ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

Related questions










SCENARIO Please use the following to answer the next question; Jane is a U.S. citizen and a senior software engineer at California-based Jones Labs, a major software supplier to the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies Jane's manager, Patrick, is a French citizen who has been living in California for over a decade. Patrick has recently begun to suspect that Jane is an insider secretly transmitting trade secrets to foreign intelligence. Unbeknownst to Patrick, the FBI has already received a hint from anonymous whistleblower, and jointly with the National Secunty Agency is investigating Jane's possible implication in a sophisticated foreign espionage campaign Ever since the pandemic. Jane has been working from home. To complete her daily tasks she uses her corporate laptop, which after each togin conspicuously provides notice that the equipment belongs to Jones Labs and may be monitored according to the enacted privacy policy and employment handbook Jane also has a corporate mobile phone that she uses strictly for business, the terms of which are defined in her employment contract and elaborated upon in her employee handbook. Both the privacy policy and the employee handbook are revised annually by a reputable California law firm specializing in privacy law. Jane also has a personal iPhone that she uses for private purposes only. Jones Labs has its primary data center in San Francisco, which is managed internally by Jones Labs engineers The secondary data center, managed by Amazon AWS. is physically located in the UK for disaster recovery purposes. Jones Labs' mobile devices backup is managed by a mid-sized mobile delense company located in Denver, which physically stores the data in Canada to reduce costs. Jones Labs MS Office documents are securely stored in a Microsoft Office 365 data Under Section 702 of F1SA. The NSA may do which of the following without a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant?

Question 160 - CIPP-US discussion

Report
Export

In 2011, the FTC announced a settlement with Google regarding its social networking service Google Buzz. The FTC alleged that in the process of launching the service, the company did all of the following EXCEPT?

A.

Violated its own privacy policies.

Answers
A.

Violated its own privacy policies.

B.

Engaged in deceptive trade practices.

Answers
B.

Engaged in deceptive trade practices.

C.

Failed to comply with Safe Harbor principles.

Answers
C.

Failed to comply with Safe Harbor principles.

D.

Failed to employ sufficient security safeguards.

Answers
D.

Failed to employ sufficient security safeguards.

Suggested answer: D

Explanation:

The FTC alleged that Google violated its own privacy policies, engaged in deceptive trade practices, and failed to comply with Safe Harbor principles when it launched Google Buzz, a social networking service that automatically enrolled Gmail users and exposed their email contacts and other personal information without their consent or control. The FTC did not allege that Google failed to employ sufficient security safeguards, although it did require Google to implement a comprehensive privacy program and submit to regular privacy audits as part of the settlement. The other statements are incorrect because:

A . Violated its own privacy policies: The FTC alleged that Google violated its own privacy policies by using information collected from Gmail users for a purpose that was incompatible with the purpose for which the information was collected, without obtaining their affirmative consent. Google's privacy policy stated that 'When you sign up for a particular service that requires registration, we ask you to provide personal information.If we use this information in a manner different than the purpose for which it was collected, then we will ask for your consent prior to such use.'1

B . Engaged in deceptive trade practices: The FTC alleged that Google engaged in deceptive trade practices by misrepresenting the extent to which consumers could exercise control over the collection, use, and sharing of their personal information through Google Buzz. For example, Google offered consumers the option to decline or turn off Google Buzz, but the option was ineffective and did not fully remove the consumer from the social network.Google also misled consumers about how their email contacts would be treated on Google Buzz, and failed to disclose that certain information, such as the user's frequent email contacts, would be made public by default.1

C . Failed to comply with Safe Harbor principles: The FTC alleged that Google failed to comply with the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework, which provides a method for U.S. companies to transfer personal data from the European Union to the United States in a way that meets EU data protection requirements. Google had self-certified to the Department of Commerce that it adhered to the Safe Harbor Privacy Principles, which include notice, choice, access, and enforcement.The FTC alleged that Google's conduct violated the notice and choice principles, as well as the requirement to adhere to the Safe Harbor FAQs.1Reference:FTC Charges Deceptive Privacy Practices in Google's Rollout of Its Buzz Social Network,Google, Inc., In the Matter of,Google settles with FTC over Buzz; Privacy policies to be audited for two decades,Google Settles FTC Complaint over Google Buzz Privacy

asked 22/11/2024
Fu Sin
31 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first