Amazon DOP-C02 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 18

Mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication requires two-way authentication between the client and the server. For Amazon API Gateway, you can enable mTLS for a custom domain name, which requires clients to present X.509 certificates to verify their identity to access your API. To set up mTLS, you would typically use AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) to create a private certificate authority (CA) and provision a client certificate signed by this private CA.The root CA certificate is then uploaded to an Amazon S3 bucket and configured in API Gateway as the trust store12.

Introducing mutual TLS authentication for Amazon API Gateway1.

Configuring mutual TLS authentication for a REST API2.

AWS Private Certificate Authority details3.

AWS Certificate Manager Private Certificate Authority updates4.

The most operationally efficient solution is to use AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store1to store the AMI ID and reference it in the launch template2. This way, the launch template does not need to be updated every time a new AMI is created by Image Builder.Instead, the Image Builder pipeline can update the Parameter Store value with the newest AMI ID3, and the Auto Scaling group can launch instances using the latest value from Parameter Store.

The other solutions require updating the launch template or creating a new version of it every time a new AMI is created, which adds complexity and overhead. Additionally, using EventBridge rules and Lambda functions or Run Command documents introduces additional dependencies and potential points of failure.

The best solution is to use S3 Object Lambda1, which allows you to add your own code to S3 GET, LIST, and HEAD requests to modify and process data as it is returned to an application2. This way, you can redact the data differently for each application without creating and storing multiple copies of the data or running proxies.

The other solutions are less efficient or scalable because they require replicating the data to multiple buckets, streaming the data through Kinesis, or storing the data in S3 access points.

The best solution to log and review all stopped tasks for errors is to use Amazon EventBridge and Amazon CloudWatch Logs. Amazon EventBridge allows the DevOps engineer to create a rule that matches task state change events from Amazon ECS. The rule can then send the event data to Amazon CloudWatch Logs as the target. Amazon CloudWatch Logs can store and monitor the log data, and also provide CloudWatch Logs Insights, a feature that enables the DevOps engineer to interactively search and analyze the log data. Using CloudWatch Logs Insights, the DevOps engineer can filter and aggregate the log data based on various fields, such as cluster, task, container, and reason. This way, the DevOps engineer can easily identify and investigate the stopped tasks and their errors.

The other options are not as effective or efficient as the solution in option A. Option B is not suitable because the embedded metric format is designed for custom metrics, not for logging task state changes. Option C is not feasible because the EC2 instances do not store the task state change events in their logs. Option D is not relevant because the EC2_INSTANCE_TERMINATING lifecycle hook is triggered when an EC2 instance is terminated by the Auto Scaling group, not when a task is stopped by Amazon ECS.

: Creating a CloudWatch Events Rule That Triggers on an Event - Amazon Elastic Container Service

: Sending and Receiving Events Between AWS Accounts - Amazon EventBridge

: Working with Log Data - Amazon CloudWatch Logs

: Analyzing Log Data with CloudWatch Logs Insights - Amazon CloudWatch Logs

: Embedded Metric Format - Amazon CloudWatch

: Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling Lifecycle Hooks - Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling

To enable cross-account backup, the company needs to grant permissions to both the backup vault and the KMS key in the destination account. The backup vault access policy in the destination account must allow the primary account to copy backups into the vault. The key policy of the KMS key in the destination account must allow the primary account to use the key to encrypt and decrypt the backups.These steps are described in the AWS documentation12. Therefore, the correct answer is A and E.

1: Creating backup copies across AWS accounts - AWS Backup

2: Using AWS Backup with AWS Organizations - AWS Backup

The latency in processing and ingesting logs can be caused by several factors, such as the throughput of the Kinesis data stream, the concurrency of the Lambda function, and the configuration of the event source mapping. To reduce the latency, the following steps can be taken:

Create a data stream consumer with enhanced fan-out. Set the Lambda function that processes the logs as the consumer.This will allow the Lambda function to receive records from the data stream with dedicated throughput of up to 2 MB per second per shard, independent of other consumers1. This will reduce the contention and delay in accessing the data stream.

Increase the ParallelizationFactor setting in the Lambda event source mapping.This will allow the Lambda service to invoke more instances of the function concurrently to process the records from the data stream2. This will increase the processing capacity and reduce the backlog of records in the data stream.

Configure reserved concurrency for the Lambda function that processes the logs.This will ensure that the function has enough concurrency available to handle the increased load from the data stream3. This will prevent the function from being throttled by the account-level concurrency limit.

The other options are not effective or may have negative impacts on the latency.Option D is not suitable because increasing the batch size in the Kinesis data stream will increase the amount of data that the Lambda function has to process in each invocation, which may increase the execution time and latency4. Option E is not advisable because turning off the ReportBatchItemFailures setting in the Lambda event source mapping will prevent the Lambda service from retrying the failed records, which may result in data loss. Option F is not necessary because increasing the number of shards in the Kinesis data stream will increase the throughput of the data stream, but it will not affect the processing speed of the Lambda function, which is the bottleneck in this scenario.

1: Using AWS Lambda with Amazon Kinesis Data Streams - AWS Lambda

2: AWS Lambda event source mappings - AWS Lambda

3: Managing concurrency for a Lambda function - AWS Lambda

4: AWS Lambda function scaling - AWS Lambda

: AWS Lambda event source mappings - AWS Lambda

: Scaling Amazon Kinesis Data Streams with AWS CloudFormation - Amazon Kinesis Data Streams

The best solution to implement failover for the application is to use CloudFront origin groups.Origin groups allow CloudFront to automatically switch to a secondary origin when the primary origin is unavailable or returns specific HTTP status codes that indicate a failure1. This way, CloudFront can serve the requests from the secondary ALB in the secondary Region without any delay or redirection. To set up origin groups, the DevOps engineer needs to create a new origin on the distribution for the secondary ALB, create a new origin group with the original ALB as the primary origin and the secondary ALB as the secondary origin, and configure the origin group to fail over for HTTP 5xx status codes.Then, the DevOps engineer needs to update the default behavior to use the origin group instead of the single origin2.

The other options are not as effective or efficient as the solution in option B. Option A is not suitable because creating a second CloudFront distribution will increase the complexity and cost of the application. Moreover, using Route 53 alias records with a failover policy will introduce some delay in detecting and switching to the secondary CloudFront distribution, which may not meet the zero-second RTO requirement.Option C is not feasible because CloudFront does not support using Route 53 alias records as origins3. Option D is not advisable because using a CloudFront function to redirect the requests to the secondary ALB will add an extra round-trip and latency to the failover process, which may also not meet the zero-second RTO requirement.

1: Optimizing high availability with CloudFront origin failover - Amazon CloudFront

2: Creating an origin group - Amazon CloudFront

3: Values That You Specify When You Create or Update a Web Distribution - Amazon CloudFront

The correct answer is B and C. Option B is correct because inviting the acquired company's AWS accounts to join the organization and creating the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role in the invited accounts allows the management account to assume the role and gain full administrative access to the member accounts. Option C is correct because using AWS Security Hub to collect and group findings across all accounts enables the DevOps team to monitor and improve the security posture of the organization. Security Hub can automatically detect new accounts as the accounts are added to the organization and enable Security Hub for them. Option A is incorrect because creating an SCP that has full administrative privileges and attaching it to the management account does not grant the management account access to the member accounts. SCPs are used to restrict the permissions of the member accounts, not to grant permissions to the management account. Option D is incorrect because using AWS Firewall Manager to collect and group findings across all accounts is not a valid use case for Firewall Manager. Firewall Manager is used to centrally configure and manage firewall rules across the organization, not to collect and group security findings. Option E is incorrect because using Amazon Inspector to collect and group findings across all accounts is not a valid use case for Amazon Inspector. Amazon Inspector is used to assess the security and compliance of applications running on Amazon EC2 instances, not to collect and group security findings across accounts.Reference:

Inviting an AWS account to join your organization

Enabling and disabling AWS Security Hub

Service control policies

AWS Firewall Manager

Amazon Inspector

Short To improve the performance of the application, the DevOps engineer should use Amazon RDS Proxy, implement the database connection opening outside the Lambda event handler code, and connect to the proxy endpoint from the Lambda function.

Amazon RDS Proxy is a fully managed, highly available database proxy for Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) that makes applications more scalable, more resilient to database failures, and more secure1. By using Amazon RDS Proxy, the DevOps engineer can reduce the overhead of opening and closing connections to the database, which can improve latency and throughput2.

The DevOps engineer should connect the proxy to the Aurora cluster reader endpoint, which allows read-only connections to one of the Aurora Replicas in the DB cluster3. This can help balance the load across multiple read replicas and improve performance for read-intensive workloads4.

The DevOps engineer should implement the database connection opening outside the Lambda event handler code, which means using a global variable to store the database connection object5. This can enable connection reuse across multiple invocations of the Lambda function, which can reduce latency and improve performance.

The DevOps engineer should connect to the proxy endpoint from the Lambda function, which is a unique URL that represents the proxy. This can allow the Lambda function to access the database through the proxy, which can provide benefits such as connection pooling, load balancing, failover handling, and enhanced security.

The other options are incorrect because:

Implementing database connection pooling inside the Lambda code is unnecessary and redundant when using Amazon RDS Proxy, which already provides connection pooling as a service.

Implementing the database connection opening and closing inside the Lambda event handler code is inefficient and costly, as it can increase latency and consume more resources for each invocation of the Lambda function.

Connecting to the Aurora cluster endpoint from the Lambda function is not optimal for read-only queries, as it can direct traffic to either the primary instance or one of the Aurora Replicas in the DB cluster. This can result in inconsistent performance and potential conflicts with write operations on the primary instance.