List of questions
Related questions
Question 47 - CIPP-A discussion
In 2013-14, the Indian Supreme Court ruled in Puttaswamy and Anr. vs Union of India that requiring a Unique Identification Number was unconstitutional if what?
A.
It was restricted to residents of India.
B.
It was necessary for proving citizenship.
C.
It was required in order to obtain government services.
D.
It was used to gather information to discriminate against minorities.
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by
Leave a comment first