ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

List of questions

Search

Related questions

Question 6 - JN0-683 discussion

Report
Export

You are implementing seamless stitching between two data centers and have a proposed configuration for a border leaf device.

In this scenario, which two statements are correct? {Choose two.)

A.
The translation-vni must match in both data centers.
Answers
A.
The translation-vni must match in both data centers.
B.
The translation-vni must be different in each data center.
Answers
B.
The translation-vni must be different in each data center.
C.
The ESI must be different in each data center.
Answers
C.
The ESI must be different in each data center.
D.
The ESI must match in both data centers.
Answers
D.
The ESI must match in both data centers.
Suggested answer: B, D

Explanation:

Understanding Seamless Stitching:

Seamless stitching is used in EVPN to interconnect two data centers, allowing for consistent Layer 2 and Layer 3 connectivity across them. This is often achieved by translating VNIs (Virtual Network Identifiers) between the data centers.

Translation-VNI:

Option B: The translation VNI must be different in each data center to ensure that traffic can be correctly routed and distinguished as it crosses between the data centers. This differentiation helps to maintain the integrity of the traffic flows and prevents any potential overlap or conflict in VNIs.

Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI):

Option D: The ESI must match in both data centers to ensure that the same Ethernet segment (which could be multihomed) is recognized consistently across the data centers. Matching ESIs are crucial for maintaining a unified view of the Ethernet segment across the interconnected fabric.

Conclusion:

Option B: Correct---Translation VNIs must be unique to each data center for proper traffic distinction.

Option D: Correct---Matching ESIs are necessary to maintain consistent Ethernet segment identification across both data centers.

asked 18/09/2024
Janina Loveria
39 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first