ExamGecko
Search Search Login
Home Home / IAPP / CIPP-A
Question list
Search
Search

List of questions

Search
Open VPLUS File
Convert VPLUS to PDF

Related questions

Based on the model contract released by the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PDPC), Hong Kong, all of the following sections are recommended to be put into a contract to address Ordinance 33 (Data transfer/export) of Hong Kong's Personal Data Privacy Ordinance (PDPO) EXCEPT?
Hong Kong's Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO) was primarily inspired by which of the following?
In 2015, Section 66A of India's IT Act was ruled unconstitutional. What did this section previously prohibit?
The judgement of the Supreme Court in 2017 in the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India held that?
SCENARIO – Please use the following to answer the next question: Zoe is the new Compliance Manager for the Star Hotel Group, which has five hotels across Hong Kong and China. On her first day, she does an inspection of the largest property, StarOne. She starts with the hotel reception desk. Zoe sees the front desk assistant logging in to a database as he is checking in a guest. The hotel manager, Bernard, tells her that all guest data, including passport numbers, credit card numbers, home address, mobile number and other information associated with a guest's stay is held in a database. Bernard tells her not to worry about the security of the database because it is operated for Star Hotels by a local service provider called HackProof, who therefore are responsible for all the guest data. Zoe notices what looks like a CCTV camera in the corner of the reception area. Bernard says they record all activity in the lobby. In fact, last Tuesday he had received a data access request from a lawyer requesting a copy of footage of all lobby activity for the preceding month. The lawyer's covering letter said that his client has never visited the hotel herself, but is investigating whether her husband has been doing so without her knowledge. Zoe and Bernard head up to the hotel spa. The spa is independently owned by a company called Relax Ltd. Bernard explains that Relax Ltd is a small company and, as they don't have their own database, they transfer data about the spa guests to StarOne staff so that they can upload the data into the HackProof system. Relax Ltd staff can then login and review their guest data as needed. Zoe asks more about the HackProof system. Bernard tells her that the server for the Hong Kong hotels is in Hong Kong, but there is a server in Shenzhen that has a copy of all the Hong Kong hotel data and supports the properties in China. The data is in China for back up purposes and also is accessible by staff in the China hotels so they can better service guests who visit their hotels in both territories. Members of Relax Ltd's staff are concerned about the data sharing with StarOne. How should Zoe respond to their concerns?
Which jurisdiction was the first to consider IP addresses to be personal information?
SCENARIO – Please use the following to answer the next question: Zoe is the new Compliance Manager for the Star Hotel Group, which has five hotels across Hong Kong and China. On her first day, she does an inspection of the largest property, StarOne. She starts with the hotel reception desk. Zoe sees the front desk assistant logging in to a database as he is checking in a guest. The hotel manager, Bernard, tells her that all guest data, including passport numbers, credit card numbers, home address, mobile number and other information associated with a guest's stay is held in a database. Bernard tells her not to worry about the security of the database because it is operated for Star Hotels by a local service provider called HackProof, who therefore are responsible for all the guest data. Zoe notices what looks like a CCTV camera in the corner of the reception area. Bernard says they record all activity in the lobby. In fact, last Tuesday he had received a data access request from a lawyer requesting a copy of footage of all lobby activity for the preceding month. The lawyer's covering letter said that his client has never visited the hotel herself, but is investigating whether her husband has been doing so without her knowledge. Zoe and Bernard head up to the hotel spa. The spa is independently owned by a company called Relax Ltd. Bernard explains that Relax Ltd is a small company and, as they don't have their own database, they transfer data about the spa guests to StarOne staff so that they can upload the data into the HackProof system. Relax Ltd staff can then login and review their guest data as needed. Zoe asks more about the HackProof system. Bernard tells her that the server for the Hong Kong hotels is in Hong Kong, but there is a server in Shenzhen that has a copy of all the Hong Kong hotel data and supports the properties in China. The data is in China for back up purposes and also is accessible by staff in the China hotels so they can better service guests who visit their hotels in both territories. HackProof reports to Zoe that a copy of the entire guest database has been exfiltrated by a hacker. What is Zoe's best course of action?
Besides the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), which of the following is a potential source of privacy protection for Singapore citizens?
SCENARIO – Please use the following to answer the next question: Fitness For Everyone ("FFE") is a gym on Hong Kong Island that is affiliated with a network of gyms throughout Southeast Asia. When prospective members of the gym stop in, call in or submit an inquiry online, they are invited for a free trial session. At first, the gym asks prospective clients only for basic information: a full name, contact number, age and their Hong Kong ID number, so that FFE's senior trainer Kelvin can reach them to arrange their first appointment. One day, a potential customer named Stephen took a tour of the gym with Kelvin and then decided to join FFE for six months. Kelvin pulled out a registration form and explained FFE's policies, placing a circle next to the part that read "FEE and affiliated third parties" may market new products and services using the contact information provided on the form to Stephen "for the duration of his membership." Stephen asked if he could opt-out of the marketing communications. Kelvin shrugged and said that it was a standard part of the contract and that most gyms have it, but that even so Kelvin's manager wanted the item circled on all forms. Stephen agreed, signed the registration form at the bottom of the page, and provided his credit card details for a monthly gym fee. He also exchanged instant messenger/cell details with Kelvin so that they could communicate about personal training sessions scheduled to start the following week. After attending the gym consistently for six months, Stephen's employer transferred him to another part of the Island, so he did not renew his FFE membership. One year later, Stephen started to receive numerous text messages each day from unknown numbers, most marketing gym or weight loss products. Suspecting that FFE shared his information widely, he contacted his old FFE branch and asked reception if they still had his information on file. They did, but offered to delete it if he wished. He was told FFE's process to purge his information from all the affiliated systems might take 8 to 12 weeks. FFE also informed him that Kelvin was no longer employed by FFE and had recently started working for a competitor. FFE believed that Kelvin may have shared the mobile contact details of his clients with the new gym, and apologized for this inconvenience. Assuming that Kelvin received a commission for sharing his former client list with the new employer, and the new employer used Stephen's data to engage in direct marketing to Stephen, which of the following penalties could Kelvin face under Part VI A of the Ordinance?
Which of the following entities do NOT fall under India's Right to Information Act of 2005?

Question 10 - CIPP-A discussion

Report
Export

How was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Maneka Gandhi v Union of India case significant to Indian law?

A.

It expanded the interpretation of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Answers
A.

It expanded the interpretation of right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

B.

It established that privacy is a fundamental right granted by the Constitution under Article 21.

Answers
B.

It established that privacy is a fundamental right granted by the Constitution under Article 21.

C.

It upheld that the impounding of passports for "public interest" is allowable under Section 10(3)(c) of the Passports Act.

Answers
C.

It upheld that the impounding of passports for "public interest" is allowable under Section 10(3)(c) of the Passports Act.

D.

It ruled that under Article 32 of the Constitution individuals may file writ petitions when they feel their rights were violated.

Answers
D.

It ruled that under Article 32 of the Constitution individuals may file writ petitions when they feel their rights were violated.

Suggested answer: D

Explanation:

Reference: https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609abd1e4b014971140d6b0

Show Answer
asked 22/11/2024
Aleksandar Burdin
26 questions
PreviousPreviousNextNext
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first

ExamGecko

Copyright @2023 ExamGecko | All right reserved

Mail us: [email protected]
About us
Contact us
Twitter X
Facebook
Medium
Convert VPLUS to PDF
Open VPLUS files Easily and Quickly
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Terms