ExamGecko
Search Search Login
Home Home / Salesforce / Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I
Question list
Search
Search

List of questions

Search
Open VPLUS File
Convert VPLUS to PDF

Related questions

An XA transaction Is being configured that involves a JMS connector listening for Incoming JMS messages. What is the meaning of the timeout attribute of the XA transaction, and what happens after the timeout expires?
An external API frequently invokes an Employees System API to fetch employee data from a MySQL database. The architect must design a caching strategy to query the database only when there Is an update to the Employees table or else return a cached response in order to minimize the number of redundant transactions being handled by the database.
An insurance company is using a CIoudHub runtime plane. As a part of requirement, email alert should be sent to internal operations team every time of policy applied to an API instance is deleted As an integration architect suggest on how this requirement be met?
An Order microservice and a Fulfillment microservice are being designed to communicate with their dients through message-based integration (and NOT through API invocations). The Order microservice publishes an Order message (a kind of command message) containing the details of an order to be fulfilled. The intention is that Order messages are only consumed by one Mute application, the Fulfillment microservice. The Fulfilment microservice consumes Order messages, fulfills the order described therein, and then publishes an OrderFulfilted message (a kind of event message). Each OrderFulfilted message can be consumed by any interested Mule application, and the Order microservice is one such Mute application. What is the most appropriate choice of message broker(s) and message destination(s) in this scenario?
Refer to the exhibit. A Mule 4 application has a parent flow that breaks up a JSON array payload into 200 separate items, then sends each item one at a time inside an Async scope to a VM queue. A second flow to process orders has a VM Listener on the same VM queue. The rest of this flow processes each received item by writing the item to a database. This Mule application is deployed to four CloudHub workers with persistent queues enabled. What message processing guarantees are provided by the VM queue and the CloudHub workers, and how are VM messages routed among the CloudHub workers for each invocation of the parent flow under normal operating conditions where all the CloudHub workers remain online?
An external REST client periodically sends an array of records in a single POST request to a Mule application API endpoint. The Mule application must validate each record of the request against a JSON schema before sending it to a downstream system in the same order that it was received in the array Record processing will take place inside a router or scope that calls a child flow. The child flow has its own error handling defined. Any validation or communication failures should not prevent further processing of the remaining records. To best address these requirements what is the most idiomatic(used for it intended purpose) router or scope to used in the parent flow, and what type of error handler should be used in the child flow?
What approach configures an API gateway to hide sensitive data exchanged between API consumers and API implementations, but can convert tokenized fields back to their original value for other API requests or responses, without having to recode the API implementations?
An organization is evaluating using the CloudHub shared Load Balancer (SLB) vs creating a CloudHub dedicated load balancer (DLB). They are evaluating how this choice affects the various types of certificates used by CloudHub deplpoyed Mule applications, including MuleSoft-provided, customer-provided, or Mule application-provided certificates. What type of restrictions exist on the types of certificates that can be exposed by the CloudHub Shared Load Balancer (SLB) to external web clients over the public internet?
A Mule application is being designed To receive nightly a CSV file containing millions of records from an external vendor over SFTP, The records from the file need to be validated, transformed. And then written to a database. Records can be inserted into the database in any order. In this use case, what combination of Mule components provides the most effective and performant way to write these records to the database?
An organization is migrating all its Mule applications to Runtime Fabric (RTF). None of the Mule applications use Mule domain projects. Currently, all the Mule applications have been manually deployed to a server group among several customer hosted Mule runtimes. Port conflicts between these Mule application deployments are currently managed by the DevOps team who carefully manage Mule application properties files. When the Mule applications are migrated from the current customer-hosted server group to Runtime Fabric (RTF), fo the Mule applications need to be rewritten and what DevOps port configuration responsibilities change or stay the same?

Question 94 - Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I discussion

Report
Export

The implementation of a Process API must change. What is a valid approach that minimizes the impact of this change on API clients?

A.
Implement required changes to the Process API implementation so that whenever possible, the Process API's RAML definition remains unchanged
Answers
A.
Implement required changes to the Process API implementation so that whenever possible, the Process API's RAML definition remains unchanged
B.
Update the RAML definition of the current Process API and notify API client developers by sending them links to the updated RAML definition
Answers
B.
Update the RAML definition of the current Process API and notify API client developers by sending them links to the updated RAML definition
C.
Postpone changes until API consumers acknowledge they are ready to migrate to a new Process API or API version
Answers
C.
Postpone changes until API consumers acknowledge they are ready to migrate to a new Process API or API version
D.
Implement the Process API changes in a new API implementation, and have the old API implementation return an HTTP status code 301 - Moved Permanently to inform API clients they should be calling the new API implementation
Answers
D.
Implement the Process API changes in a new API implementation, and have the old API implementation return an HTTP status code 301 - Moved Permanently to inform API clients they should be calling the new API implementation
Suggested answer: A

Explanation:

* Option B shouldn't be used unless extremely needed, if RAML is changed, client needs to accommodate changes. Question is about minimizing impact on Client. So this is not a valid choice.

* Option C isn't valid as Business can't stop for consumers acknowledgment.

* Option D again needs Client to accommodate changes and isn't viable option.

* Best choice is A where RAML definition isn't changed and underlined functionality is changed without any dependency on client and without impacting client.

Show Answer
asked 23/09/2024
souhaib chabchoub
37 questions
PreviousPreviousNextNext
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first

ExamGecko

Copyright @2023 ExamGecko | All right reserved

Mail us: [email protected]
About us
Contact us
Twitter X
Facebook
Medium
Convert VPLUS to PDF
Open VPLUS files Easily and Quickly
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Terms