ACAMS CAMS Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 7

List of questions
Question 61

What are the regulatory risks to a bank employee who willfully violates anti-money laundering laws?
Investigation and reputational damage
Fines and suspension from the industry
Criminal investigation and imprisonment
Enforcement actions including fines against the financial institution
A bank employee who willfully violates anti-money laundering laws faces the risk of criminal investigation and imprisonment, as these are serious offenses that could result in felony charges and penalties. According to the U.S.Department of Justice, individuals who knowingly violate the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) or other anti-money laundering laws could face up to 10 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $500,0001.Similarly, in other jurisdictions, such as the UK, Canada, and Australia, individuals who commit money laundering offenses could face imprisonment and/or fines234.
1: U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Resource Manual, Title 18 U.S.C. 1956. Laundering of Monetary Instruments,Section 21012: UK Government, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Part 7: Money Laundering Offences,Section 327-3293: Government of Canada, Criminal Code, Part XII.1: Laundering of Proceeds of Crime,Section 462.314: Australian Government, Criminal Code Act 1995, Chapter 10: National Infrastructure, Part 10.2: Money Laundering,Section 400.3-400.9
Penalties for AML/CFT violations, including criminal and civil penalties, fines, jail terms, as well as internal sanctions, such as disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.
Question 62

What are two requirements with respect to supporting documentation that is used to identify potentially suspicious activity, according to Financial Action Task Force? (Choose two.)
It must be retained for at least five years
It must be retained for at least seven years
It must be kept in a manner so that it can be provided promptly
It must only be released to the government through a subpoena process
20Recommendations%202012.pdf
Question 63

What are two reasons physical certificates present a money laundering risk to broker-dealers? (Choose two.)
The trade information on a physical certificate can be easily altered
Physical certificates do not expire and may be held by the owner for perpetuity
There is little information readily available to the broker confirming the source of the funds
Physical certificates may be provided to nominees for deposit or settled in off-market transactions
Physical certificates are documents that represent ownership of securities, such as stocks or bonds, that are issued by a company or a government. Physical certificates present a money laundering risk to broker-dealers for two reasons:
The trade information on a physical certificate can be easily altered, such as the name of the owner, the date of issuance, or the number of shares. This can facilitate the concealment or falsification of the origin, ownership, or value of the securities, and enable the laundering of illicit funds through the purchase or sale of the securities.
Physical certificates may be provided to nominees for deposit or settled in off-market transactions, such as private placements, bearer bonds, or direct transfers. This can bypass the normal reporting or recordkeeping requirements of the broker-dealer, and avoid the scrutiny or verification of the identity, source of funds, or beneficial ownership of the securities.
Two Reasons Physical Certificates Pose Money Laundering Risks to Broker ...
CAMS Certifications: How to Get CAMS Certified | ACAMS
ACAMS Online Certificates | ACAMS
Question 64

An automotive parts company in South America sends multiple $500,000 wire transfers per week to ABC
Holdings Ltd. in Asia referencing payment for silk flower shipments. Research reveals Sunrise Holdings, Ltd is registered in the British Virgin Islands with no available ownership information.
What are two red flags that indicate how trade-based money laundering could be occurring in this instance?
(Choose two.)
The transaction involves the use of front (or shell) companies
The packaging is inconsistent with the commodity or shipping method
Significant discrepancies appear between the description of the commodity on the bill of lading and the invoice
The type of commodity being shipped appears inconsistent with the exporter or importer's regular business activities
Trade-based money laundering (TBML) is a method of disguising and moving illicit funds through the international trade system. Criminals often manipulate various aspects of trade transactions, such as pricing, quantity, documentation, and commodity type, to transfer value and obscure the source of funds. Some of the common red flags that may indicate TBML are:
The transaction involves the use of front (or shell) companies: Front or shell companies are entities that have no physical presence, no employees, and no business activity, but are used to facilitate money laundering. They often have vague or generic names, are registered in secrecy jurisdictions, and have no available ownership information. In this case, ABC Holdings Ltd. and Sunrise Holdings Ltd. could be front or shell companies that are used to launder money through trade transactions.
The type of commodity being shipped appears inconsistent with the exporter or importer's regular business activities: Criminals may use commodities that are unrelated to their core business or that have low correlation with the market price to launder money. They may also use commodities that are difficult to value, verify, or trace, such as precious metals, gems, art, or antiquities. In this case, the automotive parts company and the silk flower supplier seem to have no logical connection, and the value of the silk flowers may be inflated or deflated to transfer funds.
Trade-Based Money Laundering: Risk Indicators - Financial Action Task Force, pp. 9-10, 14-15
Identifying TBML: 8 Trade-Based Money Laundering Red Flags - Alessa, pp. 1-2
FFIEC BSA/AML Appendices - Appendix F -- Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Red Flags, p. 7
AML Red Flags -- What are the Top 10 Indicators? - ComplyAdvantage, p. 1
Question 65

To ensure the independence of an audit for an AML program those involved in the audit would best be described as being:
not Involved in the organizations AML compliance program and having a reporting line to the board of directors or committee thereof
not involved in the organizations AML compliance program and having a reporting line to the organization's Chief Executive Officer
not involved in the organization's suspicious activity report filing process and having a reporting line to the board of directors or committee thereof.
not involved in the organization's suspicious activity report filing process and having a reporting line to the organization's Chief Executive Officer
Question 66

The branch manager calls the compliance officer and informs her that a law enforcement officer has just left the branch and was asking a lot of QUESTIO N N O:s and left a business card.
What should the compliance officer do?
What should the compliance officer do?
File a suspicious transaction report
Follow up to verify that the officer received all necessary information
Verify that the reported officer was an actual authorized representative
Require the branch manager to write a detailed memo about the request
According to the ACAMS study guide, one of the best practices for dealing with law enforcement inquiries is to verify the identity and authority of the law enforcement officer before providing any information (p. 224). This is to ensure that the inquiry is legitimate and not a phishing attempt or a breach of confidentiality. The compliance officer should also document the inquiry and the information provided, and consult with legal counsel if necessary. The other options are not appropriate, as they may either violate the law, compromise the investigation, or create unnecessary work.
ACAMS. (2020).Study Guide for the Certification Examination for Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (6th ed.). Miami, FL: ACAMS.
What Is An AML Officer1
Question 67

What is a major economic consequence of money laundering through the use of front companies?
Placing more emphasis on manufacturing
Weakening of the legitimate private sector
Creating a more competitive pricing environment
Aligning management principles between criminal enterprises and legitimate businesses
Undermining the Legitimate Private Sector: One of the most serious microeconomic effects of money laundering is felt in the private sector. Money launderers are known to use front companies: businesses that appear legitimate and engage in legitimate business but are in fact controlled by criminals who commingle the proceeds of illicit activity with legitimate funds to hide the ill-gotten gains. These front companies have a competitive advantage over legitimate firms as they have access to substantial illicit funds, allowing them to subsidize products and services sold at below market rates. This makes it difficult for legitimate businesses to compete against front companies. Clearly, the management principles of these criminal enterprises are not consistent with traditional free market principles, which results in further negative macroeconomic effects
Question 68

An institution is about to release a new peer to peer (P2P) funds transfer product to provide much needed remittance services to an under-banked population segment in the country.
The service allows customers to transfer funds through a mobile banking application to individuals worldwide entering only a name and mobile number. The new service charges less than comparable market solutions and offers real time transfer of funds. The customer onboarding process is conducted at branch locations with identity verification.
Which three present the highest anti-money laundering or sanctions risk and will require controls prior to launch? (Choose three.)
Customer onboarding
Cross-border functionality
Real time transfer of funds
Servicing the under-banked population
Limited access to counterparty information
The correct answer is B, C, and E, as these three present the highest anti-money laundering or sanctions risk and will require controls prior to launch.According to the FATF Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers1, P2P transactions pose significant challenges for AML/CFT compliance, as they may involve anonymous or pseudonymous parties, cross-border transfers, real-time settlement, and limited information on the beneficiaries. These factors increase the risk of money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanctions evasion, as well as the difficulty of detecting and reporting suspicious activity. Therefore, the institution should implement appropriate controls to mitigate these risks, such as:
Conducting enhanced due diligence on customers who use the P2P service, especially if they are located in high-risk jurisdictions or are involved in high-risk activities1.
Implementing transaction monitoring systems that can identify and flag unusual or suspicious patterns of behavior, such as large or frequent transfers, transfers to or from sanctioned entities or countries, or transfers that do not match the customer's profile or expected activity12.
Applying the travel rule, which requires the originator and beneficiary VASPs (or financial institutions) to exchange and retain information on the parties involved in the transfer, such as their names, account numbers, addresses, and national identification numbers13.
Establishing information-sharing and cooperation mechanisms with other VASPs, financial institutions, and regulators, to facilitate the exchange of relevant data and intelligence on P2P transactions and customers14.
Question 69

What is true regarding disclosure to a law enforcement agency by a financial institution of the supporting documentation for a suspicious transaction report?
Documentation must be provided as quickly as possible using email
The financial institution may notify the account holder of the request
Confirm that the request originated from a representative of the law enforcement agency
A copy of all the documentation released must also be provided to the account holder's attorney
Before disclosing any supporting documentation for a suspicious transaction report (STR) to a law enforcement agency, the financial institution should confirm that the request is legitimate and authorized by verifying the identity and credentials of the requester1. This is to prevent unauthorized access or misuse of the confidential information by impostors or fraudsters. The other options are not true, as they may either compromise the security, integrity, or timeliness of the disclosure, or violate the confidentiality or privacy rights of the customer.
ACAMS, CAMS Examination Study Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 4, p. 117
FATF Guidance: The Role of Hawala and Other Similar Service Providers in Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, October 20132, p. 20
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism, June 20173, p. 11
Question 70

As a result of an audit, a policy exception was identified that had been approved by the compliance officer.
The auditor determined that the policy exception is a violation of a regulatory requirement.
What should the auditor do?
Advise the compliance officer on how to appropriately respond to policy exceptions.
Include the regulatory violation in the audit report and report it to the board of directors.
Consult with legal counsel to determine if the approval of the policy exception was acceptable.
Include the regulatory violation in the audit report and recommend the compliance officer be subject to disciplinary action by the board of directors.
The auditor should include the regulatory violation in the audit report and report it to the board of directors. This is because the auditor has the responsibility to report any findings of non-compliance or material weaknesses in the institution's internal controls, policies, and procedures. The auditor should also provide recommendations for corrective actions and follow-up on their implementation.The board of directors has the ultimate oversight and accountability for the institution's compliance program and should be informed of any significant issues or risks that may affect the institution's reputation, operations, or regulatory status12.
1: CAMS Certification Package - 6th Edition | ACAMS, Chapter 6: Developing an Effective Anti-Money Laundering Program, p.125-1262: The Wolfsberg Group, The Wolfsberg Anti-Money Laundering Principles for Correspondent Banking, October 2014, p. 7, https://www.wolfsberg-principles.com/sites/default/files/wb/pdfs/Wolfsberg-Correspondent-Banking-Principles-2014.pdf
Question