ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

Related questions







SCENARIO Please use the following to answer the next question; Jane is a U.S. citizen and a senior software engineer at California-based Jones Labs, a major software supplier to the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies Jane's manager, Patrick, is a French citizen who has been living in California for over a decade. Patrick has recently begun to suspect that Jane is an insider secretly transmitting trade secrets to foreign intelligence. Unbeknownst to Patrick, the FBI has already received a hint from anonymous whistleblower, and jointly with the National Secunty Agency is investigating Jane's possible implication in a sophisticated foreign espionage campaign Ever since the pandemic. Jane has been working from home. To complete her daily tasks she uses her corporate laptop, which after each togin conspicuously provides notice that the equipment belongs to Jones Labs and may be monitored according to the enacted privacy policy and employment handbook Jane also has a corporate mobile phone that she uses strictly for business, the terms of which are defined in her employment contract and elaborated upon in her employee handbook. Both the privacy policy and the employee handbook are revised annually by a reputable California law firm specializing in privacy law. Jane also has a personal iPhone that she uses for private purposes only. Jones Labs has its primary data center in San Francisco, which is managed internally by Jones Labs engineers The secondary data center, managed by Amazon AWS. is physically located in the UK for disaster recovery purposes. Jones Labs' mobile devices backup is managed by a mid-sized mobile delense company located in Denver, which physically stores the data in Canada to reduce costs. Jones Labs MS Office documents are securely stored in a Microsoft Office 365 data Under Section 702 of F1SA. The NSA may do which of the following without a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant?

SCENARIO Please use the following to answer the next question; Jane is a U.S. citizen and a senior software engineer at California-based Jones Labs, a major software supplier to the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies Jane's manager, Patrick, is a French citizen who has been living in California for over a decade. Patrick has recently begun to suspect that Jane is an insider secretly transmitting trade secrets to foreign intelligence. Unbeknownst to Patrick, the FBI has already received a hint from anonymous whistleblower, and jointly with the National Secunty Agency is investigating Jane's possible implication in a sophisticated foreign espionage campaign Ever since the pandemic. Jane has been working from home. To complete her daily tasks she uses her corporate laptop, which after each togin conspicuously provides notice that the equipment belongs to Jones Labs and may be monitored according to the enacted privacy policy and employment handbook Jane also has a corporate mobile phone that she uses strictly for business, the terms of which are defined in her employment contract and elaborated upon in her employee handbook. Both the privacy policy and the employee handbook are revised annually by a reputable California law firm specializing in privacy law. Jane also has a personal iPhone that she uses for private purposes only. Jones Labs has its primary data center in San Francisco, which is managed internally by Jones Labs engineers The secondary data center, managed by Amazon AWS. is physically located in the UK for disaster recovery purposes. Jones Labs' mobile devices backup is managed by a mid-sized mobile delense company located in Denver, which physically stores the data in Canada to reduce costs. Jones Labs MS Office documents are securely stored in a Microsoft Office 365 data When storing Jane's fingerprint for remote authentication. Jones Labs should consider legality issues under which of the following9



Question 191 - CIPP-US discussion

Report
Export

Which of the following data elements is most likely to be subject to comprehensive state data security and privacy laws?

A.

Account holders' social security numbers, maintained by a bank.

Answers
A.

Account holders' social security numbers, maintained by a bank.

B.

Users' sexual orientations, maintained by a social media website

Answers
B.

Users' sexual orientations, maintained by a social media website

C.

Individual drivers' license numbers, maintained by a state agency.

Answers
C.

Individual drivers' license numbers, maintained by a state agency.

D.

Contact details of individuals who report emergencies, maintained by local authorities

Answers
D.

Contact details of individuals who report emergencies, maintained by local authorities

Suggested answer: A

Explanation:

Social security numbers (SSNs) are one of the most sensitive types of personally identifiable information (PII) and are subject to comprehensive data security and privacy laws at both the federal and state levels. Banks, as financial institutions, are subject to strict regulations under laws like the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and state privacy laws regarding the safeguarding of sensitive data like SSNs.

Why Social Security Numbers are Most Likely to Be Covered:

SSNs are a high-value target for identity theft, making their protection a focus of numerous privacy and data security laws.

Federal laws like GLBA and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) impose strict data security requirements on financial institutions.

State laws, such as those in California, often require businesses to protect SSNs and notify individuals in the event of a breach involving sensitive information.

Explanation of Options:

A. Account holders' social security numbers, maintained by a bank: This is correct because SSNs are consistently protected under comprehensive laws at both the federal and state levels.

B. Users' sexual orientations, maintained by a social media website: While sexual orientation may be considered sensitive data under certain laws (e.g., GDPR in the EU), U.S. privacy laws do not consistently regulate this information.

C. Individual drivers' license numbers, maintained by a state agency: While some states regulate drivers' license data, this information is not comprehensively covered under state privacy laws.

D. Contact details of individuals who report emergencies, maintained by local authorities: This information is regulated in limited circumstances (e.g., Freedom of Information Act or public records laws) but is not subject to comprehensive state privacy laws.

Reference from CIPP/US Materials:

GLBA and FCRA: Highlight the importance of safeguarding sensitive financial information such as SSNs.

State Data Breach Notification Laws: Many states explicitly list SSNs as a protected data element.

asked 22/11/2024
Saley SEINI
34 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first