Isaca CISM Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 21

The best response for the organization to reduce risk from increasing cyberattacks is to revalidate and mitigate risks to an acceptable level. This means that the organization should review its current risk profile, identify any new or emerging threats, vulnerabilities, or impacts, and evaluate the effectiveness of its existing controls and countermeasures. Based on this analysis, the organization should implement appropriate risk treatment strategies, such as avoiding, transferring, accepting, or reducing the risks, to achieve its desired risk appetite and tolerance. The organization should also monitor and review the risk situation and the implemented controls on a regular basis, and update its risk management plan accordingly.This approach is consistent with the ISACA Risk IT Framework, which provides guidance on how to align IT risk management with business objectives and value12.

The other options are not the best responses because they are either too narrow or too reactive. Increasing budget and staffing levels for the incident response team may improve the organization's ability to respond to and recover from cyberattacks, but it does not address the root causes or the prevention of the attacks. Implementing an intrusion detection system (IDS) may enhance the organization's detection and analysis capabilities, but it does not guarantee the protection or mitigation of the attacks. Testing the business continuity plan (BCP) may verify the organization's readiness and resilience to continue its critical operations in the event of a cyberattack, but it does not reduce the likelihood or the impact of the attack.Reference=

Risk IT Framework1

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition | Print | English2, Chapter 3: Information Risk Management, pages 97-98, 103-104, 107-108, 111-112.

= An identity and access management (IAM) system is a set of processes, policies, and technologies that enable an organization to manage the identities and access rights of its users across different systems and applications1.An IAM system can help an organization to comply with the government regulation by automating the provisioning and deprovisioning of user accounts, enforcing consistent access policies, and integrating different user directories2.An IAM system can also provide audit trails and reports to demonstrate compliance with the regulation3.A multi-factor authentication (MFA) system is a method of verifying the identity of a user by requiring two or more factors, such as something the user knows, has, or is4. An MFA system can enhance the security of user authentication, but it does not address the issue of removing user privileges from different systems within three days of termination. A privileged access management (PAM) system is a solution that manages and monitors the access of privileged users, such as administrators, to critical systems and resources. A PAM system can reduce the risk of unauthorized or malicious use of privileged accounts, but it does not solve the problem of managing the access of regular users across different systems. A governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) system is a software platform that integrates the functions of governance, risk management, and compliance management.A GRC system can help an organization to align its objectives, policies, and processes with the relevant regulations, standards, and best practices, but it does not directly enable the removal of user privileges from different systems within three days of termination.Reference=1: CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 242:13:24: CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 25 : CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 26 : CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 27

= The most important message to convey to employees in building a security risk-aware culture is that the responsibility for security rests with all employees, not just the information security function or the management. A security risk-aware culture is a collective mindset of the people in the organization working every day to protect the enterprise and its information assets from internal and external threats. A security risk-aware culture requires the workforce to know the security risks and the processes for avoiding or mitigating them, and to make thoughtful decisions that align with security policies and standards. A security risk-aware culture also incorporates a broader corporate culture of day-to-day actions that encourage employees to report security incidents, share security best practices, and participate in security awareness and training programs. A security risk-aware culture helps to reduce the human factor that causes 90 percent of all cyberattacks, and to offset the impact of corrupted or lost data, decreased revenue, regulatory fines, and reputational damage.A security risk-aware culture turns people from assets that must be protected into assets that actively contribute to the cybersecurity and risk management posture and elevate security to being a business enabler rather than a business impediment123.

Personal information requires different security controls than sensitive information is a true statement, but it is not the most important message to convey to employees in building a security risk-aware culture. Personal information is any information that can identify or relate to a natural person, such as name, address, email, phone number, social security number, etc. Sensitive information is any information that is confidential, proprietary, or has a high value or impact to the organization, such as trade secrets, financial data, customer data, intellectual property, etc. Different types of information may have different legal, regulatory, contractual, or ethical obligations to protect them from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction. Therefore, different security controls may be applied to personal and sensitive information based on their classification, such as encryption, access control, retention, disposal, etc. However, this message does not address the broader concept of security risk-aware culture, which is not limited to information classification and protection, but also encompasses the behaviors, attitudes, and values of the employees towards security.

Employee access should be based on the principle of least privilege is a good practice, but it is not the most important message to convey to employees in building a security risk-aware culture. The principle of least privilege states that users should only have the minimum level of access and permissions that are necessary to perform their job functions, and no more. This principle helps to reduce the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate actions, such as data leakage, fraud, sabotage, etc., by limiting the exposure and impact of user activities. However, this message does not capture the essence of security risk-aware culture, which is not only about access control, but also about the awareness, understanding, and commitment of the employees to security.

Understanding an information asset's value is critical to risk management is a valid point, but it is not the most important message to convey to employees in building a security risk-aware culture. Understanding an information asset's value is essential to determine the potential impact and likelihood of a security risk, and to prioritize the appropriate risk response strategies, such as avoidance, mitigation, transfer, or acceptance. However, this message does not reflect the holistic nature of security risk-aware culture, which is not only about risk assessment, but also about risk communication, risk treatment, and risk monitoring.Reference=

Building a Culture of Security - ISACA2

The Risk-Conscious, Security-Aware Culture: The Forgotten Critical Security Control - Cisco3

CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE - ISACA4

To overcome the perception that security is a hindrance to business activities, it is important for an information security manager to promote the relevance and contribution of security to the organization's goals and objectives. Security is not only a technical function, but also a business enabler that supports the organization's strategy, vision, and mission. By promoting the relevance and contribution of security, the information security manager can demonstrate the value and benefits of security to the stakeholders, such as increasing customer trust, enhancing reputation, reducing costs, improving efficiency, and complying with regulations. Promoting the relevance and contribution of security can also help the information security manager to build relationships and partnerships with the business units, and to align the security program with the business needs and expectations. Promoting the relevance and contribution of security can also help the information security manager to foster a positive security culture and awareness within the organization, and to encourage the adoption and support of security policies and practices.

The other options are not the best ways to overcome the perception that security is a hindrance to business activities. Relying on senior management to enforce security is not the best way, because it may create a sense of coercion and resentment among the employees, and may undermine the credibility and authority of the information security manager. Focusing on compliance is not the best way, because it may create a false sense of security and satisfaction, and may neglect the other aspects and dimensions of security, such as risk management, value creation, and innovation. Reiterating the necessity of security is not the best way, because it may not address the root causes and factors of the negative perception, and may not provide sufficient evidence and justification for the security investments and decisions.Reference= CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, pp.13-14, 23-241; CISM Online Review Course, Domain 1: Information Security Governance, Module 1: Information Security Governance Overview, ISACA2

To overcome the perception that security is a hindrance to business activities, it is important for an information security manager to promote the relevance and contribution of security. By demonstrating the value that security brings to the organization, including protecting assets and supporting business objectives, the information security manager can help to change the perception of security from a hindrance to a critical component of business success.

Relying on senior management to enforce security, focusing on compliance, and reiterating the necessity of security are all important elements of a comprehensive security program, but they do not directly address the perception that security is a hindrance to business activities. By promoting the relevance and contribution of security, the information security manager can help to align security with the overall goals and objectives of the organization, and foster a culture that values and supports security initiatives.

The most likely reason for executive management to take no further action related to the risk of a denial of service (DoS) attack is that the cost of implementing controls exceeds the potential financial losses. This means that the risk is acceptable or tolerable for the organization, and that the benefits of reducing the risk do not outweigh the costs of applying the controls. This decision is based on a cost-benefit analysis, which is a common technique for evaluating and comparing different risk response options. A cost-benefit analysis considers the following factors:

The estimated impact of the risk, which is the potential loss or damage that the organization may suffer if the risk materializes. The impact can be expressed in quantitative or qualitative terms, such as monetary value, reputation, customer satisfaction, legal liability, etc.

The estimated likelihood of occurrence, which is the probability or frequency that the risk will occur within a given time period. The likelihood can be expressed in numerical or descriptive terms, such as percentage, rating, high, medium, low, etc.

The estimated cost of controls, which is the total amount of resources that the organization needs to invest in order to implement and maintain the controls. The cost can include direct and indirect expenses, such as hardware, software, personnel, training, maintenance, etc.

The estimated benefit of controls, which is the reduction in the impact or likelihood of the risk as a result of implementing the controls. The benefit can be expressed in the same terms as the impact or likelihood, such as monetary value, percentage, rating, etc.

A cost-benefit analysis can be performed using various methods, such as net present value (NPV), return on investment (ROI), internal rate of return (IRR), etc. The general principle is to compare the cost and benefit of each control option, and select the one that provides the highest net benefit or the lowest net cost. A control option is considered feasible and desirable if its benefit exceeds its cost, or if its cost is lower than the impact of the risk.

In this case, executive management has decided to take no further action related to the risk of a DoS attack, which implies that the cost of implementing controls exceeds the potential financial losses. This could be because the impact or likelihood of the risk is low, or because the cost or complexity of the controls is high, or both. For example, the organization may have a robust backup and recovery system, a diversified network infrastructure, a strong customer loyalty, or a low dependency on online services, which reduce the impact or likelihood of a DoS attack. Alternatively, the organization may face technical, financial, or operational challenges in implementing effective controls, such as firewalls, load balancers, traffic filters, or cloud services, which increase the cost or complexity of the controls. Therefore, executive management may have concluded that the risk is acceptable or tolerable, and that taking no further action is the most rational and economical choice.

The other options are not the most likely reasons for executive management to take no further action related to the risk of a DoS attack, as they indicate a lack of proper risk assessment or validation. The risk assessment should define the likelihood of occurrence and the reported vulnerability should be validated, as these are essential steps for identifying and analyzing the risk. Executive management should be aware of the impact potential, as this is a key factor for evaluating and prioritizing the risk. If any of these options were true, executive management would not have enough information or evidence to make an informed and justified decision about the risk response.Reference=

CISM Review Manual, Chapter 2, pages 67-69

CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA, Domain 2, Task 2.2

Information Security Risk Management for CISM - Pluralsight, Module 2, Section 2.3

CISM: Information Risk Management Part 2 from Skillsoft - NICCS, Section 2.4

Executive management may not take action related to a risk if they have determined that the cost of implementing necessary controls to mitigate the risk exceeds the potential financial losses that the organization may incur if the risk were to materialize. In cases such as this, it is important for the information security team to provide the executive team with thorough cost-benefit analysis that outlines the cost of implementing the controls versus the expected losses from the risk.

The level of protection for an information asset should be based on the impact to the business function that depends on the asset. The impact to the business function reflects the value and criticality of the information asset to the organization, and the potential consequences of its loss, compromise, or unavailability. The impact to the business function can be measured in terms of financial, operational, reputational, legal, or strategic effects. The higher the impact, the higher the level of protection required.

Impact on information security program, cost of controls, and cost to replace are not the best factors to provide guidance when deciding the level of protection for an information asset. Impact on information security program is a secondary effect that depends on the impact to the business function. Cost of controls and cost to replace are important considerations for implementing and maintaining the protection, but they do not determine the level of protection needed.Cost of controls and cost to replace should be balanced with the impact to the business function and the risk appetite of the organization.Reference= CISM Certified Information Security Manager Study Guide, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, page 671; CISM Foundations: Module 2 Course, Part One: Information Risk Management2; CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, page 693

When deciding the level of protection for an information asset, the most important factor to consider is the impact to the business function. The value of the asset should be evaluated in terms of its importance to the organization's operations and how its security posture affects the organization's overall security posture. Additionally, the cost of implementing controls, the potential impact on the information security program, and the cost to replace the asset should be taken into account when determining the appropriate level of protection for the asset.

The most effective way to demonstrate alignment of information security strategy with business objectives is to use a balanced scorecard. A balanced scorecard is a strategic management tool that translates the vision and mission of an organization into a set of performance indicators that measure its progress towards its goals. A balanced scorecard typically includes four perspectives: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth. Each perspective has a set of objectives, measures, targets, and initiatives that are aligned with the organization's strategy. A balanced scorecard helps to communicate, monitor, and evaluate the performance of the organization and its information security program in relation to its business objectives.A balanced scorecard also helps to identify and prioritize improvement opportunities, as well as to align the activities and resources of the organization with its strategy12.

The other options are not the most effective ways to demonstrate alignment of information security strategy with business objectives. A risk matrix is a tool that displays the likelihood and impact of various risks on a two-dimensional grid. A risk matrix helps to assess and prioritize risks, as well as to determine the appropriate risk response strategies.However, a risk matrix does not show how the information security strategy supports the business objectives, nor does it measure the performance or the value of the information security program3. Benchmarking is a process of comparing the performance, practices, or processes of an organization with those of other organizations or industry standards. Benchmarking helps to identify best practices, gaps, and areas for improvement, as well as to set realistic and achievable goals.However, benchmarking does not show how the information security strategy aligns with the business objectives, nor does it reflect the unique characteristics and needs of the organization4. A heat map is a graphical representation of data using colors to indicate the intensity or frequency of a variable. A heat map can be used to visualize the distribution, concentration, or variation of risks, controls, or incidents across different dimensions, such as business units, processes, or assets. A heat map helps to highlight the areas of high risk or low control effectiveness, as well as to facilitate decision making and resource allocation.However, a heat map does not show how the information security strategy contributes to the business objectives, nor does it measure the outcomes or the benefits of the information security program5.Reference=

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition | Print | English2, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, pages 28-29, 31-32, 34-35.

Balanced Scorecard - Wikipedia1

Risk Matrix - Wikipedia3

Benchmarking - Wikipedia4

Heat map - Wikipedia5

= According to the CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 9, an information security steering committee is a group of senior managers from different business units and functions who provide guidance and oversight for the information security program. An information security steering committee is the best approach to make strategic information security decisions because it can:

Ensure alignment of information security strategy with business objectives and risk appetite1

Facilitate communication and collaboration among different stakeholders and promote information security awareness and culture2

Provide direction and support for information security initiatives and projects3

Monitor and review the performance and effectiveness of the information security program4

Resolve conflicts and issues related to information security policies and practices5

Establishing regular information security status reporting, business unit security working groups, and periodic senior management meetings are useful activities for information security management, but they are not sufficient to make strategic information security decisions without the involvement and guidance of an information security steering committee.Reference=1: CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 92:13:24:35:4

An Information Security Steering Committee is a group of stakeholders responsible for providing governance and guidance to the organization on all matters related to information security. The committee provides oversight and guidance on security policies, strategies, and technology implementation. It also ensures that the organization is in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. Additionally, it serves as a forum for discussing security-related issues and ensures that security is taken into account when making strategic decisions.

= Establishing an information security strategy committee is the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program because it involves the participation and collaboration of key stakeholders from different business functions and levels who can provide input, guidance, and endorsement for the security program. An information security strategy committee is a governance body that oversees the development, implementation, and maintenance of the security program and aligns it with the organization's strategic objectives, risk appetite, and culture. An information security strategy committee can help to obtain support for the security program by:

Communicating the vision, mission, and goals of the security program to the organization and demonstrating its value and benefits.

Establishing roles and responsibilities for the security program and ensuring accountability and ownership.

Securing adequate resources and budget for the security program and allocating them appropriately.

Resolving conflicts and issues that may arise during the security program execution and ensuring alignment with other business processes and initiatives.

Monitoring and evaluating the performance and effectiveness of the security program and ensuring continuous improvement and adaptation.

Benchmarking against similar industry organizations is a useful technique to compare and improve the security program, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. Benchmarking involves measuring and analyzing the security program's processes, practices, and outcomes against those of other organizations that have similar characteristics, objectives, or challenges. Benchmarking can help to identify gaps, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the security program and to adopt best practices and standards that can enhance the security program's performance and maturity. However, benchmarking alone does not guarantee the support or acceptance of the security program by the organization, as it may not reflect the organization's specific needs, risks, or culture.

Delivering an information security awareness campaign is a vital component of the security program, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. An information security awareness campaign is a set of activities and initiatives that aim to educate and inform the organization's workforce and other relevant parties about the security program's policies, standards, procedures, and guidelines, as well as the security risks, threats, and incidents that may affect the organization. An information security awareness campaign can help to increase the security knowledge, skills, and behaviors of the organization's members and to foster a security risk-aware culture. However, an information security awareness campaign is not sufficient to obtain support for the security program, as it may not address the strategic, operational, or financial aspects of the security program or the expectations and interests of the different stakeholders.

Publishing an information security RACI chart is a helpful tool to define and communicate the security program's roles and responsibilities, but it is not the best way to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. A RACI chart is a matrix that assigns the level of involvement and accountability for each task or activity in the security program to each role or stakeholder. RACI stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed, which are the four possible levels of participation. A RACI chart can help to clarify the expectations, obligations, and authority of each role or stakeholder in the security program and to avoid duplication, confusion, or conflict. However, a RACI chart does not ensure the support or commitment of the roles or stakeholders for the security program, as it may not address the benefits, challenges, or resources of the security program or the feedback and input of the roles or stakeholders.Reference=

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 97-98, 103-104, 107-108, 111-112

Information Security Governance: Guidance for Boards of Directors and Executive Management, 2nd Edition - ISACA1

Information Security Strategy: The Key to Success - ISACA2

Deliver an information security awareness campaign is the BEST approach to obtain support for a new organization-wide information security program. An information security awareness campaign is a great way to raise awareness of the importance of information security and the impact it can have on an organization. It helps to ensure that all stakeholders understand the importance of information security and are aware of the risks associated with it. Additionally, an effective awareness campaign can help to ensure that everyone in the organization is aware of the cybersecurity policies, procedures, and best practices that must be followed.