ExamGecko
Search Search Login
Home Home / Salesforce / Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I
Question list
Search
Search

List of questions

Search
Open VPLUS File
Convert VPLUS to PDF

Related questions

An XA transaction Is being configured that involves a JMS connector listening for Incoming JMS messages. What is the meaning of the timeout attribute of the XA transaction, and what happens after the timeout expires?
An external API frequently invokes an Employees System API to fetch employee data from a MySQL database. The architect must design a caching strategy to query the database only when there Is an update to the Employees table or else return a cached response in order to minimize the number of redundant transactions being handled by the database.
Refer to the exhibit. A Mule 4 application has a parent flow that breaks up a JSON array payload into 200 separate items, then sends each item one at a time inside an Async scope to a VM queue. A second flow to process orders has a VM Listener on the same VM queue. The rest of this flow processes each received item by writing the item to a database. This Mule application is deployed to four CloudHub workers with persistent queues enabled. What message processing guarantees are provided by the VM queue and the CloudHub workers, and how are VM messages routed among the CloudHub workers for each invocation of the parent flow under normal operating conditions where all the CloudHub workers remain online?
What approach configures an API gateway to hide sensitive data exchanged between API consumers and API implementations, but can convert tokenized fields back to their original value for other API requests or responses, without having to recode the API implementations?
An insurance company is using a CIoudHub runtime plane. As a part of requirement, email alert should be sent to internal operations team every time of policy applied to an API instance is deleted As an integration architect suggest on how this requirement be met?
An organization is evaluating using the CloudHub shared Load Balancer (SLB) vs creating a CloudHub dedicated load balancer (DLB). They are evaluating how this choice affects the various types of certificates used by CloudHub deplpoyed Mule applications, including MuleSoft-provided, customer-provided, or Mule application-provided certificates. What type of restrictions exist on the types of certificates that can be exposed by the CloudHub Shared Load Balancer (SLB) to external web clients over the public internet?
An Order microservice and a Fulfillment microservice are being designed to communicate with their dients through message-based integration (and NOT through API invocations). The Order microservice publishes an Order message (a kind of command message) containing the details of an order to be fulfilled. The intention is that Order messages are only consumed by one Mute application, the Fulfillment microservice. The Fulfilment microservice consumes Order messages, fulfills the order described therein, and then publishes an OrderFulfilted message (a kind of event message). Each OrderFulfilted message can be consumed by any interested Mule application, and the Order microservice is one such Mute application. What is the most appropriate choice of message broker(s) and message destination(s) in this scenario?
An external REST client periodically sends an array of records in a single POST request to a Mule application API endpoint. The Mule application must validate each record of the request against a JSON schema before sending it to a downstream system in the same order that it was received in the array Record processing will take place inside a router or scope that calls a child flow. The child flow has its own error handling defined. Any validation or communication failures should not prevent further processing of the remaining records. To best address these requirements what is the most idiomatic(used for it intended purpose) router or scope to used in the parent flow, and what type of error handler should be used in the child flow?
An organization is migrating all its Mule applications to Runtime Fabric (RTF). None of the Mule applications use Mule domain projects. Currently, all the Mule applications have been manually deployed to a server group among several customer hosted Mule runtimes. Port conflicts between these Mule application deployments are currently managed by the DevOps team who carefully manage Mule application properties files. When the Mule applications are migrated from the current customer-hosted server group to Runtime Fabric (RTF), fo the Mule applications need to be rewritten and what DevOps port configuration responsibilities change or stay the same?
An organization uses a set of customer-hosted Mule runtimes that are managed using the Mulesoft-hosted control plane. What is a condition that can be alerted on from Anypoint Runtime Manager without any custom components or custom coding?

Question 46 - Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I discussion

Report
Export

A Mule application is being designed to do the following:

Step 1: Read a SalesOrder message from a JMS queue, where each SalesOrder consists of a header and a list of SalesOrderLineltems.

Step 2: Insert the SalesOrder header and each SalesOrderLineltem into different tables in an RDBMS.

Step 3: Insert the SalesOrder header and the sum of the prices of all its SalesOrderLineltems into a table In a different RDBMS.

No SalesOrder message can be lost and the consistency of all SalesOrder-related information in both RDBMSs must be ensured at all times.

What design choice (including choice of transactions) and order of steps addresses these requirements?

A.
1) Read the JMS message (NOT in an XA transaction) 2) Perform BOTH DB inserts in ONE DB transaction 3) Acknowledge the JMS message
Answers
A.
1) Read the JMS message (NOT in an XA transaction) 2) Perform BOTH DB inserts in ONE DB transaction 3) Acknowledge the JMS message
B.
1) Read the JMS message (NOT in an XA transaction) 2) Perform EACH DB insert in a SEPARATE DB transaction 3) Acknowledge the JMS message
Answers
B.
1) Read the JMS message (NOT in an XA transaction) 2) Perform EACH DB insert in a SEPARATE DB transaction 3) Acknowledge the JMS message
C.
1) Read the JMS message in an XA transaction 2) In the SAME XA transaction, perform BOTH DB inserts but do NOT acknowledge the JMS message
Answers
C.
1) Read the JMS message in an XA transaction 2) In the SAME XA transaction, perform BOTH DB inserts but do NOT acknowledge the JMS message
D.
1) Read and acknowledge the JMS message (NOT in an XA transaction) 2) In a NEW XA transaction, perform BOTH DB inserts
Answers
D.
1) Read and acknowledge the JMS message (NOT in an XA transaction) 2) In a NEW XA transaction, perform BOTH DB inserts
Suggested answer: A

Explanation:

Option A says 'Perform EACH DB insert in a SEPARATE DB transaction'. In this case if first DB insert is successful and second one fails then first insert won't be rolled back causing inconsistency. This option is ruled out.

Option D says Perform BOTH DB inserts in ONE DB transaction.

Rule of thumb is when one or more DB connections are required we must use XA transaction as local transactions support only one resource. So this option is also ruled out.

Option B acknowledges the before DB processing, so message is removed from the queue. In case of system failure at later point, message can't be retrieved.

Option C is Valid: Though it says 'do not ack JMS message', message will be auto acknowledged at the end of transaction. Here is how we can ensure all components are part of XA transaction: https://docs.mulesoft.com/jms-connector/1.7/jms-transactions

Additional Information about transactions:

XA Transactions - You can use an XA transaction to group together a series of operations from multiple transactional resources, such as JMS, VM or JDBC resources, into a single, very reliable, global transaction.

The XA (eXtended Architecture) standard is an X/Open group standard which specifies the interface between a global transaction manager and local transactional resource managers.

The XA protocol defines a 2-phase commit protocol which can be used to more reliably coordinate and sequence a series of 'all or nothing' operations across multiple servers, even servers of different types

Use JMS ack if

-- Acknowledgment should occur eventually, perhaps asynchronously

-- The performance of the message receipt is paramount

-- The message processing is idempotent

-- For the choreography portion of the SAGA pattern

Use JMS transactions

-- For all other times in the integration you want to perform an atomic unit of work

-- When the unit of work comprises more than the receipt of a single message

-- To simply and unify the programming model (begin/commit/rollback)

Show Answer
asked 23/09/2024
Abigail Bormann
40 questions
PreviousPreviousNextNext
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first

ExamGecko

Copyright @2023 ExamGecko | All right reserved

Mail us: [email protected]
About us
Contact us
Twitter X
Facebook
Medium
Convert VPLUS to PDF
Open VPLUS files Easily and Quickly
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Terms