Isaca CISA Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 46

Audit frameworks can assist the IS audit function by providing direction and information regarding the performance of audits. Audit frameworks are sets of standards, guidelines, and best practices that help IS auditors plan, conduct, and report on their audit engagements. Audit frameworks can help IS auditors ensure the quality, consistency, and professionalism of their audit work, as well as comply with the expectations and requirements of the stakeholders and regulators. Audit frameworks can also help IS auditors address the specific challenges and risks of auditing information systems and technology.

Defining the authority and responsibility of the IS audit function is not a way that audit frameworks can assist the IS audit function, but rather a way that the IS audit charter can assist the IS audit function. The IS audit charter is a document that defines the purpose, scope, objectives, and authority of the IS audit function within the organization. The IS audit charter can help IS auditors establish their role and position in relation to other functions and departments, as well as clarify their rights and obligations.

Providing details on how to execute the audit program is not a way that audit frameworks can assist the IS audit function, but rather a way that the audit methodology can assist the IS audit function. The audit methodology is a set of procedures and techniques that guide IS auditors in performing their audit tasks and activities. The audit methodology can help IS auditors apply a systematic and structured approach to their audit work, as well as use appropriate tools and methods to collect and analyze evidence.

Outlining the specific steps needed to complete audits is not a way that audit frameworks can assist the IS audit function, but rather a way that the audit plan can assist the IS audit function. The audit plan is a document that describes the scope, objectives, timeline, resources, and deliverables of a specific audit engagement. The audit plan can help IS auditors organize and manage their audit work, as well as communicate their expectations and responsibilities to the auditees.

ISACA, CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2019, p.511

Understanding Project Audit Frameworks - Wolters Kluwer2

How to Implement a Robust Audit Framework - Insights - Metricstream3

What Is The Internal Audit Function?An Accurate Definition Of The

The best process for continuous auditing for a large financial institution is validating access controls for real-time data systems. This is because access controls are critical for ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the financial data that is processed and transmitted by the real-time data systems. Real-time data systems are systems that provide timely and accurate information to support decision-making and transactions in a dynamic and complex environment. Examples of real-time data systems in the financial sector include payment systems, trading platforms, risk management systems, and fraud detection systems. Continuous auditing of access controls can help detect and prevent unauthorized access, data leakage, data manipulation, or data loss that could compromise the security, reliability, or compliance of the real-time data systems.

Testing encryption standards on the disaster recovery system is not the best process for continuous auditing for a large financial institution. Encryption standards are important for protecting the data stored or transmitted by the disaster recovery system, which is a system that provides backup and recovery capabilities in case of a disruption or disaster. However, testing encryption standards is not a continuous process, but rather a periodic or event-driven process that can be performed as part of the disaster recovery plan testing or validation.

Performing parallel testing between systems is not the best process for continuous auditing for a large financial institution. Parallel testing is a process of comparing the results of two or more systems that perform the same function or task, such as a new system and an old system, or a primary system and a backup system. Parallel testing can help verify the accuracy, consistency, and compatibility of the systems. However, parallel testing is not a continuous process, but rather a temporary or transitional process that can be performed as part of the system implementation or migration.

Validating performance of help desk metrics is not the best process for continuous auditing for a large financial institution. Help desk metrics are indicators that measure the efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of the help desk service, which is a service that provides technical support and assistance to the users of information systems and technology. Help desk metrics can include metrics such as response time, resolution time, customer satisfaction, and service level agreement (SLA) compliance. Validating performance of help desk metrics can help evaluate and improve the help desk service. However, validating performance of help desk metrics is not a continuous auditing process, but rather a continuous monitoring process that can be performed by the help desk management or quality assurance team.

All eyes on: Continuous auditing - KPMG Global1

Internal audit's role at financial institutions: PwC2

The Fed - Supervisory Policy and Guidance Topics - Large Banking ...3

Continuous Audit: Definition, Steps, Advantages and Disadvantages4

The best method to reduce the risk associated with the transition to a new system using technologies that are not compatible with the old system is parallel changeover. Parallel changeover is a method of system conversion that involves running both the old and the new systems simultaneously for a period of time, until the new system is verified to be working correctly and completely. Parallel changeover can help reduce the risk of data loss, errors, or disruptions that may occur due to the incompatibility of the technologies, as well as provide a backup option in case of failure or malfunction of the new system. Parallel changeover can also help users compare and validate the results of both systems, and facilitate their training and adaptation to the new system.

Modular changeover is a method of system conversion that involves replacing one module or component of the old system with a corresponding module or component of the new system at a time, until the entire system is replaced. Modular changeover can help reduce the complexity and scope of the conversion, as well as minimize the impact on the users and operations. However, modular changeover may not be feasible or effective when the technologies of the old and new systems are not compatible, as it may create integration or interoperability issues among the modules.

Phased operation is a method of system conversion that involves implementing the new system in stages or increments, each with a subset of functions or features, until the entire system is operational. Phased operation can help reduce the risk and cost of implementing a large and complex system, as well as allow for testing and feedback at each stage. However, phased operation may not be suitable or efficient when the technologies of the old and new systems are not compatible, as it may require extensive modifications or adaptations to enable partial functionality.

Pilot operation is a method of system conversion that involves implementing the new system in a limited or controlled environment, such as a department or a location, before rolling it out to the entire organization. Pilot operation can help test and evaluate the performance and usability of the new system, as well as identify and resolve any issues or problems before full-scale implementation. However, pilot operation may not be relevant or reliable when the technologies of the old and new systems are not compatible, as it may not reflect the actual conditions or challenges of operating both systems concurrently.

TRANSITION TO THE NEW SYSTEM - O'Reilly Media1

10 Challenges To Think About When Upgrading From Legacy Systems - Forbes

This is because privacy regulations are laws or rules that protect the personal information of individuals from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, or transfer by third parties. Payroll audit documentation may contain sensitive and confidential data, such as employee names, salaries, benefits, taxes, deductions, and bank accounts. If the audit management application is hosted by a third party in a different country, the organization may need to comply with the privacy regulations of both its own country and the host country, as well as any international or regional agreements or frameworks that apply. Privacy regulations may impose various requirements and obligations on the organization, such as obtaining consent from the data subjects, implementing appropriate security measures, notifying data breaches, and ensuring data quality and accuracy. Privacy regulations may also grant various rights to the data subjects, such as accessing, correcting, deleting, or transferring their data. Failing to comply with privacy regulations may expose the organization to significant risks and consequences, such as legal actions, fines, sanctions, reputational damage, or loss of trust.

Some examples of privacy regulations affecting the organization are:

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which is a comprehensive and strict privacy regulation that applies to any organization that processes personal data of individuals in the European Union (EU) or offers goods or services to them, regardless of where the organization or the data is located1.

The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which is a broad and influential privacy regulation that applies to any organization that collects personal information of California residents and meets certain thresholds of revenue, data volume, or data sharing2.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which is a sector-specific privacy regulation that applies to any organization that handles protected health information (PHI) of individuals in the United States, such as health care providers, health plans, or health care clearinghouses3.

Therefore, before using an audit management application hosted by a third party in a different country, the internal audit team should conduct a thorough assessment of the privacy regulations affecting the organization and ensure that they have adequate policies, procedures, and controls in place to comply with them.

The finding that should be of greatest concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk associated with end-user computing (EUC) in an organization is the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications. EUC applications are applications that are developed and maintained by end-users, rather than by IT professionals, to support their business functions and processes. Examples of EUC applications include spreadsheets, databases, reports, and scripts. The lack of defined criteria for EUC applications means that the organization does not have clear and consistent standards or guidelines to identify, classify, and manage EUC applications. This can lead to various risks, such as:

Inaccurate or unreliable data and results from EUC applications that are not validated, verified, or tested

Unauthorized or inappropriate access or use of EUC applications that are not secured, controlled, or monitored

Inconsistent or incompatible data and results from EUC applications that are not integrated, documented, or updated

Loss or corruption of data and results from EUC applications that are not backed up, recovered, or archived

Therefore, the IS auditor should be most concerned about the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications, as it can affect the quality, integrity, and availability of the EUC applications and the data they produce.

Insufficient processes to track ownership of each EUC application is a finding that should be of concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk associated with EUC in an organization, but it is not the greatest concern. The ownership of an EUC application refers to the person or group who is responsible for creating, maintaining, and using the EUC application. Insufficient processes to track ownership of each EUC application means that the organization does not have adequate mechanisms or records to identify and communicate who owns each EUC application. This can lead to risks, such as:

Lack of accountability or ownership for the quality and accuracy of the EUC application and its data

Lack of support or maintenance for the EUC application when the owner leaves or changes roles

Lack of awareness or training for the users of the EUC application on its purpose and functionality

However, these risks are less severe than those caused by the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications.

Insufficient processes to test for version control is a finding that should be of concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk associated with EUC in an organization, but it is not the greatest concern. Version control is a process that tracks and manages the changes made to an EUC application over time. Insufficient processes to test for version control means that the organization does not have adequate procedures or tools to ensure that the changes made to an EUC application are authorized, documented, and tested. This can lead to risks, such as:

Errors or inconsistencies in the data and results from different versions of the EUC application

Conflicts or confusion among the users of the EUC application on which version is current or correct

Loss or overwrite of data and results from previous versions of the EUC application

However, these risks are less severe than those caused by the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications.

Lack of awareness training for EUC users is a finding that should be of concern to an IS auditor assessing the risk associated with EUC in an organization, but it is not the greatest concern. Awareness training for EUC users is a process that educates and informs the users of the EUC applications on their roles, responsibilities, and risks. Lack of awareness training for EUC users means that the organization does not have adequate programs or materials to raise the knowledge and skills of the users on how to use and manage the EUC applications effectively and securely. This can lead to risks, such as:

Misuse or abuse of the EUC applications by users who are not aware of their impact or implications

Non-compliance or violation of policies or regulations by users who are not aware of their requirements or expectations

Dissatisfaction or frustration among users who are not aware of their benefits or limitations

However, these risks are less severe than those caused by the lack of defined criteria for EUC applications.

End-user computing - Wikipedia1

How to Manage the Risks Associated with End User Computing2

Managing end user computing risks - KPMG UK3

The best course of action for an IS auditor when an auditee is unable to close all audit recommendations by the time of the follow-up audit is to evaluate the residual risk due to open issues. Residual risk is the risk that remains after the implementation of controls or mitigating actions. Evaluating the residual risk due to open issues can help the IS auditor assess the impact and likelihood of the potential threats and vulnerabilities that have not been addressed by the auditee, as well as the adequacy and effectiveness of the existing controls or mitigating actions. Evaluating the residual risk due to open issues can also help the IS auditor prioritize and communicate the open issues to the auditee and other stakeholders, such as senior management or audit committee, and recommend appropriate actions or escalation procedures.

Ensuring the open issues are retained in the audit results is a course of action for an IS auditor when an auditee is unable to close all audit recommendations by the time of the follow-up audit, but it is not the best one. Ensuring the open issues are retained in the audit results can help the IS auditor document and report the status and progress of the audit recommendations, as well as provide a basis for future follow-up audits. However, ensuring the open issues are retained in the audit results does not provide an analysis or evaluation of the residual risk due to open issues, which is more important for informing decision-making and action-taking.

Terminating the follow-up because open issues are not resolved is not a course of action for an IS auditor when an auditee is unable to close all audit recommendations by the time of the follow-up audit, but rather a consequence or outcome of it. Terminating the follow-up because open issues are not resolved may indicate that the auditee has failed to comply with the agreed-upon actions or deadlines, or that the IS auditor has encountered significant obstacles or resistance from the auditee. Terminating the follow-up because open issues are not resolved may also trigger further actions or sanctions from the IS auditor or other authorities, such as issuing a qualified or adverse opinion, withholding certification, or imposing penalties.

Recommending compensating controls for open issues is not a course of action for an IS auditor when an auditee is unable to close all audit recommendations by the time of the follow-up audit, but rather a possible outcome or result of it. Compensating controls are alternative or additional controls that are implemented to reduce or eliminate the risk associated with a weakness or deficiency in another control. Recommending compensating controls for open issues may be appropriate when the auditee is unable to implement the original audit recommendations due to technical, operational, financial, or other constraints, and when the compensating controls can provide a similar or equivalent level of assurance. However, recommending compensating controls for open issues requires a prior evaluation of the residual risk due to open issues, which is more important for determining whether compensating controls are necessary and feasible.

Follow-up Audits - Canadian Audit and Accountability Foundation1

Conducting The Audit Follow-Up: When To Verify - The Auditor2

Internal Audit Follow Ups: Are They Really Worth The Effort

The best way to sanitize a hard disk for reuse to ensure the organization's information cannot be accessed is data wiping. Data wiping is a process that overwrites the data on the hard disk with random or meaningless patterns, making it unrecoverable by any software or hardware methods. Data wiping can provide a high level of security and assurance that the organization's information is permanently erased from the hard disk, and that it cannot be accessed by unauthorized parties or malicious actors.

Re-partitioning is not a way to sanitize a hard disk for reuse, but rather a way to organize the hard disk into different logical sections or volumes. Re-partitioning does not erase the data on the hard disk, but only changes the structure and allocation of the disk space. Re-partitioning may make the data inaccessible to the operating system, but not to other tools or methods that can scan or recover the data from the disk sectors.

Degaussing is a way to sanitize a hard disk for reuse, but only for magnetic hard disks, not solid state drives (SSDs). Degaussing is a process that exposes the hard disk to a strong magnetic field, which disrupts and destroys the magnetic alignment of the data on the disk platters. Degaussing can effectively erase the data on magnetic hard disks, but it can also damage or render unusable the electronic components of the hard disk, such as the read/write heads or circuit boards. Degaussing also does not work on SSDs, which store data using flash memory cells, not magnetic media.

Formatting is not a way to sanitize a hard disk for reuse, but rather a way to prepare the hard disk for use by an operating system. Formatting is a process that creates a file system on the hard disk, which defines how the data is stored and accessed on the disk. Formatting does not erase the data on the hard disk, but only deletes the file system metadata and marks the disk space as available for new data. Formatting may make the data invisible to the operating system, but not to other tools or methods that can restore or recover the data from the disk sectors.

How to Wipe A Hard Drive for Reuse?Check the Quickest Way to Wipe A Hard Drive - EaseUS1

HP PCs - Using Secure Erase or HP Disk Sanitizer2

HOW to QUICKLY and PERMANENTLY SANITIZE ANY DRIVE (SSD, USB thumb drive ...)

The most important thing for the IS auditor to determine in a post-implementation review of a recently purchased system is whether the user requirements were met. User requirements are the specifications and expectations of the users of the system, such as the features, functions, performance, quality, and security of the system. User requirements are usually defined and documented in the early stages of the system acquisition process, such as in the request for proposal (RFP) or the contract. User requirements are also used as the basis for testing and evaluating the system before and after implementation.

Determining whether the user requirements were met can help the IS auditor assess whether the system is fit for purpose and delivers value and benefits to the users and the organization. Determining whether the user requirements were met can also help the IS auditor identify any gaps, issues, or problems with the system that may affect its functionality, usability, or reliability. Determining whether the user requirements were met can also help the IS auditor provide feedback and recommendations for improvement or enhancement of the system.

Stakeholder expectations were identified is not the most important thing for the IS auditor to determine in a post-implementation review of a recently purchased system, but rather a prerequisite or input for it. Stakeholder expectations are the needs and wants of the various parties who have an interest or influence in the system, such as users, managers, customers, suppliers, regulators, or auditors. Stakeholder expectations are usually identified and analyzed in the initial stages of the system acquisition process, such as in the feasibility study or the business case. Stakeholder expectations are also used as inputs for defining and prioritizing the user requirements.

Test scenarios reflected operating activities is not the most important thing for the IS auditor to determine in a post-implementation review of a recently purchased system, but rather a factor or criterion for it. Test scenarios are sets of conditions or situations that are used to test and verify whether the system meets the user requirements. Test scenarios reflected operating activities means that test scenarios simulated or replicated real-world scenarios that occur during normal operations of business processes or functions that use or depend on the system. Test scenarios reflected operating activities can help ensure that test results are valid, reliable, and relevant.

Post Implementation Review: How to conduct and its Benefits1

Post-implementation reviews - Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet2

How To Conduct A Post Implementation Audit of Your Recently Installed System3

The greatest concern for an IS auditor evaluating the access controls for a shared customer relationship management (CRM) system is that audit logging is not enabled. Audit logging is a process that records and tracks the activities and events that occur on a system, such as who accessed what data, when, how, and why. Audit logging can help monitor and verify the compliance and effectiveness of the access controls, as well as detect and investigate any unauthorized or suspicious access or actions. Audit logging can also provide evidence and accountability for the security and integrity of the system and the data.

Without audit logging, the IS auditor would not be able to audit the access controls for the shared CRM system, as there would be no reliable or traceable records of the access history or patterns. Without audit logging, the organization would also not be able to identify or respond to any potential breaches or incidents that may compromise the confidentiality, availability, or accuracy of the CRM data. Without audit logging, the organization would also not be able to demonstrate or prove its compliance with any applicable policies, regulations, or standards that may require audit logging for CRM systems.

Single sign-on is not enabled is not a great concern for an IS auditor evaluating the access controls for a shared CRM system, but rather a potential improvement or enhancement. Single sign-on is a process that allows users to access multiple systems or applications with one set of credentials, such as a username and password. Single sign-on can help simplify and streamline the user experience, as well as reduce the risk of password fatigue or compromise. However, single sign-on is not a mandatory or essential requirement for access controls, and it may also introduce some challenges or risks, such as dependency on a single point of failure or vulnerability.

Security baseline is not consistently applied is not a great concern for an IS auditor evaluating the access controls for a shared CRM system, but rather a minor issue or gap. Security baseline is a set of minimum security standards or requirements that apply to a system or application, such as password policies, encryption protocols, or firewall rules. Security baseline can help ensure that the system or application meets a certain level of security and compliance. However, security baseline is not a sufficient or comprehensive measure for access controls, and it may also need to be customized or adjusted according to the specific needs and risks of each system or application.

Complex passwords are not required is not a great concern for an IS auditor evaluating the access controls for a shared CRM system, but rather a common practice or recommendation. Complex passwords are passwords that are composed of a combination of different types of characters, such as letters, numbers, symbols, and cases. Complex passwords can help prevent or deter brute-force attacks or guessing attempts by making the passwords harder to crack or predict. However, complex passwords are not a guarantee or guarantee of security, and they may also have some drawbacks or limitations, such as user inconvenience, memorability issues, or reuse across multiple systems or applications.

Customer Relationship Management Risks and Controls - CRM Simplified1

Customer relationship management: A guide - Zendesk2

How to Protect Your Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Data from Hackers3

What is CRM?| A Definition by Salesforce4