ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

Related questions










SCENARIO Please use the following to answer the next question; Jane is a U.S. citizen and a senior software engineer at California-based Jones Labs, a major software supplier to the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies Jane's manager, Patrick, is a French citizen who has been living in California for over a decade. Patrick has recently begun to suspect that Jane is an insider secretly transmitting trade secrets to foreign intelligence. Unbeknownst to Patrick, the FBI has already received a hint from anonymous whistleblower, and jointly with the National Secunty Agency is investigating Jane's possible implication in a sophisticated foreign espionage campaign Ever since the pandemic. Jane has been working from home. To complete her daily tasks she uses her corporate laptop, which after each togin conspicuously provides notice that the equipment belongs to Jones Labs and may be monitored according to the enacted privacy policy and employment handbook Jane also has a corporate mobile phone that she uses strictly for business, the terms of which are defined in her employment contract and elaborated upon in her employee handbook. Both the privacy policy and the employee handbook are revised annually by a reputable California law firm specializing in privacy law. Jane also has a personal iPhone that she uses for private purposes only. Jones Labs has its primary data center in San Francisco, which is managed internally by Jones Labs engineers The secondary data center, managed by Amazon AWS. is physically located in the UK for disaster recovery purposes. Jones Labs' mobile devices backup is managed by a mid-sized mobile delense company located in Denver, which physically stores the data in Canada to reduce costs. Jones Labs MS Office documents are securely stored in a Microsoft Office 365 data Under Section 702 of F1SA. The NSA may do which of the following without a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant?

Question 155 - CIPP-US discussion

Report
Export

The FTC often negotiates consent decrees with companies found to be in violation of privacy principles. How does this benefit both parties involved?

A.

It standardizes the amount of fines.

Answers
A.

It standardizes the amount of fines.

B.

It simplifies the audit requirements.

Answers
B.

It simplifies the audit requirements.

C.

It avoids potentially harmful publicity.

Answers
C.

It avoids potentially harmful publicity.

D.

It spares the expense of going to trial.

Answers
D.

It spares the expense of going to trial.

Suggested answer: D

Explanation:

A consent decree is a settlement agreement between the FTC and a company that has engaged in unfair or deceptive privacy practices. A consent decree typically requires the company to stop the unlawful conduct, implement remedial measures, pay a civil penalty, and submit to ongoing monitoring and reporting. A consent decree benefits both parties involved because it spares the expense of going to trial, which can be costly, time-consuming, and uncertain. A consent decree also allows the parties to negotiate the terms of the settlement, rather than having a court impose a judgment. A consent decree does not admit liability or wrongdoing by the company, but it has the force of law and can be enforced by the FTC or the courts if the company violates its terms.Reference:

IAPP CIPP/US Body of Knowledge, Section I.A.1.a

IAPP CIPP/US Textbook, Chapter 1, pp. 10-11

FTC Consent Decrees

asked 22/11/2024
Johan Benavides
42 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first