Amazon DEA-C01 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 9

This solution meets the requirement of gaining access to SageMaker Studio to use AWS Glue interactive sessions. AWS Glue interactive sessions are a way to use AWS Glue DataBrew and AWS Glue Data Catalog from within SageMaker Studio. To use AWS Glue interactive sessions, the data engineer's IAM user needs to have permissions to assume the AWS Glue service role and the SageMaker execution role. By adding a policy to the data engineer's IAM user that includes the sts:AssumeRole action for the AWS Glue and SageMaker service principals in the trust policy, the data engineer can grant these permissions and avoid the access denied error. The other options are not sufficient or necessary to resolve the error.Reference:

Get started with data integration from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift using AWS Glue interactive sessions

Troubleshoot Errors - Amazon SageMaker

AccessDeniedException on sagemaker:CreateDomain in AWS SageMaker Studio, despite having SageMakerFullAccess

AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform. It can automatically discover and categorize data from various sources, including SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL Server, MongoDB, Apache Kafka, and Amazon DynamoDB. It can also infer the schema of the data and store it in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a central metadata repository. AWS Glue can then use the schema information to generate and run Apache Spark code to extract, transform, and load the data into an Amazon S3 bucket. AWS Glue can also monitor and optimize the performance and cost of the data pipeline, and handle any schema changes that may occur in the source data. AWS Glue can meet the SLA of loading the data into the S3 bucket within 15 minutes of data creation, as it can trigger the data pipeline based on events, schedules, or on-demand. AWS Glue has the least operational overhead among the options, as it does not require provisioning, configuring, or managing any servers or clusters. It also handles scaling, patching, and security automatically.Reference:

AWS Glue

[AWS Glue Data Catalog]

[AWS Glue Developer Guide]

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

Option B is the best solution to meet the requirements with the least operational overhead because S3 Object Lambda is a feature that allows you to add your own code to process data retrieved from S3 before returning it to an application. S3 Object Lambda works with S3 GET requests and can modify both the object metadata and the object data. By using S3 Object Lambda, you can implement redaction logic within an S3 Object Lambda function to dynamically redact PII based on the needs of each application that accesses the data. This way, you can avoid creating and maintaining multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction.

Option A is not a good solution because it involves creating and managing multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction for each application. This option adds complexity and storage cost to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration. Moreover, S3 bucket policies cannot enforce fine-grained data access control at the row and column level, so they are not sufficient to redact PII.

Option C is not a good solution because it involves using AWS Glue to transform the data for each application. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that can extract, transform, and load (ETL) data from various sources to various destinations, including S3. AWS Glue can also convert data to different formats, such as Parquet, which is a columnar storage format that is optimized for analytics. However, in this scenario, using AWS Glue to redact PII is not the best option because it requires creating and maintaining multiple copies of the dataset with different levels of redaction for each application. This option also adds extra time and cost to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration.

Option D is not a good solution because it involves creating and configuring an API Gateway endpoint that has custom authorizers. API Gateway is a service that allows you to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. API Gateway can also integrate with other AWS services, such as Lambda, to provide custom logic for processing requests. However, in this scenario, using API Gateway to redact PII is not the best option because it requires writing and maintaining custom code and configuration for the API endpoint, the custom authorizers, and the REST API call. This option also adds complexity and latency to the data protection process and requires additional resources and configuration.

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

Introducing Amazon S3 Object Lambda -- Use Your Code to Process Data as It Is Being Retrieved from S3

Using Bucket Policies and User Policies - Amazon Simple Storage Service

AWS Glue Documentation

What is Amazon API Gateway? - Amazon API Gateway

AWS Glue is a fully managed serverless ETL service that can handle various data sources and formats, including .csv files in Amazon S3. AWS Glue provides two types of jobs: PySpark and Python shell. PySpark jobs use Apache Spark to process large-scale data in parallel, while Python shell jobs use Python scripts to process small-scale data in a single execution environment. For this requirement, a Python shell job is more suitable and cost-effective, as the size of each S3 object is less than 100 MB, which does not require distributed processing. A Python shell job can use pandas, a popular Python library for data analysis, to transform the .csv data as needed. The other solutions are not optimal or relevant for this requirement. Writing a custom Python application and hosting it on an Amazon EKS cluster would require more effort and resources to set up and manage the Kubernetes environment, as well as to handle the data ingestion and transformation logic. Writing a PySpark ETL script and hosting it on an Amazon EMR cluster would also incur more costs and complexity to provision and configure the EMR cluster, as well as to use Apache Spark for processing small data files. Writing an AWS Glue PySpark job would also be less efficient and economical than a Python shell job, as it would involve unnecessary overhead and charges for using Apache Spark for small data files.Reference:

AWS Glue

Working with Python Shell Jobs

pandas

[AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide]

The most cost-effective solution in this case is to apply a lifecycle policy to transition records to Amazon S3 Standard-IA storage after 30 days. Here's why:

Amazon S3 Lifecycle Policies: Amazon S3 offers lifecycle policies that allow you to automatically transition objects between different storage classes to optimize costs. For data that is frequently accessed in the first 30 days and infrequently accessed after that, transitioning from the S3 Standard storage class to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 30 days makes the most sense. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently but still needs to be retained, offering lower storage costs than S3 Standard with a retrieval cost for access.

Cost Optimization: S3 Standard-IA offers a lower price per GB than S3 Standard. Since the data will be accessed infrequently after 30 days, using S3 Standard-IA will lower storage costs while still allowing for immediate retrieval when necessary.

Compliance with Regulations: Since the records need to be immediately accessible for the first 30 days, the use of S3 Standard for that period ensures compliance with regulatory requirements. After 30 days, transitioning to S3 Standard-IA continues to meet access requirements for infrequent access while reducing storage costs.

Alternatives Considered:

Option B (S3 Intelligent-Tiering): While S3 Intelligent-Tiering automatically moves data between access tiers based on access patterns, it incurs a small monthly monitoring and automation charge per object. It could be a viable option, but transitioning data to S3 Standard-IA directly would be more cost-effective since the pattern of access is well-known (frequent for 30 days, infrequent thereafter).

Option C (S3 Glacier Deep Archive): Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class, but it is not suitable in this case because the data needs to be accessed immediately within 30 days and on an infrequent basis thereafter. Glacier Deep Archive requires hours for data retrieval, which is not acceptable for infrequent access needs.

Option D (S3 Standard-IA for all records): Using S3 Standard-IA for all records would result in higher costs for the first 30 days, as the data is frequently accessed. S3 Standard-IA incurs retrieval charges, making it less suitable for frequently accessed data.

Amazon S3 Lifecycle Policies

S3 Storage Classes

Cost Management and Data Optimization Using Lifecycle Policies

AWS Data Engineering Documentation

The performance issue in Amazon Redshift Spectrum queries arises due to the nature of CSV files, which are row-based storage formats. Spectrum is more optimized for columnar formats, which significantly improve performance by reducing the amount of data scanned. Also, partitioning data based on relevant columns like order date can further reduce the amount of data scanned, as queries can focus only on the necessary partitions.

A . Configure the third-party application to create the files in a columnar format:

Columnar formats (like Parquet or ORC) store data in a way that is optimized for analytical queries because they allow queries to scan only the columns required, rather than scanning all columns in a row-based format like CSV.

Amazon Redshift Spectrum works much more efficiently with columnar formats, reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned, which improves query performance.

C . Partition the order data in the S3 bucket based on order date:

Partitioning the data on columns like order date allows Redshift Spectrum to skip scanning unnecessary partitions, leading to improved query performance.

By organizing data into partitions, you minimize the number of files Spectrum has to read, further optimizing performance.

Alternatives Considered:

B (Develop an AWS Glue ETL job): While consolidating files can improve performance by reducing the number of small files (which can be inefficient to process), it adds additional ETL complexity. Switching to a columnar format (Option A) and partitioning (Option C) provides more significant performance improvements with less development effort.

D and E (JSON-related options): Using JSON format or the SUPER type in Redshift introduces complexity and isn't as efficient as the proposed solutions, especially since JSON is not a columnar format.

Amazon Redshift Spectrum Documentation

Columnar Formats and Data Partitioning in S3

The problem described requires identifying matching records even when there is no unique identifier. AWS Lake Formation FindMatches is designed for this purpose. It uses machine learning (ML) to deduplicate and find matching records in datasets that do not share a common identifier.

Alternatives Considered:

A (Amazon Made pattern matching): Amazon Made is not a service in AWS, and pattern matching typically refers to regular expressions, which are not suitable for deduplication without a common identifier.

B (AWS Glue PySpark Filter class): PySpark's Filter class can help refine datasets, but it does not offer the ML-based matching capabilities required to find matches between records without unique identifiers.

C (Partition tables on a unique identifier): Partitioning requires a unique identifier, which the question states is unavailable.

AWS Glue Documentation on Lake Formation FindMatches

FindMatches in AWS Lake Formation

D Train and use the AWS Lake Formation FindMatches transform in the ETL job: FindMatches is a transform available in AWS Lake Formation that uses ML to discover duplicate records or related records that might not have a common unique identifier. It can be integrated into an AWS Glue ETL job to perform deduplication or matching tasks. FindMatches is highly effective in scenarios where records do not share a key, such as customer records from different sources that need to be merged or reconciled.

The requirement is to detect violations of data access policies and receive notifications with the username of the violator. AWS CloudTrail can provide object-level tracking for S3 to capture detailed API actions on specific S3 objects, including the user who performed the action.

AWS CloudTrail:

CloudTrail can monitor API calls made to an S3 bucket, including object-level API actions such as GetObject, PutObject, and DeleteObject. This will help detect access violations based on the API calls made by different users.

CloudTrail logs include details such as the user identity, which is essential for meeting the requirement of including the username in notifications.

The CloudTrail logs can be forwarded to Amazon CloudWatch to trigger alarms based on certain access patterns (e.g., violations of specific policies).

Amazon CloudWatch:

By forwarding CloudTrail logs to CloudWatch, you can set up alarms that are triggered when a specific condition is met, such as unauthorized access or policy violations. The alarm can include detailed information from the CloudTrail log, including the username.

Alternatives Considered:

A (AWS Config rules): While AWS Config can track resource configurations and compliance, it does not provide real-time, detailed tracking of object-level events like CloudTrail does.

B (CloudWatch metrics): CloudWatch does not gather object-level metrics for S3 directly. For this use case, CloudTrail provides better granularity.

D (S3 server access logs): S3 server access logs can monitor access, but they do not provide the real-time monitoring and alerting features that CloudTrail with CloudWatch alarms offer. They also do not include API-level granularity like CloudTrail.

AWS CloudTrail Integration with S3

Amazon CloudWatch Alarms