JN0-280: Data Center, Associate
Exam Number: JN0-280
Exam Name: Data Center, Associate
Length of test: 90 mins
Exam Format: Multiple-choice, Drag and Drop, and HOTSPOT questions.
Exam Language: English
Number of questions in the actual exam: 65 questions
Passing Score: 70%
Topics Covered:
-
Junos OS Fundamentals
-
Configuration and Management
-
Routing Fundamentals
-
Interface and VLAN Configuration
-
Security and Firewall Filters
-
Troubleshooting and Monitoring
This study guide should help you understand what to expect on the JN0-280 exam and includes a summary of the topics the exam might cover and links to additional resources. The information and materials in this document should help you focus your studies as you prepare for the exam.
Related questions
What are two device roles in a five-member Virtual Chassis? (Choose two.)
You are creating an IP fabric underlay and want to use OSPF as your routing protocol.
In this scenario, which statement is correct?
You want to minimize topology disruptions in your network when the rpd process restarts on a device. Which service would accomplish this task?
You are configuring an aggregate route. In this scenario, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
What is the primary purpose of an IRB Layer 3 interface?
Which statement is correct about aggregate routes?
The default next hop is discard.
The default next hop is readvertise.
The default next hop is resolve.
The default next hop is reject.
An aggregate route is a summarized route that is created by combining multiple specific routes into a single, broader route. In Junos OS, when an aggregate route is configured, its default next hop is set to reject.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
Aggregate Route:
Aggregate routes are used to reduce the size of routing tables by representing a collection of more specific routes with a single summary route. They help improve routing efficiency and scalability, especially in large networks.
Default Next Hop Behavior:
When you configure an aggregate route in Junos OS, it has a reject next hop by default.
The reject next hop means that if a packet matches the aggregate route but there is no more specific route in the routing table for that destination, the packet will be discarded, and an ICMP 'destination unreachable' message is sent to the source.
This behavior helps to prevent routing loops and ensures that traffic isn't forwarded to destinations for which there is no valid route.
Modifying Next Hop:
If needed, the next hop behavior of an aggregate route can be changed to discard (which silently drops the packet) or to another specific next hop. However, by default, the next hop is set to reject.
Juniper
Reference:
Junos Command: set routing-options aggregate route <route> reject to configure an aggregate route with a reject next hop.
Verification: Use show route to verify the presence and behavior of aggregate routes.
When troubleshooting an OSPF neighborship, you notice that the router stopped at the ExStart state. What is the cause of this result?
The priority is set to 255.
There is an interval timing mismatch.
There is an area ID mismatch.
There is an MTU mismatch.
When an OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) neighborship is stuck in the ExStart state, it usually points to a mismatch in Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) settings between two routers trying to establish the adjacency. The ExStart state is where OSPF routers negotiate the master-slave relationship and exchange DBD (Database Description) packets.
Step-by-Step Breakdown:
OSPF Neighbor States: OSPF goes through several states to establish an adjacency with a neighbor:
Down: No hello packets have been received.
Init: Hello packets are received, but bidirectional communication isn't confirmed.
2-Way: Bidirectional communication is established.
ExStart: The routers are negotiating who will be the master and who will be the slave, and begin to exchange DBD packets.
Exchange: The routers start exchanging the database information.
Loading: The routers process the Link-State Advertisements (LSAs).
Full: The adjacency is fully established.
MTU Mismatch Issue:
During the ExStart state, both OSPF routers must agree on their MTU values. If there is an MTU mismatch between the two routers, OSPF neighbors will fail to move from the ExStart to the Exchange state. The router with the larger MTU setting will not accept DBD packets from the router with a smaller MTU because the packets may exceed the smaller MTU size.
In Juniper devices, this behavior can be identified by examining the MTU settings using the show interfaces command and ensuring both routers have matching MTU configurations. To resolve this issue, either match the MTU settings on both routers or configure OSPF to ignore MTU mismatches using the command set protocols ospf ignore-mtu.
Juniper
Reference:
Junos Command: show ospf neighbor helps diagnose neighbor states.
MTU Adjustment: set interfaces <interface-name> mtu <size> can be used to set the MTU values correctly.
Exhibit:
How many stages are shown in the exhibit?
2
5
6
3
The exhibit shows a Folded IP Clos Architecture, which is also referred to as a 3-stage Clos network design. This architecture typically consists of two layers of switches:
Spine Layer: The top row of switches.
Leaf Layer: The bottom row of switches.
Step-by-Step Breakdown:
Clos Architecture:
A 3-stage Clos network has two types of devices: spine and leaf. In this design, each leaf switch connects to every spine switch, providing a high level of redundancy and load balancing.
Stage Explanation:
Stage 1: The first set of leaf switches.
Stage 2: The spine switches.
Stage 3: The second set of leaf switches.
The Folded Clos architecture shown here effectively 'folds' the 3-stage design by combining the ingress and egress leaf layers into one, reducing it to two visible layers, but still maintaining the overall 3-stage architecture.
Juniper
Reference:
IP Clos Architecture: The 3-stage Clos design is commonly used in modern data centers for high availability, redundancy, and scalability.
Exhibit:
Referring to the exhibit, which behavior does this configuration enable on the ge-0/0/1.0 interface?
Which signaling protocol is used for EVPN?
Question