Which of these is a key CX EVPN VXLAN capability?

Support Asymmetric Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB)

Only supports centralized gateway to route between overlay networks

Does not forward broadcasts, unicasts, and multicast (BUM) traffic in the overlay

In a multi-AS underlay design:

You must use eBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology

Either eBGP or iBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology will work

This is a wrong design for routing protocol for the underlay

You must use iBGP for underlay routing within a leaf and spine topology

BGP EVPN type 2 routes advertise MAC addresses of clients connected to VNIs on this VTEP. Other VTEPs use this information to populate the MAC address tables for the VLAN associated with the VNI.VXLAN does not rely on MAC forwarding to establish connectivity.

The forwarding interface for the MAC address is the tunnel to the next hop VTEP

The forwarding interface for the MAC address is the local interfaces

The forwarding interface for the MAC address is the tunnel to the next hop VTEP

You are planning to use distributed routing for overlay subnets in an EVPN VXLAN fabric. The customer needs to provide DHCP addresses to some VMs in the tenant-a VRF. The DHCP server is in the shared VRF. What is one step you should take?

On each VTEP switch, create a loopback interface in the shared VRF with the same IP on both switches in a VSX pair

Change the design to use centralized routing because HPE Aruba CX switches cannot support DHCP relay with distributed routing

For every SVI, assign a unique actual IP address, different from the active gateway IP address

On each VTEP switch, create a loopback interface in the shared VRF with the same IP on both switches in a VSX pair

On each VTEP switch, create a loopback interface in the tenant-a VRF with a different IP on both switches in a VSX pair

In a multi-AS underlay design:

All spine switches are in the same AS while each leaf (VSX pair if used) are in their own AS

Every spine and every leaf is in their own AS

All spine and leaf switches are in one AS and the border leaf is in separate AS

Every spine is in their own AS while all leaf switches in one AS

What is true about rollback plan for migration phases? (Select two)

Archive Last known good configuration (state)

Determine maximum time for rollback

Staff members can't be included in rollback dependency

Don't give a timeframe for the rollback as this might affect customer confidence in your solution

Archive Last known good configuration (state)

Determine maximum time for rollback

Two VMs on the same ESXi host are assigned to an isolated VLAN 2001 (primary VLAN 1001). The host connects to an HPE Aruba CX 10000 switch on an access port. The switch supports the same PVLAN settings. VM 1 sends traffic to VM 2. Which policy or policies does the switch apply (assuming that they exist)?

No policies because the traffic remains local to the ESXi host

Ingress and egress policy on VLAN 1001

What is true about the assumption documents?

Assumptions vary based on the project

Must never be included in the solution proposal

Assumptions are so essentials that they need to always be included with every solution

Assumptions are only needed if the customer asks for it

Assumptions vary based on the project

You are adding EVPN VXLAN to an L3 spine and leaf topology that uses OSPF for the underlay. You plan to use a single BGP AS. Which design for EVPN neighbors is correct?

At least one spine switch should act as route reflector and specify the leaf switches' unique loopback IPs as route reflector clients

Leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with other leaf switches using their VXLAN loopback IPs. Route reflectors are not required

The border leaf switches should act as route reflectors and specify the leaf switches' VXLAN loopback IPs as route reflector clients

At least one spine switch should act as route reflector and specify the leaf switches' unique loopback IPs as route reflector clients

Leaf switches should establish iBGP sessions with spine switches on their actual P2P link IP addresses. Route reflectors are not required

In Routing design for a two-tier topology between the data center and other parts of the network, select the best option from below:

Set up each link as an L3 interface or routed-only port (ROP)

You should not use VSX LAGs for these connections

Establish point-to-point links using individual /29 subnets

Set up each link as an L3 interface or routed-only port (ROP)

You want to implement distributed firewall policies that micro-segment VM-to-VM traffic, including within the VLAN and same host. The VMs should be able to send traffic on permitted TCP ports, but other traffic should be dropped (hosts are isolated). What are two requirements? (Select two.)

SVI 10 on the switch has IP local ARP proxy enabled on it

VLAN 10 is converted to a PVLAN on the switch and VMware hosts. The VMs are placed in an isolated VLAN

SVI 10 on the switch has IP local ARP proxy enabled on it

The VMware host is configured to implement a local firewall

VLAN 10 is converted to a PVLAN on the switch only. The VMs are placed in an isolated VLAN

VLAN 10 is converted to a PVLAN on the switch and VMware hosts. The VMs are placed in an isolated VLAN

Which of the following are deemed as Post-installation handover tasks?

Enable monitoring of new systems

You are setting up a single EVPN VXLAN fabric for a data center. A customer has one ESXi cluster in racks 1-3 that uses VLAN 10 for VMs in subnet 10.1.10.0/24. The customer has another ESXi cluster in racks 4-6 that uses VLAN 10 for VMs in subnet 10.2.10.0/24. Which is correct?

You can map VLAN 10 to one VNI on switches in racks 1-3 and to a different VNI on switches in racks 4-6

You can map VLAN 10 to different VNIs on the same switches if you place VLAN 10 in multiple VRFs

You must tell the customer to change the VLAN ID in racks 4-6 to a unique ID

You can use subnets rather than VLANs for VNI mappings so you can use the same configuration everywhere

You can map VLAN 10 to one VNI on switches in racks 1-3 and to a different VNI on switches in racks 4-6

2-Tier L2 Design* 6400 100G Core Switches* 8320 48-P 10G RJ45 Access Switches* 40G DAC connections between Core and AccessCore Switches = VSX Pairs of 6400 switches (each with 2 x 12-port QSFP28 100G modules)Each pair uses:* 2 x 1M 100G DAC for ISL* 1 x 1M 100G DAC for Keepalive* 2 x 5M 40G DAC to each access switchEach Spine switch has 5 x 100G interfaces available.This solution could scale to a maximum of:

15 total racks using same subscription rates

7 total racks using same subscription rates

10 total racks using same subscription rates

12 total racks using same subscription rates

15 total racks using same subscription rates

HP HPE7-A04 Practice Test 3 - Free Online Exam Questions 81-98

You want to configure your border leaf switches to leak routes between an overlay VRF named ''dc1'' and a VRF named ''campus,'' which connects to the campus core. You also want to leak routes between an overlay VRF named ''dc2'' and the campus VRF. ''dc1'' should not be able to communicate with ''dc2.'' Which is a valid design for the VRFs' IPv4 route-targets?

Become a Premium Member for full access

Unlock Premium Member

HP HPE7-A04 Practice Test 3

Question

HP HPE7-A04 Practice Tests

Practice Tests