ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

Question 52 - CISM discussion

Report
Export

The MOST important reason for having an information security manager serve on the change management committee is to:

A.
identify changes to the information security policy.
Answers
A.
identify changes to the information security policy.
B.
ensure that changes are tested.
Answers
B.
ensure that changes are tested.
C.
ensure changes are properly documented.
Answers
C.
ensure changes are properly documented.
D.
advise on change-related risk.
Answers
D.
advise on change-related risk.
Suggested answer: D

Explanation:

The most important reason for having an information security manager serve on the change management committee is to advise on change-related risk.Change management is the process of planning, implementing, and controlling changes to the organization's IT systems, processes, or services, in order to achieve the desired outcomes and minimize the negative impacts1.Change-related risk is the possibility of adverse consequences or events resulting from the changes, such as security breaches, system failures, data loss, compliance violations, or customer dissatisfaction2.

The information security manager is responsible for ensuring that the organization's information assets are protected from internal and external threats, and that the information security objectives and requirements are aligned with the business goals and strategies3. Therefore, the information security manager should serve on the change management committee to advise on change-related risk, and to ensure that the changes are consistent with the information security policy, standards, and best practices. The information security manager can also help to identify and assess the potential security risks and impacts of the changes, and to recommend and implement appropriate security controls and measures to mitigate them.The information security manager can also help to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness and performance of the changes, and to identify and resolve any security issues or incidents that may arise from the changes4.

The other options are not as important as advising on change-related risk, because they are either more specific, limited, or dependent on the information security manager's role. Identifying changes to the information security policy is a task that the information security manager may perform as part of the change management process, but it is not the primary reason for serving on the change management committee.The information security policy is the document that defines the organization's information security principles, objectives, roles, and responsibilities, and it should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect the changes in the organization's environment, needs, and risks5. However, identifying changes to the information security policy is not as important as advising on change-related risk, because the policy is a high-level document that does not provide specific guidance or details on how to implement or manage the changes. Ensuring that changes are tested is a quality assurance activity that the change management committee may perform or oversee as part of the change management process, but it is not the primary reason for having an information security manager on the committee. Testing is the process of verifying and validating that the changes meet the expected requirements, specifications, and outcomes, and that they do not introduce any errors, defects, or vulnerabilities. However, ensuring that changes are tested is not as important as advising on change-related risk, because testing is a technical or operational activity that does not address the strategic or holistic aspects of change-related risk. Ensuring changes are properly documented is a governance activity that the change management committee may perform or oversee as part of the change management process, but it is not the primary reason for having an information security manager on the committee. Documentation is the process of recording and maintaining the information and evidence related to the changes, such as the change requests, approvals, plans, procedures, results, reports, and lessons learned.However, ensuring changes are properly documented is not as important as advising on change-related risk, because documentation is a procedural or administrative activity that does not provide any analysis or evaluation of change-related risk.Reference=1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.52: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.53: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.14: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.55: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.3 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.5 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 2.5

asked 01/10/2024
MARCOS ALAMOS
33 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first