Salesforce Certified B2B Commerce Developer Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 14

Two data types that are considered discrete units of work (code units) within a transaction in the debug logs are web service invocation and Apex class. A discrete unit of work (code unit) is a segment of executable code that runs as part of a transaction in Salesforce. A transaction is a sequence of operations that are treated as a single unit of work and are executed under certain isolation and consistency rules. A transaction can consist of one or more discrete units of work (code units) that are executed sequentially or concurrently depending on various factors such as triggers, asynchronous calls, or limits. A debug log is a record of database operations, system processes, and errors that occur when executing a transaction or running unit tests in Salesforce. A debug log can capture information about each discrete unit of work (code unit) within a transaction, such as its start time, end time, duration, events, variables, and limits. A web service invocation is a type of discrete unit of work (code unit) that involves calling an external web service from Apex code using SOAP or REST protocols. A web service invocation can be synchronous or asynchronous depending on the method used to make the callout. A web service invocation can be captured in a debug log with its details and results. An Apex class is another type of discrete unit of work (code unit) that involves executing Apex code that defines a class with properties and methods. An Apex class can be invoked from various sources such as triggers, Visualforce pages, Lightning components, or API calls. An Apex class can be captured in a debug log with its details and results. A validation rule is not a type of discrete unit of work (code unit) within a transaction in the debug logs, as it is not a segment of executable code but rather a formula expression that defines a business rule for a field or object. A validation rule can be evaluated during a transaction and cause an error if the rule condition is not met, but it cannot be captured as a separate code unit in a debug log. A Lightning component load is not a type of discrete unit of work (code unit) within a transaction in the debug logs either, as it is not a segment of executable code but rather an event that occurs when a Lightning component is rendered on a web page or application. A Lightning component load can be measured by various performance tools such as Lightning Inspector or Lighthouse, but it cannot be captured as a separate code unit in a debug log. Salesforce

Reference: [Salesforce Developer Blog: Transactions and Request Processing], [Salesforce Help: Debug Logs], [Salesforce Developer Guide: Invoking Callouts Using Apex], [Salesforce Developer Guide: Apex Classes], [Salesforce Help: Validation Rules], [Salesforce Developer Blog: Measuring Lightning Component Performance]

To implement a Lightning web component which can read, create and modify single records, the recommended path forward is to use Lightning Data Service. Lightning Data Service is a service that provides access to Salesforce data and metadata, cache management, and data synchronization across components. Lightning Data Service allows developers to use standard components or base components to perform CRUD (create, read, update, delete) operations on single records without writing Apex code or SOQL queries. Lightning Data Service also handles data caching, performance optimization, and conflict resolution automatically. Using base components is not a sufficient way to implement a Lightning web component which can read, create and modify single records, as base components are only user interface elements that do not provide data access or manipulation functionality by themselves. Base components need to be used with Lightning Data Service or other services to perform CRUD operations on single records. Writing custom functions against a wire adapter is not a recommended way to implement a Lightning web component which can read, create and modify single records, as it involves writing complex and error-prone JavaScript code that may not be efficient or scalable. Writing custom functions against a wire adapter also requires handling data caching, performance optimization, and conflict resolution manually. Creating an Apex controller is not a recommended way either, as it involves writing Apex code that may not be necessary or optimal for performing CRUD operations on single records. Creating an Apex controller also requires exposing Apex methods using @AuraEnabled or @RemoteAction annotations and invoking them from JavaScript code using imperative calls or promises. Salesforce

Reference:Lightning Web Components Developer Guide: Access Salesforce Data,Lightning Web Components Developer Guide: Base Components, [Lightning Web Components Developer Guide: Call Apex Methods]

To know if a CSS file containing small changes was actually deployed to the org, one way that a developer can accomplish this is by right-clicking the CSS file and choosing Diff File Against Org. Diff File Against Org is an option that allows the developer to compare a local file with its remote version in the org using Salesforce CLI commands. The developer can use Visual Studio Code to execute these commands by right-clicking on files or folders in the project and choosing from various diff options. Right-clicking the CSS file and choosing Diff File Against Org allows the developer to see the differences between the local CSS file and the remote CSS file in the org side by side in Visual Studio Code. This way, the developer can verify if their changes were deployed successfully or not. Clicking the Tools menu and selecting Diff Styles Against Org... is not a valid way to know if a CSS file was deployed to the org, as there is no such option in Visual Studio Code or Salesforce CLI. Right-clicking the folder for the component and choosing Diff Styles Against Org is not a valid way either, as there is no such option in Visual Studio Code or Salesforce CLI. Right-clicking the folder for the component and choosing Diff Files Against Org is not a valid way either, as it will compare all the files in the folder, not just the CSS file, which may not be efficient or necessary. Salesforce

Reference: [Salesforce CLI Command Reference: force:source:diff], [Salesforce Developer Tools for Visual Studio Code]

The product will not appear on the Portal and therefore cannot be added to the cart. A product is assigned to the entitlement policy but is missing from the Price Book related to the Buyer Group. The entitlement policy has View products and View prices in catalog checked. An entitlement policy is a set of rules that determines which products and prices a buyer group can access in the storefront. A buyer group is a group of buyers that share the same business relationship with the seller. A price book is a collection of prices for products that are available for purchase in the storefront. A product is a record that represents an item that can be sold in the storefront. To make a product visible and purchasable in the storefront, it must be assigned to both an entitlement policy and a price book that are related to the buyer group. If a product is assigned to an entitlement policy but not to a price book, it will not appear on the Portal and therefore cannot be added to the cart, regardless of the entitlement policy settings. The product will appear on the Portal with Price Unavailable status and can also be added to the cart is not a correct answer, as it contradicts the behavior of a product that is not in a price book. The product will appear on the Portal with Price Unavailable status but cannot be added to the cart is not a correct answer either, as it also contradicts the behavior of a product that is not in a price book. The product will not appear on the Portal but can be searched since it is part of the entitlement policy is not a correct answer either, as it also contradicts the behavior of a product that is not in a price book. Salesforce

Reference: [B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Entitlement Policy Object], [B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Buyer Group Object], [B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Price Book Object], [B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Product Object]

The root cause of why the custom field MyCustomField__c has no values and no column header in the CSV file is that the user does not have access to the field. A user's access to a field is determined by their profile and permission sets, which define their field-level security settings. Field-level security settings control whether a user can see, edit, or delete the value for a particular field on an object. If a user does not have access to a field, they will not be able to view or modify its value in any interface, including Data Loader. Data Loader is a tool that allows users to import or export data between Salesforce and CSV files. When using Data Loader to export data from an org, Data Loader will only include fields that are accessible to the user based on their field-level security settings. If a user does not have access to a field, Data Loader will not include that field in the CSV file, neither as a column header nor as a value. The user needs to install a specific Zulu JDK that is recommended by Salesforce is not the root cause of why MyCustomField__c has no values and no column header in the CSV file, as it is not related to field access or Data Loader functionality. A mapping file was not used when the data was loaded in is not the root cause either, as it is not related to field access or Data Loader functionality. A mapping file is an optional file that maps fields between Salesforce objects and CSV files when using Data Loader to import or export data. The user has rights to the field but there are no values in it is not the root cause either, as it contradicts the fact that MyCustomField__c has no column header in the CSV file. If the user had rights to the field but there were no values in it, Data Loader would still include MyCustomField__c as a column header in the CSV file, but leave its values blank. Salesforce

Reference: [Data Loader Guide: Export Data from Salesforce], [Data Loader Guide: Field Mapping], [Salesforce Help: Set Field-Level Security]

The most likely cause of why some orders were missing from the Data Loader export is that the Status was still set to Draft. The Status is a field on the Order Summary object that indicates the current state of the order. The Status can have values such as Draft, Submitted, Confirmed, or Cancelled. A Draft order is an order that has not been submitted or confirmed by the customer or the seller. A Draft order is not considered a completed or valid order and is not included in reports or exports. When using Data Loader to export data from an org, Data Loader will only include orders that have a Status other than Draft, such as Submitted or Confirmed. If an order has a Status of Draft, Data Loader will not include it in the CSV file, which may result in missing orders. The export job did not fully complete is not a likely cause of why some orders were missing from the Data Loader export, as it is not related to the order status or data filtering. Order Life Cycle Type was Managed is not a likely cause either, as it is not related to the order status or data filtering. The Order Life Cycle Type is a field on the Order Summary object that indicates whether the order is managed by Salesforce Order Management or by an external system. The user does not have rights to some of the records is not a likely cause either, as it contradicts the fact that some orders were exported successfully. If the user did not have rights to some of the records, Data Loader would not be able to access or export any orders at all. Salesforce

Reference:B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Order Summary Object,B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Order Status Enum,Data Loader Guide: Export Data from Salesforce

The root cause of why the CustomField__c field they added to the entity has no values under the header in the CSV file output is that the user does not have rights to the custom field. A user's access to a field is determined by their profile and permission sets, which define their field-level security settings. Field-level security settings control whether a user can see, edit, or delete the value for a particular field on an object. If a user does not have access to a field, they will not be able to view or modify its value in any interface, including Data Loader. Data Loader is a tool that allows users to import or export data between Salesforce and CSV files. When using Data Loader to export data from an org, Data Loader will only include fields that are accessible to the user based on their field-level security settings. If a user does not have access to a field, Data Loader will not include that field in the CSV file, neither as a column header nor as a value. The developer does not have the correct JDK that is recommended by Salesforce and this is known to cause issues with exporting custom attributes is not the root cause of why CustomField__c has no values under the header in the CSV file output, as it is not related to field access or Data Loader functionality. The developer does not have access to the object's metadata is not the root cause either, as it is not related to field access or Data Loader functionality. The object's metadata defines its structure and properties, such as fields, relationships, and layouts. The field is not populated is not the root cause either, as it contradicts the fact that CustomField__c has no column header in the CSV file output. If the field was not populated but accessible to the user, Data Loader would still include CustomField__c as a column header in the CSV file, but leave its values blank. Salesforce

Reference:Data Loader Guide: Export Data from Salesforce, [Data Loader Guide: Field Mapping], [Salesforce Help: Set Field-Level Security]

The correct answer for what is true about mapping custom fields from Cart to Order Summary is that the automatic Cart to Order mapping of custom fields can be disabled. A custom field is a field that is added by a developer or an administrator to an object to store additional information or data. A Cart is an object that represents a collection of products and charges that a customer intends to purchase in the storefront. An Order Summary is an object that represents a confirmed purchase of products and charges by a customer in the storefront. A Cart can be converted to an Order Summary when the customer completes the checkout process and confirms their order. By default, Salesforce B2B Commerce automatically maps custom fields from Cart to Order Summary when converting a Cart to an Order Summary. This means that any custom fields that exist on both Cart and Order Summary objects with identical API names and data types will have their values copied from Cart to Order Summary during the conversion. The automatic Cart to Order mapping of custom fields can be disabled by setting the B2BCommerce.CartToOrderMappingEnabled custom setting to false. This will prevent any custom fields from being copied from Cart to Order Summary during the conversion. A custom field must exist in the Cart and Order Summary objects only to be mapped successfully is not true, as it is not the only requirement for mapping custom fields from Cart to Order Summary. The custom fields must also have identical API names and data types, and the automatic Cart to Order mapping of custom fields must be enabled. All data types are supported for custom fields to be mapped from Cart to Order is not true, as some data types are not supported for mapping custom fields from Cart to Order Summary. The supported data types are Boolean, Date, DateTime, Double, Integer, Long, Percent, String, and TextArea. There is a limit of 25 custom fields on a Cart that can be mapped to Order is not true, as there is no such limit for mapping custom fields from Cart to Order Summary. Any number of custom fields that meet the mapping requirements can be mapped from Cart to Order Summary. Salesforce

Reference: [B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Custom Field Mapping], [B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Cart Object], [B2B Commerce Developer Guide: Order Summary Object]