Isaca CISM Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 4

The best indicator that information assets are classified accurately is appropriate prioritization of information risk treatment. Information asset classification is the process of assigning a level of sensitivity or criticality to information assets based on their value, impact, and legal or regulatory requirements. The purpose of information asset classification is to facilitate the identification and protection of information assets according to their importance and risk exposure. Therefore, if information assets are classified accurately, the organization can prioritize the information risk treatment activities and allocate the resources accordingly.The other options are not direct indicators of information asset classification accuracy, although they may be influenced by it.Reference= CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 671; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, Question ID: 1031

= A post-incident review is a process of analyzing and learning from a security incident, such as a data breach, to improve the security posture and resilience of an organization.A post-incident review should include the following elements12:

A clear and accurate description of the incident, including its scope, impact, timeline, root cause, and contributing factors.

A detailed assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the incident response process, including the roles and responsibilities, communication channels, coordination mechanisms, escalation procedures, tools and resources, documentation, and reporting.

An evaluation of the adequacy of existing controls, such as policies, standards, procedures, technical measures, awareness, and training, to prevent, detect, and mitigate similar incidents in the future.

A list of actionable recommendations and improvement plans, based on the lessons learned and best practices, to address the identified gaps and weaknesses in the security strategy, governance, risk management, and incident management.

A follow-up and monitoring mechanism to ensure the implementation and verification of the recommendations and improvement plans.

The most important element to include in a post-incident review following a data breach is the evaluation of the adequacy of existing controls, because it directly relates to the security objectives and requirements of the organization, and provides the basis for enhancing the security posture and resilience of the organization. Evaluating the existing controls helps to identify the vulnerabilities and risks that led to the data breach, and to determine the appropriate corrective and preventive actions to reduce the likelihood and impact of similar incidents in the future. Evaluating the existing controls also helps to align the security strategy and governance with the business goals and objectives, and to ensure the compliance with legal, regulatory, and contractual obligations.

The other elements, such as an evaluation of the effectiveness of the information security strategy, documentation of regulatory reporting requirements, and a review of the forensics chain of custody, are also important, but not as important as the evaluation of the existing controls. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the information security strategy is a broader and more strategic activity that may not be directly relevant to the specific incident, and may require more time and resources to conduct. Documentation of regulatory reporting requirements is a necessary and mandatory task, but it does not provide much insight or value for improving the security posture and resilience of the organization.A review of the forensics chain of custody is a technical and procedural activity that ensures the integrity and admissibility of the digital evidence collected during the incident investigation, but it does not address the root cause or the mitigation of the incident.Reference=1: CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA2: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 147

= The primary area of focus when mitigating security risks associated with emerging technologies is unknown vulnerabilities. Emerging technologies are new and complex, and often involve multiple parties, interdependencies, and uncertainties.Therefore, they may have unknown vulnerabilities that could expose the organization to threats that are difficult to predict, detect, or prevent1.Unknown vulnerabilities could also result from the lack of experience, knowledge, or best practices in implementing, operating, or securing emerging technologies2.Unknown vulnerabilities could lead to serious consequences, such as data breaches, system failures, reputational damage, legal liabilities, or regulatory sanctions3. Therefore, it is important to focus on identifying, assessing, and addressing unknown vulnerabilities when mitigating security risks associated with emerging technologies.

The other options are not as important as unknown vulnerabilities, because they are either more predictable, manageable, or specific. Compatibility with legacy systems is a technical issue that could affect the performance, functionality, or reliability of emerging technologies, but it is not a security risk per se.It could be resolved by testing, upgrading, or replacing legacy systems4. Application of corporate hardening standards is a security measure that could reduce the attack surface and improve the resilience of emerging technologies, but it is not a sufficient or comprehensive solution. It could be limited by the availability, applicability, or effectiveness of the standards. Integration with existing access controls is a security requirement that could prevent unauthorized or inappropriate access to emerging technologies, but it is not a guarantee of security.It could be challenged by the complexity, diversity, or dynamism of the access scenarios.Reference=1: Performing Risk Assessments of Emerging Technologies - ISACA2: Assessing the Risk of Emerging Technology - ISACA3: Factors Influencing Public Risk Perception of Emerging Technologies: A ...4: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.3 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.4 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.5

An information security dashboard is the most effective way to present quarterly reports to the board on the status of the information security program, because it provides a concise, visual, and high-level overview of the key performance indicators (KPIs), metrics, and trends of the information security program. An information security dashboard can help the board to quickly and easily understand the current state, progress, and performance of the information security program, and to identify any gaps, issues, or areas of improvement. An information security dashboard can also help the board to align the information security program with the organization's business goals and strategies, and to support the decision-making and oversight functions of the board.

A capability and maturity assessment is a way of measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of the information security program, and of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the program. However, a capability and maturity assessment is not the most effective way to present quarterly reports to the board, because it may not provide a clear and timely picture of the status of the information security program, and it may not reflect the changes and dynamics of the information security environment. A capability and maturity assessment is more suitable for periodic or annual reviews, rather than quarterly reports.

A detailed analysis of security program KPIs is a way of evaluating the performance and progress of the information security program, and of determining the extent to which the program meets the predefined objectives and targets. However, a detailed analysis of security program KPIs is not the most effective way to present quarterly reports to the board, because it may be too technical, complex, or lengthy for the board to comprehend and appreciate. A detailed analysis of security program KPIs is more suitable for operational or tactical level reporting, rather than strategic level reporting.

An information security risk register is a tool for recording and tracking the information security risks that affect the organization, and for documenting the risk assessment, treatment, and monitoring activities. However, an information security risk register is not the most effective way to present quarterly reports to the board, because it may not provide a comprehensive and balanced view of the information security program, and it may not highlight the achievements and benefits of the program. An information security risk register is more suitable for risk management or audit purposes, rather than performance reporting.Reference=

ISACA, CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, 2020, pages 47-48, 59-60, 63-64, 67-68.

ISACA, CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, 12th Edition, 2020, question ID 1019.

An information security dashboard is an effective way to present quarterly reports to the board on the status of the information security program. It allows the board to quickly view key metrics and trends at a glance and to drill down into more detailed information as needed. The dashboard should include metrics such as total incidents, patching compliance, vulnerability scanning results, and more. It should also include high-level overviews of the security program and its components, such as the security policy, security architecture, and security controls.

= The method of operation used by the attacker is the most useful information for an information security manager when conducting a post-incident review of an attack. This information can help identify the root cause of the incident, the vulnerabilities exploited, the impact and severity of the attack, and the effectiveness of the existing security controls. The method of operation can also provide insights into the attacker's motives, skills, and resources, which can help improve the organization's threat intelligence and risk assessment. The cost of the attack to the organization, the location of the attacker, and the details from IDS logs are all relevant information for a post-incident review, but they are not as useful as the method of operation for improving the incident handling process and preventing future attacks.Reference=CISM Review Manual 2022, page 316;CISM Item Development Guide 2022, page 9;ISACA CISM: PRIMARY goal of a post-incident review should be to?

= Annual loss expectancy (ALE) is the most important criterion when deciding whether to accept residual risk, because it represents the expected monetary loss for an asset due to a risk over a one-year period. ALE is calculated by multiplying the annual rate of occurrence (ARO) of a risk event by the single loss expectancy (SLE) of the asset. ARO is the estimated frequency of a risk event occurring within a one-year period, and SLE is the estimated cost of a single occurrence of a risk event. ALE helps to compare the cost and benefit of different risk responses, such as avoidance, mitigation, transfer, or acceptance. Risk acceptance is appropriate when the ALE is lower than the cost of other risk responses, or when the risk is unavoidable or acceptable within the organization's risk appetite and tolerance. ALE also helps to prioritize the risks that need more attention and resources.

Reference= CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Assessment, page 831; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 22, page 242

The most important thing to include in the outsourcing agreement for disaster recovery activities is the recovery time objectives (RTOs). RTOs are the maximum acceptable time frames within which the critical business processes and information systems must be restored after a disaster or disruption. RTOs are based on the business impact analysis (BIA) and the risk assessment, and they reflect the business continuity requirements and expectations of the organization. By including the RTOs in the outsourcing agreement, the organization can ensure that the service provider is aware of and committed to meeting the agreed service levels and minimizing the downtime and losses in the event of a disaster.The other options are not as important as the RTOs, although they may be relevant and useful to include in the outsourcing agreement depending on the scope and nature of the disaster recovery services.Reference= CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 2471; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Database - 12 Month Subscription, Question ID: 1033

A gap analysis is a process of comparing the current state of an organization's security posture with the desired or required state, and identifying the gaps or discrepancies that need to be addressed.A gap analysis helps to determine the current level of compliance with relevant regulations, standards, and best practices, and to prioritize the actions and resources needed to achieve the desired level of compliance1.A gap analysis should be performed first when developing a security strategy in support of a new service that is subject to regulations, because it provides the following benefits2:

It helps to understand the scope and impact of the new service on the organization's security objectives, risks, and controls.

It helps to identify the legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements that apply to the new service, and the potential penalties or consequences of non-compliance.

It helps to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the existing security controls, and to identify the gaps or weaknesses that need to be remediated or enhanced.

It helps to align the security strategy with the business goals and objectives of the new service, and to ensure the security strategy is consistent and coherent across the organization.

It helps to communicate the security requirements and expectations to the stakeholders involved in the new service, and to obtain their support and commitment.

The other options, such as determining security controls for the new service, establishing a compliance program, or hiring new resources to support the service, are not the first steps when developing a security strategy in support of a new service that is subject to regulations, because they depend on the results and recommendations of the gap analysis. Determining security controls for the new service requires a clear understanding of the security requirements and risks associated with the new service, which can be obtained from the gap analysis. Establishing a compliance program requires a systematic and structured approach to implement, monitor, and improve the security controls and processes that ensure compliance, which can be based on the gap analysis.Hiring new resources to support the service requires a realistic and justified estimation of the human and financial resources needed to achieve the security objectives and compliance, which can be derived from the gap analysis.Reference=1: What is a Gap Analysis?| Smartsheet2: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 121 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 122 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 123 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 124 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 125

Learn more:

1. infosectrain.com2. resources.infosecinstitute.com3. resources.infosecinstitute.com4. resources.infosecinstitute.com+2more

A capability maturity model (CMM) is a framework that helps organizations assess and improve their processes and capabilities in various domains, such as software development, project management, information security, and others1. A CMM defines a set of levels or stages that represent the degree of maturity or effectiveness of an organization's processes and capabilities in a specific domain. Each level has a set of criteria or characteristics that an organization must meet to achieve that level of maturity.A CMM also provides guidance and best practices on how to progress from one level to another, and how to measure and monitor the performance and improvement of the processes and capabilities2.

A CMM is most helpful in determining an organization's current capacity to mitigate risks, because it provides a systematic and objective way to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the organization's processes and capabilities related to risk management. A CMM can help an organization identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement in its risk management practices, and prioritize the actions and resources needed to address them.A CMM can also help an organization benchmark its risk management maturity against industry standards or best practices, and demonstrate its compliance with regulatory or contractual requirements3.

The other options are not as helpful as a CMM in determining an organization's current capacity to mitigate risks, because they are either more specific, limited, or dependent on a CMM. A vulnerability assessment is a process of identifying and analyzing the vulnerabilities in an organization's systems, networks, or applications, and their potential impact on the organization's assets, operations, or reputation.A vulnerability assessment can help an organization identify the sources and levels of risk, but it does not provide a comprehensive or holistic view of the organization's risk management maturity or effectiveness4. IT security risk and exposure is a measure of the likelihood and impact of a security breach or incident on an organization's IT assets, operations, or reputation.IT security risk and exposure can help an organization quantify and communicate the level of risk, but it does not provide a framework or guidance on how to improve the organization's risk management processes or capabilities5. A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process of identifying and evaluating the potential effects of a disruption or disaster on an organization's critical business functions, processes, or resources.A BIA can help an organization determine the priorities and requirements for business continuity and disaster recovery, but it does not provide a method or standard for assessing or enhancing the organization's risk management maturity or effectiveness.Reference=1: CMMI Institute - What is CMMI?- Capability Maturity Model Integration2: Capability Maturity Model and Risk Register Integration: The Right ...3: Performing Risk Assessments of Emerging Technologies - ISACA4: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.25: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.3 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.4