Home / F5 / 301b

F5 301b Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 14

Question list

List of questions

Question 131

(0)

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting virtual server 10.0.0.1:443 residing on VLAN vlan301. The web application is accessed via www.example.com . The LTM Specialist wants to save a packet capture wi

Question 132

(0)

In preparation for a maintenance task, an LTM Specialist performs a 'Force to Standby' on LTM device Unit 1. LTM device Unit 2 becomes active as expected. The maintenance task requires the reboot of

Question 133

(0)

A high-availability (HA) pair configuration uses only the hardwire serial cable connection to determine device state. A power outage occurs to the PDU powering the active unit. The standby unit take

Question 134

(0)

While investigating the cause of a device failover, an LTM Specialist discovers the following events in /var/log/ltm: 01010029:5: Clock advanced by 518 ticks 01010029:5: Clock advanced by 505 tick

Question 135

(0)

A failover event is recorded in the log messages: Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 01140029:5: HA proc_running tmm fails action is go offline and down links. Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice

Question 136

(0)

An LTM Specialist has just manually failed the active LTM device over to the standby LTM device. The LTM Specialist notices the newly active LTM device is NOT currently receiving traffic. The LTM Sp

Question 137

(0)

-- Exhibit -- -- Exhibit -- Refer to the exhibit. An LTM Specialist is reviewing the 'test' partition. Which objects, in order, can be removed from the partition?

Question 138

(0)

-- Exhibit -- -- Exhibit -- Refer to the exhibit. Which two items can be consolidated to simplify the LTM configuration? (Choose two.)

Question 139

(0)

-- Exhibit -- -- Exhibit -- Refer to the exhibit. Which pool can be removed without affecting client traffic?

Question 140

(0)

-- Exhibit -- -- Exhibit -- Refer to the exhibit. Which profile could be removed or changed on this virtual server to reduce CPU load on the LTM device without increasing server side bandwidth

Related questions

The LTM Specialist is writing a custom HTTP monitor for a web application and has viewed the content by accessing the site directly via their browser. The monitor continually fails. The monitor configuration is: ltm monitor http /Common/exampleComMonitor { defaults-from /Common/http destination *:* interval 5 recv 'Recent Searches' send 'GET /app/feed/current\?uid=20145 HTTP/1.1 \\r\\nHost : www.example.com\\r\\nAccept-EncodinG. gzip, deflate \\r\\nConnection : close\\r\\n \\r\\n' time-until-up 0 timeout 16 } A trace shows the following request and response: Request: GET /app/feed/current?uid=20145 HTTP/1.1 Host www.example.com Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate Connection: close Response: HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily Date Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:45:52 GMT Server Apache Location https://example.com/login.jsp Content-Encoding gzip Content-Type text/html;charset=UTF-8 Set-CookiE. JSESSIONID=261EFFBDA8EC3036FBCC22D991AC6835; Path=/app/feed/current?uid=20145 What is the problem?

An LTM Specialist configures the following iRule on an LTM device: when HTTP_REQUEST { if {[string tolower [HTTP::uri]] contains '/URI1/' } { pool Pool1 } elseif {[string tolower [HTTP::uri]] contains '/URI2/' } { pool Pool2 } elseif {[string tolower [HTTP::uri]] contains '/URI3/' } { pool Pool3 } else { pool Pool4} } Given the following request: http://www.example.comURI1/index.html?fu=bar&pass=1234 Which pool will be selected by the iRule?

An LTM Specialist configures an HTTP monitor as follows: ltm monitor http stats_http_monitor { defaults-from http destination *:* interval 5 recv 'Health check: OK' send 'GET /stats/stats.html HTTP/1.1\\r \\nHost : www.example.com\\r\\nAccept-EncodinG. gzip, deflate \\r\\nConnection : close\\r\\n \\r\\n' time-until-up 0 timeout 16 } The monitor is marking all nodes as down. A trace of the HTTP conversation shows the following: GET /stats/stats.html HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.com Accept-EncodinG. gzip, deflate Connection: close HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required DatE. Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:38:56 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) WWW-AuthenticatE. Basic realm='Please enter your credentials' Content-LengtH. 480 Connection: close Content-TypE. text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Which action will resolve the problem?

-- Exhibit -- -- Exhibit -- Refer to the exhibit. An administrator created a monitor to a pool member web server, which resulted in a pool member that is marked red. The administrator knows the web server is working when it is accessed from another computer. What should the administrator do to correct the problem?

Which three HTTP headers allow an application server to determine the client's language compatibility, browser, operating system type, and compression compatibility? (Choose three.)

set hsl [HSL::open -proto UDP -pool syslog_server_pool] HSL::send $hsl '<190> [HTTP::host] from [whereis [IP::client_addr] country continent state city zip] , IP: [IP::client_addr]' What do the following iRule commands do when they are used in the same iRule?

What is the effect of an iRule error such as referencing an undefined variable?

An LTM HTTP pool has an associated monitor that sends a string equal to 'GET /test.html'. Which two configurations could an LTM Specialist implement to allow server administrators to disable their pool member servers without logging into the LTM device? (Choose two.)

An LTM device is serving an FTP virtual server that has three pool members. The FTP pool members are monitored via TCP port 21. Customers are reporting that they are able to log in, but are sometimes unable to upload files to the server. Which monitor should the LTM Specialist configure to verify that the servers can handle file uploads?

-- Exhibit -- -- Exhibit -- Refer to the exhibit. An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting a new HTTP monitor on a pool. The pool member is functioning correctly when accessed directly through a browser, although the monitor is marking the member as down. As part of the troubleshooting, the LTM Specialist has captured the monitor traffic via tcpdump. How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

Question 131

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting virtual server 10.0.0.1:443 residing on VLAN vlan301. The web application is accessed via www.example.com. The LTM Specialist wants to save a packet capture with complete decrypted payload for external analysis.

Which command should the LTM Specialist execute on the LTM device command line interface?

tcpdump -vvv -s 0 'host 10.0.0.1 and port 443' -w /var/tmp/trace.cap

tcpdump -vvv -s 0 -ni vlan301 'host 10.0.0.1 and port 443' -w /var/tmp/trace.cap

ssldump -Aed -k /config/filestore/files_d/Common_d/certificate_key_d/:Common:www.example.com.key_1 > /var/tmp/trace.cap

ssldump -Aed -ni vlan301 -k /config/filestore/files_d/Common_d/certificate_key_d/:Common:www.example.com.key_1 > /var/tmp/trace.cap

Show Answer Comment (0)

Question 132

In preparation for a maintenance task, an LTM Specialist performs a 'Force to Standby' on LTM device Unit 1. LTM device Unit 2 becomes active as expected. The maintenance task requires the reboot of Unit 1. Shortly after the reboot is complete, the LTM Specialist discovers that Unit 1 has become active and Unit 2 has returned to standby.

What would cause this behavior?

Unit 1 is set with the redundancy state preference of active in devices groups.

Unit 1 is set with the redundancy state preference of active in high availability.

A traffic group is configured with Auto Failback, and Unit 1 is the default device.

A device group is configured with Auto Failback, and Unit 1 is the default device.

Show Answer Comment (0)

Question 133

A high-availability (HA) pair configuration uses only the hardwire serial cable connection to determine device state. A power outage occurs to the PDU powering the active unit. The standby unit takes over the active role as expected.

How is the peer unit able to determine the active unit is unavailable?

voltage loss on serial cable

no data stream received on serial port

no response on management interface

no heartbeat packets received on self IPs

Show Answer Comment (0)

Question 134

While investigating the cause of a device failover, an LTM Specialist discovers the following events in /var/log/ltm:

01010029:5: Clock advanced by 518 ticks

01010029:5: Clock advanced by 505 ticks

01010029:5: Clock advanced by 590 ticks

01010029:5: Clock advanced by 568 ticks

01010029:5: Clock advanced by 1681 ticks

01010029:5: Clock advanced by 6584 ticks

01140029:5: HA daemon_heartbeat tmm fails action is failover and restart.

010c0026:5: Failover condition, active attempting to go standby.

Which issue caused the failover?

NTP being out of sync

TMM being descheduled

VLAN Fail-safe heartbeats

HA missing heartbeat packets

Show Answer Comment (0)

Question 135

A failover event is recorded in the log messages:

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 01140029:5: HA proc_running tmm fails action is go offline and down links.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0050:5: Sod requests links down.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0054:5: Offline for traffic group /Common/traffic-group-1.

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c003e:5: Offline

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP notice logger: /usr/bin/tmipsecd --tmmcount 4 ==> /usr/bin/bigstart stop racoon

Jan 01 00:00:50 BIG-IP info lacpd[5502]: 01160016:6: Failover event detected. (Switchboard failsafe disabled while offline)

Jan 01 00:00:51 BIG-IP err bcm56xxd[5296]: 012c0010:3: Failover event detected. Marking external interfaces down. bsx.c(3633)

Jan 01 00:00:51 BIG-IP info bcm56xxd[5296]: 012c0015:6: Link: 1.1 is DOWN

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 0107143c:5: Connection to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 has been removed

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 0107143a:5: CMI reconnect timer: enabled

Jan 01 00:00:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 01071431:5: Attempting to connect to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 port 6699

What is the cause of the failover?

TMM failed, and VLAN fail-safe initiated the failover.

TMM failed, and system fail-safe initiated the failover.

Loss of connection to CMI peer 10.0.0.3 initiated the failover.

A switchboard failure caused system fail-safe to initiate the failover.

Show Answer Comment (0)

Question 136

An LTM Specialist has just manually failed the active LTM device over to the standby LTM device. The LTM Specialist notices the newly active LTM device is NOT currently receiving traffic. The LTM Specialist verifies the newly active device is responding to ARP but still no traffic is hitting the virtual servers. The LTM Specialist also notices that the virtual servers eventually start responding.

What should be added to the configuration to resolve the problem?

vlan failsafe

floating self IP

network failover

MAC masquerading

connection mirroring

Show Answer Comment (0)