IIA IIA-CIA-Part2 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 5
List of questions
Related questions
Question 41

Which of the following is an effective approach for internal auditors to take to improve collaboration with audit clients during an engagement?
1. Obtain control concerns from the client before the audit begins so the internal auditor can tailor the scope accordingly.
2. Discuss the engagement plan with the client so the client can understand the reasoning behind the approach.
3. Review test criteria and procedures where the client expresses concerns about the type of tests to be conducted.
4. Provide all observations at the end of the audit to ensure the client is in agreement with the facts before publishing the report.
Explanation:
To improve collaboration with audit clients during an engagement, it is effective for internal auditors to discuss the engagement plan with the client so they understand the reasoning behind the approach (2), and to review test criteria and procedures where the client expresses concerns about the type of tests to be conducted (3). This approach fosters transparency, helps manage client expectations, and builds trust. Obtaining control concerns before the audit (1) is also useful but less directly related to collaboration during the engagement. Providing all observations at the end of the audit (4) might not facilitate ongoing collaboration during the audit process.
Reference: IIA Standard 2200 -- Engagement Planning, IIA Standard 2400 -- Communicating Results
Question 42

According to IIA guidance, which of the following is true regarding the exit conference for an internal audit engagement?
Explanation:
According to IIA guidance, the primary purpose of the exit conference is to ensure timely communication of observations and findings, especially those that require immediate management action. This meeting allows auditors to discuss their findings with management, address any disagreements, and clarify the facts before the final report is issued. It does not require the attendance of both the chief audit executive and the chief executive over the activity (B), nor is it solely for reviewing anticipated results (C) or the performance of the internal auditors (D).
Reference: IIA Standard 2440 -- Disseminating Results, IIA Practice Advisory 2440-1
Question 43

Which of the following components should be included in an audit finding?
1. The scope of the audit.
2. The standard(s) used by the auditor to make the evaluation.
3. The engagement's objectives.
4. The factual evidence that the internal auditor found in the course of the examination.
Explanation:
An audit finding should include the standard(s) used by the auditor to make the evaluation (2) and the factual evidence found during the examination (4). These components provide the basis for the auditor's conclusions and ensure that the findings are well-supported and objective. The scope of the audit (1) and the engagement's objectives (3) are typically included in the overall audit report but are not components of individual audit findings.
Question 44

A newly promoted chief audit executive (CAE) is faced with a backlog of assurance engagement reports to review for approval. In an attempt to attach a priority for this review, the CAE scans the opinion statement on each report. According to IIA guidance, which of the following opinions would receive the lowest review priority?
1. Graded positive opinion.
2. Negative assurance opinion.
3. Limited assurance opinion.
4. Third-party opinion.
Explanation:
: According to IIA guidance, a newly promoted chief audit executive (CAE) should prioritize the review of audit reports based on the significance of the findings indicated by the opinion statements. A graded positive opinion (1) suggests that the audit found strong controls with no significant issues, while a third-party opinion (4) typically involves external assessments that may not require immediate internal action. Therefore, these opinions would receive the lowest review priority. In contrast, negative assurance opinions (2) and limited assurance opinions (3) indicate potential issues or limitations in the effectiveness of controls, necessitating higher priority review to address any significant concerns promptly.
Reference: IIA Standard 2410 -- Criteria for Communicating, IIA Practice Advisory 2410-1
Question 45

After finalizing an assurance engagement concerning safety operations in the oil mining process, the audit team concluded that no key controls were compromised. However, some opportunities for improvement were noted. Which of the following would be the most appropriate way for the chief audit executive (CAE) to report these results?
Explanation:
When an assurance engagement concludes with no key controls being compromised but notes some opportunities for improvement, the most appropriate approach for the chief audit executive (CAE) is to send the final report to operational management. This ensures that the responsible management can act on the improvement opportunities. Additionally, notifying senior management and the audit committee that no significant findings were identified keeps them informed without overloading them with less critical details, maintaining transparency and proper communication channels.
Reference: IIA Standard 2400 -- Communicating Results, IIA Practice Guide -- Communicating Assurance Engagement Results
Question 46

While conducting an audit of a third party's Web-based payment processor, an internal auditor discovers that a programming error allows customers to create multiple accounts for a single mailing address. Management agrees to correct the program and notify customers with multiple accounts that the accounts will be consolidated. Which of the following actions should the auditor take?
1. Schedule a follow-up review to verify that the program was corrected and the accounts were consolidated.
2. Evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the corrective action proposed by management.
3. Amend the scope of the subsequent audit to verify that the program was corrected and that accounts were consolidated.
4. Submit management's plan of action to the external auditors for additional review.
Explanation:
When an internal auditor discovers an issue such as a programming error allowing multiple accounts for a single address, the auditor should ensure that the corrective actions are both adequate and effective. This includes scheduling a follow-up review (1) to verify that the program has been corrected and that the accounts have been consolidated. Additionally, evaluating the adequacy and effectiveness of the corrective action proposed by management (2) is essential to ensure the issue has been resolved properly.
Reference: = IIA Standard 2500 - Monitoring Progress and IIA Standard 2320 - Analysis and Evaluation.
Question 47

An internal auditor is conducting a review of the procurement function and uncovers a potential conflict of interest between the chief operating officer and a significant supplier of IT software development services. Which of the following actions is most appropriate for the internal auditor to take?
Explanation:
Upon discovering a potential conflict of interest, the most appropriate action for the internal auditor is to inform the audit supervisor. This ensures that the issue is properly addressed and investigated according to the organization's policies and procedures. The audit supervisor can then decide on the appropriate course of action, including whether further investigation is warranted.
Reference: = IIA Standard 2440 - Disseminating Results and IIA Standard 2600 - Resolution of Senior Management's Acceptance of Risks.
Question 48

A large retail organization, which sells most of its products online, experiences a computer hacking incident. The chief IT officer immediately investigates the incident and concludes that the attempt was not successful. The chief audit executive (CAE) learns of the attack in a casual conversation with an IT auditor. Which of the following actions should the CAE take?
1. Meet with the chief IT officer to discuss the report and control improvements that will be implemented as a result of the security breach, if any.
2. Immediately inform the chair of the audit committee of the security breach, because thus far only the chief IT officer is aware of the incident.
3. Meet with the IT auditor to develop an appropriate audit program to review the organization's Internet-based sales process and key controls.
4. Include the incident in the next quarterly report to the audit committee.
Explanation:
The chief audit executive (CAE) should meet with the chief IT officer to discuss the incident, the investigation, and any control improvements that will be implemented (1). Additionally, developing an appropriate audit program with the IT auditor to review the organization's Internet-based sales process and key controls (3) is a proactive approach to ensure future incidents are prevented and to enhance the organization's security posture.
Reference: = IIA Standard 2120 - Risk Management and IIA Standard 2201 - Planning Considerations.
Question 49

During an assurance engagement, an internal auditor noted that the time staff spent accessing customer information in large Excel spreadsheets could be reduced significantly through the use of macros. The auditor would like to train staff on how to use the macros. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action for the internal auditor to take?
Explanation:
To maintain independence and objectivity, the internal auditor should seek permission to extend the current engagement and obtain approval from the process owner before performing any improvement tasks such as training staff on how to use macros. This ensures that the improvement task is formally acknowledged and approved, maintaining the integrity of the audit process.
Reference: = IIA Standard 1130 - Impairment to Independence or Objectivity and IIA Standard 2410 - Criteria for Communicating.
Question 50

According to IIA guidance, which of the following strategies would add the least value to the achievement of the internal audit activity's (IAA's) objectives?
Explanation:
While aligning organizational activities to internal audit activities and measuring according to approved IAA performance measures is important, it adds the least direct value to achieving the IAA's objectives compared to the other strategies. Establishing periodic reviews, using engagement results to guide future activities, and ensuring the format and frequency of IAA reporting align with the organization's governance structure are all more directly impactful strategies.
Reference: = IIA Standard 1300 - Quality Assurance and Improvement Program and IIA Standard 1320 - Reporting on the Quality Assurance and Improvement Program.
Question