ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

List of questions

Search

Related questions











Question 152 - NCS-Core discussion

Report
Export

A consultant creates a four-node AHV cluster with two 1GbE (eth0, etc1) and two 10GbE (eth2, eth3) NICs per node. The 1GbE NICs will not be placed into service, but the customer wants the network to be preconfigured for their eventual use.

The consultant removes the 1GbE NIC from the default bond and creates a second bridge(br1), but is unable to add the 1GbE NIC using the below command:

manage_ovs --bridge_name br1 --interfaces 1g --bond_name br1-up update_uplinks

Which parameter is missing from this command?

A.
--bond_duplex full
Answers
A.
--bond_duplex full
B.
--require_link=false
Answers
B.
--require_link=false
C.
--interfaces eth0
Answers
C.
--interfaces eth0
D.
--bridge_duplex full
Answers
D.
--bridge_duplex full
Suggested answer: C

Explanation:

The manage_ovs command requires specific interface names to be added or configured under a bridge or bond. In the provided scenario, the command failed because it generically referred to '1g' which is not a recognized interface or valid parameter syntax. For the command to work correctly, each individual interface name must be specified. In this case, the missing parameter was the specific interface name 'eth0' for one of the 1GbE NICs. The corrected command should explicitly include the NIC names, e.g., --interfaces eth0,eth1.

Reference:

Nutanix Bible

Nutanix University NCS-Core Materials

asked 23/09/2024
test fdf
47 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first