisture levels as a function of weather events using Amazon SageMaker. Which solution will accomplish the necessary transformation to train the Amazon SageMaker model with the LEAST amount of administrative overhead?
A data engineer needs to provide a team of data scientists with the appropriate dataset to run machine learning training jobs. The data will be stored in Amazon S3. The data engineer is obtaining the data from an Amazon Redshift database and is using join queries to extract a single tabular dataset. A portion of the schema is as follows: ...traction Timestamp (Timeslamp) ...JName(Varchar) ...JNo (Varchar) Th data engineer must provide the data so that any row with a CardNo value of NULL is removed. Also, the TransactionTimestamp column must be separated into a TransactionDate column and a isactionTime column Finally, the CardName column must be renamed to NameOnCard. The data will be extracted on a monthly basis and will be loaded into an S3 bucket. The solution must minimize the effort that is needed to set up infrastructure for the ingestion and transformation. The solution must be automated and must minimize the load on the Amazon Redshift cluster Which solution meets these requirements?
A data scientist receives a collection of insurance claim records. Each record includes a claim ID. the final outcome of the insurance claim, and the date of the final outcome. The final outcome of each claim is a selection from among 200 outcome categories. Some claim records include only partial information. However, incomplete claim records include only 3 or 4 outcome ...gones from among the 200 available outcome categories. The collection includes hundreds of records for each outcome category. The records are from the previous 3 years. The data scientist must create a solution to predict the number of claims that will be in each outcome category every month, several months in advance. Which solution will meet these requirements?
A company is planning a marketing campaign to promote a new product to existing customers. The company has data (or past promotions that are similar. The company decides to try an experiment to send a more expensive marketing package to a smaller number of customers. The company wants to target the marketing campaign to customers who are most likely to buy the new product. The experiment requires that at least 90% of the customers who are likely to purchase the new product receive the marketing materials. ...company trains a model by using the linear learner algorithm in Amazon SageMaker. The model has a recall score of 80% and a precision of 75%. ...should the company retrain the model to meet these requirements?
A real estate company wants to create a machine learning model for predicting housing prices based on a historical dataset. The dataset contains 32 features. Which model will meet the business requirement?
An e-commerce company needs a customized training model to classify images of its shirts and pants products The company needs a proof of concept in 2 to 3 days with good accuracy Which compute choice should the Machine Learning Specialist select to train and achieve good accuracy on the model quickly?
Amazon Connect has recently been tolled out across a company as a contact call center The solution has been configured to store voice call recordings on Amazon S3 The content of the voice calls are being analyzed for the incidents being discussed by the call operators Amazon Transcribe is being used to convert the audio to text, and the output is stored on Amazon S3 Which approach will provide the information required for further analysis?
A Machine Learning Specialist is using Amazon Sage Maker to host a model for a highly available customer-facing application. The Specialist has trained a new version of the model, validated it with historical data, and now wants to deploy it to production To limit any risk of a negative customer experience, the Specialist wants to be able to monitor the model and roll it back, if needed What is the SIMPLEST approach with the LEAST risk to deploy the model and roll it back, if needed?

Question 41 - MLS-C01 discussion

Report
Export

A company that runs an online library is implementing a chatbot using Amazon Lex to provide book recommendations based on category. This intent is fulfilled by an AWS Lambda function that queries an Amazon DynamoDB table for a list of book titles, given a particular category. For testing, there are only three categories implemented as the custom slot types: 'comedy,' 'adventure,'' and 'documentary.''

A machine learning (ML) specialist notices that sometimes the request cannot be fulfilled because Amazon Lex cannot understand the category spoken by users with utterances such as 'funny,' 'fun,' and 'humor.' The ML specialist needs to fix the problem without changing the Lambda code or data in DynamoDB.

How should the ML specialist fix the problem?

A.
Add the unrecognized words in the enumeration values list as new values in the slot type.
Answers
A.
Add the unrecognized words in the enumeration values list as new values in the slot type.
B.
Create a new custom slot type, add the unrecognized words to this slot type as enumeration values, and use this slot type for the slot.
Answers
B.
Create a new custom slot type, add the unrecognized words to this slot type as enumeration values, and use this slot type for the slot.
C.
Use the AMAZON.SearchQuery built-in slot types for custom searches in the database.
Answers
C.
Use the AMAZON.SearchQuery built-in slot types for custom searches in the database.
D.
Add the unrecognized words as synonyms in the custom slot type.
Answers
D.
Add the unrecognized words as synonyms in the custom slot type.
Suggested answer: D

Explanation:

The best way to fix the problem without changing the Lambda code or data in DynamoDB is to add the unrecognized words as synonyms in the custom slot type. This way, Amazon Lex can resolve the synonyms to the corresponding slot values and pass them to the Lambda function. For example, if the slot type has a value ''comedy'' with synonyms ''funny'', ''fun'', and ''humor'', then any of these words entered by the user will be resolved to ''comedy'' and the Lambda function can query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in that category. Adding synonyms to the custom slot type can be done easily using the Amazon Lex console or API, and does not require any code changes.

The other options are not correct because:

Option A: Adding the unrecognized words in the enumeration values list as new values in the slot type would not fix the problem, because the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table are not aware of these new values. The Lambda function would not be able to query the DynamoDB table for the book titles in the new categories, and the request would still fail. Moreover, adding new values to the slot type would increase the complexity and maintenance of the chatbot, as the Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would have to be updated accordingly.

Option B: Creating a new custom slot type, adding the unrecognized words to this slot type as enumeration values, and using this slot type for the slot would also not fix the problem, for the same reasons as option A. The Lambda function and the DynamoDB table would not be able to handle the new slot type and its values, and the request would still fail. Furthermore, creating a new slot type would require more effort and time than adding synonyms to the existing slot type.

Option C: Using the AMAZON.SearchQuery built-in slot types for custom searches in the database is not a suitable approach for this use case. The AMAZON.SearchQuery slot type is used to capture free-form user input that corresponds to a search query. However, this slot type does not perform any validation or resolution of the user input, and passes the raw input to the Lambda function. This means that the Lambda function would have to handle the logic of parsing and matching the user input to the DynamoDB table, which would require changing the Lambda code and adding more complexity to the solution.

References:

Custom slot type - Amazon Lex

Using Synonyms - Amazon Lex

Built-in Slot Types - Amazon Lex

Show Answer
asked 16/09/2024
Marcelo I Sotelo S
36 questions
PreviousPreviousNextNext
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first

ExamGecko

Copyright @2023 ExamGecko | All right reserved

Mail us: [email protected]
About us
Contact us
Twitter X
Facebook
Medium
Convert VPLUS to PDF
Open VPLUS files Easily and Quickly
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Terms