CT-AI: Certified Tester AI Testing

Labelling Approaches: Among the options provided, pre-labeled datasets require the least time and effort because the data has already been labeled, eliminating the need for further manual or automated labeling efforts.

Reference: ISTQB_CT-AI_Syllabus_v1.0, Section 4.5 Data Labelling for Supervised Learning, which discusses various approaches to data labeling, including pre-labeled datasets, and their associated time and effort requirements.

The question asks which test is least likely to be performed during the ML model testing phase. Let's consider each option:

Testing the accuracy of the classification model (A): Accuracy testing is a fundamental part of the ML model testing phase. It ensures that the model correctly classifies the data as intended and meets the required performance metrics.

Testing the API of the service powered by the ML model (B): Testing the API is crucial, especially if the ML model is deployed as part of a service. This ensures that the service integrates well with other systems and that the API performs as expected.

Testing the speed of the training of the model (C): This is least likely to be part of the ML model testing phase. The speed of training is more relevant during the development phase when optimizing and tuning the model. During testing, the focus is more on the model's performance and behavior rather than how quickly it was trained.

Testing the speed of the prediction by the model (D): Testing the speed of prediction is important to ensure that the model meets performance requirements in a production environment, especially for real-time applications.

ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus Section 3.2 on ML Workflow and Section 5 on ML Functional Performance Metrics discuss the focus of testing during the model testing phase, which includes accuracy and prediction speed but not the training speed.

AI test environments have several unique characteristics that differentiate them from traditional test environments. Let's evaluate each option:

A . Challenges resulting from low accuracy of the models.

Low accuracy is a common challenge in AI systems, especially during initial development and training phases. Ensuring the model performs accurately in varied and unpredictable scenarios is a critical aspect of AI testing.

B . The challenge of mimicking undefined scenarios generated due to self-learning.

AI systems, particularly those that involve machine learning, can generate undefined or unexpected scenarios due to their self-learning capabilities. Mimicking and testing these scenarios is a unique challenge in AI environments.

C . The challenge of providing explainability to the decisions made by the system.

Explainability, or the ability to understand and articulate how an AI system arrives at its decisions, is a significant and unique challenge in AI testing. This is crucial for trust and transparency in AI systems.

D . Challenges in the creation of scenarios of human handover for autonomous systems.

While important, the creation of scenarios for human handover in autonomous systems is not a characteristic unique to AI test environments. It is more related to the operational and deployment challenges of autonomous systems rather than the intrinsic technology-related characteristics of AI .

Given the above points, option D is the correct answer because it describes a challenge related to operational deployment rather than a technology-related characteristic unique to AI test environments.

Coverage for Neuron Activation Values: Sign change coverage is used to ensure that test cases cause each neuron to achieve both positive and negative activation values. This type of coverage ensures that the neurons are thoroughly tested under different activation states.

Reference: ISTQB_CT-AI_Syllabus_v1.0, Section 6.2 Coverage Measures for Neural Networks, which details different types of coverage measures, including sign change coverage.

Type of Testing for Stock-Price Prediction Models: Concept drift refers to the change in the statistical properties of the target variable over time. Severe weather storms causing massive losses in coffee production and affecting stock prices would require testing for concept drift to ensure that the model adapts to new patterns in data over time.

Reference: ISTQB_CT-AI_Syllabus_v1.0, Section 7.6 Testing for Concept Drift, which explains the need to test for concept drift in models that might be affected by changing external factors.

When written requirements are given in text documents, the best way to generate test cases is by using Natural Language Processing (NLP). Here's why:

Natural Language Processing (NLP): NLP can analyze and understand human language. It can be used to process textual requirements to extract relevant information and generate test cases. This method is efficient in handling large volumes of textual data and identifying key elements necessary for testing.

Why Not Other Options:

Analyzing source code for generating test cases: This is more suitable for white-box testing where the code is available, but it doesn't apply to text-based requirements.

Machine learning on logs of execution: This approach is used for dynamic analysis based on system behavior during execution rather than static textual requirements.

GUI analysis by computer vision: This is used for testing graphical user interfaces and is not applicable to text-based requirements.

The question refers to a problem where data used for an object detection ML system was labelled incorrectly. This issue is most closely related to 'accuracy issues.' Here's a detailed explanation:

Accuracy Issues: The primary goal of labeling data in machine learning is to ensure that the model can accurately learn and make predictions based on the given labels. Incorrectly labeled data directly impacts the model's accuracy, leading to poor performance because the model learns incorrect patterns.

Why Not Other Options:

Security Issues: This pertains to data breaches or unauthorized access, which is not relevant to the problem of incorrect data labeling.

Privacy Issues: This concerns the protection of personal data and is not related to the accuracy of data labeling.

Bias Issues: While bias in data can affect model performance, it specifically refers to systematic errors or prejudices in the data rather than outright incorrect labeling.

Challenges for Acquiring Test Data in ML Systems: Compliance needs, the changing nature of data over time, and sourcing data from public sources are significant challenges. Data being generated quickly is generally not a challenge; it can actually be beneficial as it provides more data for training and testing.

Reference: ISTQB_CT-AI_Syllabus_v1.0, Sections on Data Preparation and Data Quality Issues.

Back-to-back testing is a method where the same set of tests are run on multiple implementations of the system to compare their outputs. This type of testing is typically used to ensure consistency and correctness by comparing the outputs of different implementations under identical conditions. Let's analyze the options given:

A . Comparison of the results of a current neural network model ML model implemented in platform A (for example Pytorch) with a similar neural network model ML model implemented in platform B (for example Tensorflow), for the same data.

This option describes a scenario where two different implementations of the same type of model are being compared using the same dataset. This is a typical back-to-back testing situation.

B . Comparison of the results of a home-grown neural network model ML model with results in a neural network model implemented in a standard implementation (for example Pytorch) for the same data.

This option involves comparing a custom implementation with a standard implementation, which is also a typical back-to-back testing scenario to validate the custom model against a known benchmark.

C . Comparison of the results of a neural network ML model with a current decision tree ML model for the same data.

This option involves comparing two different types of models (a neural network and a decision tree). This is not a typical scenario for back-to-back testing because the models are inherently different and would not be expected to produce identical results even on the same data.

D . Comparison of the results of the current neural network ML model on the current data set with a slightly modified data set.

This option involves comparing the outputs of the same model on slightly different datasets. This could be seen as a form of robustness testing or sensitivity analysis, but not typical back-to-back testing as it doesn't involve comparing multiple implementations.

Based on this analysis, option C is the one that describes a situation of back-to-back testing the least because it compares two fundamentally different models, which is not the intent of back-to-back testing.