Broadcom 250-586 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 2

When configuring DNS change detection for SONAR, two available options are Block and Log. These options allow administrators to define how SONAR should respond to unexpected or suspicious DNS changes.

Block: This option enables SONAR to immediately block DNS changes that it detects as potentially malicious, preventing suspicious DNS redirections that could expose endpoints to threats like phishing or malware sites.

Log: Selecting Log allows SONAR to record DNS changes without taking direct action. This option is useful for monitoring purposes, providing a record of changes for further analysis.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (Active Response) and Option C (Quarantine) are generally associated with threat responses but are not specific to DNS change detection.

Option E (Trace) is not an available response option for DNS changes in SONAR.

Therefore, the correct options for configuring DNS change detected for SONAR are Block and Log.

In the Assess phase, the gathered business and technical objectives should be documented as they provide the foundation for assessing the solution's effectiveness and alignment with organizational goals.

Documenting Objectives: Proper documentation ensures that the objectives are clearly understood and preserved for reference throughout the implementation process, aligning all stakeholders on the expected outcomes.

Proceeding with the Assessment: Once documented, these objectives guide the evaluation of the solution's performance, identifying any areas that may require adjustments to meet the organization's needs.

Ensuring Traceability: Documented objectives offer traceability, allowing each stage of the implementation to reference back to these goals for consistent alignment.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (ranking them) is useful but does not substitute the documentation and assessment process.

Option C (discussing only with IT staff) limits stakeholder involvement.

Option D (creating separate reports) is redundant and not typically required at this stage.

The correct approach is to document the objectives and proceed with the assessment of the solution's alignment with these goals.

In the SES Complete Hybrid Architecture, the Cloud Bridge Connector serves a critical role in enabling secure communication between on-premise and cloud components:

Synchronization Role: The Cloud Bridge Connector allows the on-premise Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) Manager to securely communicate and synchronize data with the Integrated Cyber Security Manager in the cloud environment.

Secure Communication over TCP Port 443: The connector uses TCP port 443 for secure HTTPS communication, which is crucial for transmitting sensitive security data and maintaining synchronization between the on-premise and cloud environments.

Hybrid Architecture Support: This synchronization capability is essential in hybrid architectures, where a mix of on-premise and cloud resources work together to provide a cohesive security solution.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (managing on-premise clients through SQL Server) is unrelated to the Cloud Bridge Connector's function.

Option C (offloading updates via TCP ports 7070 and 7078) pertains to update distribution, not synchronization.

Option D (providing content updates on the SEP client) is also outside the primary role of the Cloud Bridge Connector.

The correct answer is that the Cloud Bridge Connector is used to synchronize communications between the on-premise SEP Manager and the Integrated Cyber Security Manager over TCP port 443.

The Configuration Design section in the SES Complete Solution Design provides a summary of the features and functions that will be implemented in the deployment. This section outlines the specific elements that make up the security solution, detailing what will be configured to meet the customer's requirements.

Summary of Features and Functions: This section acts as a blueprint, summarizing the specific features (e.g., malware protection, firewall settings, intrusion prevention) and configurations that need to be deployed.

Guidance for Implementation: By listing the features and functions, the Configuration Design serves as a reference for administrators, guiding the deployment and ensuring all necessary components are included.

Ensuring Solution Completeness: The summary helps verify that the solution covers all planned security aspects, reducing the risk of missing critical configurations during deployment.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (testing scenarios) is part of the Test Plan, not the Configuration Design.

Option C (solution validation) is conducted after configuration and is typically part of testing.

Option D (base architecture and infrastructure requirements) would be found in the Infrastructure Design section.

Therefore, the Configuration Design section provides a summary of the features and functions to be implemented.

In the Implement phase of the SES Complete Implementation framework, two key actions are typically executed:

Execution of a Pilot Deployment: This action is crucial to test the solution in a controlled subset of the customer environment, ensuring that the solution design meets functional and security requirements before a full-scale rollout. The Pilot Deployment validates configurations and allows adjustments as needed based on real-world performance.

Implementation of the Solution Configuration Design: This involves setting up and configuring all aspects of the solution according to the predefined Solution Configuration Design. This step ensures that all features and functionalities are properly implemented, configured, and aligned with the solution's objectives.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (presentation of the SES Complete Solution Proposal) and Option D (preparing a project plan) are tasks completed earlier in the planning phase.

Option E (gathering of business drivers and technical requirements) is part of the Assess phase, where requirements are collected and documented.

Thus, Pilot Deployment and Solution Configuration Design implementation are the correct actions for the Implement phase.

A single site design in a SEP on-premise architecture is often chosen when centralized reporting without delay is a primary requirement. This design allows for real-time access to data and reports, as all data processing occurs within a single, centralized server environment.

Centralized Data Access: A single site design ensures that data is readily available without the delays that might occur with multi-site replication or distributed environments.

Efficient Reporting: With all logs, alerts, and reports centralized, administrators can quickly access real-time information, which is crucial for rapid response and monitoring.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (geographic coverage) would typically favor a multi-site setup.

Option B (legal constraints on log retention) does not specifically benefit from a single site design.

Option D (control over WAN usage) is more relevant to distributed environments where WAN traffic management is necessary.

Therefore, centralized reporting with no delay is a key reason for opting for a single site design.

For an organization with remote locations and minimal bandwidth that wants a content distribution solution without configuring an internal LiveUpdate server, using a Group Update Provider (GUP) is the best choice.

Efficient Content Distribution: The GUP serves as a local distribution point within each remote location, reducing the need for each client to connect directly to the central management server for updates. This minimizes WAN bandwidth usage.

No Need for Internal LiveUpdate Server: The GUP can pull updates from the central SEP Manager and then distribute them to local clients, eliminating the need for a dedicated internal LiveUpdate server and optimizing bandwidth usage in remote locations.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (External LiveUpdate) would involve each client connecting to Symantec's servers, which could strain bandwidth.

Option B (Management Server) directly distributing updates is less efficient for remote locations with limited bandwidth.

Option C (Intelligent Updater) is typically used for manual updates and is not practical for ongoing, automated content distribution.

Thus, the Group Update Provider is the optimal solution for remote locations with limited bandwidth that do not want to set up an internal LiveUpdate server.

In a multi-site SEP Manager implementation, if one SEP Manager replication partner fails, the clients for that site automatically connect to the remaining SEP Managers. This setup provides redundancy, ensuring that client devices maintain protection and receive policy updates even if one manager becomes unavailable.

Redundancy in Multi-Site Setup: Multi-site SEP Manager deployments are designed with redundancy, allowing clients to failover to alternative SEP Managers within the environment if their primary replication partner fails.

Continuous Client Protection: With this failover, managed devices continue to be protected and can still receive updates and policies from other SEP Managers.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (delayed replication) and Option C (discontinued protection) are incorrect as replication stops only for the failed manager, and client protection continues through other managers.

Option D suggests data retention locally without failover, which is not the standard approach in a multi-site setup.

Therefore, the correct answer is that clients for the affected site connect to the remaining SEP Managers, ensuring ongoing protection.

Researching the customer before arriving onsite is important to understand the customer's specific needs and how the technology can address those needs. This preparation enables the consultant to make relevant connections between the customer's unique environment and the capabilities of the SES solution.

Understanding Customer Needs: By researching the customer, consultants can gain insight into specific security challenges, organizational goals, and any unique requirements.

Tailoring the Approach: This understanding allows consultants to tailor their approach, present the technology in a way that aligns with the customer's needs, and ensure the solution is relevant to the customer's environment.

Building a Collaborative Relationship: Demonstrating knowledge of the customer's challenges and goals helps establish trust and shows that the consultant is invested in providing value.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (reviewing documentation) and Option B (understanding recent challenges) are steps in preparation but do not encompass the full reason.

Option C (aligning expectations) is a part of understanding customer needs but is not the primary purpose.

The best answer is to understand the customer and connect their needs to the technology.