Question 18 - JN0-636 discussion

According to the output shown in the exhibit, which is a security flow session on an SRX Series device, the correct statement is that the local gateway address for the IPsec tunnel is 10.20.20.2. This is indicated by the line In: 10.20.20.2/2060 -> 10.20.20.1/3382, which shows that the source IP address of the incoming packet is 10.20.20.2, which is the local gateway address of the IPsec tunnel.

The destination IP address of the incoming packet is 10.20.20.1, which is the remote gateway address of the IPsec tunnel.

The following statements are incorrect or not supported by the output:

The remote gateway address for the IPsec tunnel is 10.20.20.2. This is false, as explained above. The remote gateway address for the IPsec tunnel is 10.20.20.1, not 10.20.20.2.

The session information indicates that the IPsec tunnel has not been established. This is false, as the output shows that there are two active sessions with the communication tag IPSec VPN: vpn1, which indicates that the IPsec tunnel has been established and is named vpn11.

NAT is being used to change the source address of outgoing packets. This is not supported by the output, as there is no indication of NAT being applied to the outgoing packets. The source IP address of the outgoing packet is 192.168.1.1, which is the same as the source IP address of the original packet. If NAT was being used, the source IP address of the outgoing packet would be different from the source IP address of the original packet.

Reference: 1: show security flow session - Technical Documentation - Support - Juniper Networks