ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

Related questions










SCENARIO Please use the following to answer the next question; Jane is a U.S. citizen and a senior software engineer at California-based Jones Labs, a major software supplier to the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies Jane's manager, Patrick, is a French citizen who has been living in California for over a decade. Patrick has recently begun to suspect that Jane is an insider secretly transmitting trade secrets to foreign intelligence. Unbeknownst to Patrick, the FBI has already received a hint from anonymous whistleblower, and jointly with the National Secunty Agency is investigating Jane's possible implication in a sophisticated foreign espionage campaign Ever since the pandemic. Jane has been working from home. To complete her daily tasks she uses her corporate laptop, which after each togin conspicuously provides notice that the equipment belongs to Jones Labs and may be monitored according to the enacted privacy policy and employment handbook Jane also has a corporate mobile phone that she uses strictly for business, the terms of which are defined in her employment contract and elaborated upon in her employee handbook. Both the privacy policy and the employee handbook are revised annually by a reputable California law firm specializing in privacy law. Jane also has a personal iPhone that she uses for private purposes only. Jones Labs has its primary data center in San Francisco, which is managed internally by Jones Labs engineers The secondary data center, managed by Amazon AWS. is physically located in the UK for disaster recovery purposes. Jones Labs' mobile devices backup is managed by a mid-sized mobile delense company located in Denver, which physically stores the data in Canada to reduce costs. Jones Labs MS Office documents are securely stored in a Microsoft Office 365 data Under Section 702 of F1SA. The NSA may do which of the following without a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant?

Question 189 - CIPP-US discussion

Report
Export

Which of the following most accurately describes the regulatory status ot pandemic contact-tracing apps in the United States?

A.

Contact tracing is covered exclusively under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

Answers
A.

Contact tracing is covered exclusively under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

B.

Contact tracing is regulated by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Answers
B.

Contact tracing is regulated by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

C.

Contact tracing is subject to a patchwork of federal and state privacy laws

Answers
C.

Contact tracing is subject to a patchwork of federal and state privacy laws

D.

Contact tracing is not regulated in the United States.

Answers
D.

Contact tracing is not regulated in the United States.

Suggested answer: C

Explanation:

In the United States, pandemic contact-tracing apps are regulated under a patchwork of federal and state privacy laws, rather than a single, comprehensive framework. Contact-tracing initiatives often involve the collection and processing of sensitive data, including location and health information, which may fall under different legal regimes depending on the jurisdiction and type of data.

Key Regulations Affecting Contact-Tracing Apps:

State Privacy Laws:

States such as California (via the California Consumer Privacy Act - CCPA) and others have privacy laws that may apply to contact-tracing apps, particularly when personal data is collected or shared.

State-level health privacy laws may also govern how health-related data is collected and used.

HIPAA:

HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) applies only if the app is used by or on behalf of a covered entity (e.g., healthcare providers or health plans). If the app is operated by a private company without a connection to a HIPAA-covered entity, HIPAA likely does not apply.

Federal Guidance:

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces general privacy protections under Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive practices.

The FTC has also issued guidance on privacy considerations for health-related apps.

Other Federal and Sector-Specific Laws:

If the app collects health-related data, it could also trigger obligations under laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or sector-specific rules.

Explanation of Options:

A. Contact tracing is covered exclusively under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): This is incorrect. HIPAA applies only to covered entities and their business associates, not broadly to all contact-tracing apps or initiatives.

B. Contact tracing is regulated by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): This is incorrect. While the CDC provides guidance and recommendations for public health, it does not have regulatory authority over contact-tracing apps.

C. Contact tracing is subject to a patchwork of federal and state privacy laws: This is correct. Contact-tracing apps in the U.S. are governed by various federal, state, and sector-specific laws, creating a patchwork regulatory framework.

D. Contact tracing is not regulated in the United States: This is incorrect. While there is no single regulatory framework for contact tracing, the practice is subject to multiple federal and state laws.

Reference from CIPP/US Materials:

IAPP CIPP/US Certification Textbook: Discusses the application of HIPAA, state privacy laws, and federal regulations to health-related technologies, including contact-tracing apps.

FTC Guidance on Health Apps: Details privacy considerations for app developers handling health-related data.

asked 22/11/2024
Noor Amy
35 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first