Question 666 - SAA-C03 discussion

The correct solution is to create an Object Lambda Access Point and an AWS Lambda function that redacts the PII when the function reads the file. This way, the company can use the S3 Object Lambda feature to modify the S3 object content on the fly, without creating a copy or changing the original object. The external service provider can access the Object Lambda Access Point and get the redacted version of the file. This solution has the least operational overhead because it does not require any additional storage, processing, or synchronization. The solution also scales automatically with the number of customer conversations and the demand from the external service provider. The other options are incorrect because:

Option B is using a batch process on an EC2 instance to read, redact, and write the files to a different S3 bucket. This solution has more operational overhead because it requires managing the EC2 instance, the batch process, and the additional S3 bucket. It also introduces latency and inconsistency between the original and the redacted files.

Option C is using a web application on an EC2 instance to present, redact, and download the files. This solution has more operational overhead because it requires managing the EC2 instance, the web application, and the download process. It also exposes the original files to the web application, which increases the risk of leaking the PII.

Option D is using a DynamoDB table and a Lambda function to store the non-PII data from the files. This solution has more operational overhead because it requires managing the DynamoDB table, the Lambda function, and the data transformation. It also changes the format and the structure of the original files, which may affect the quality control process.

S3 Object Lambda

Object Lambda Access Point

Lambda function