Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 Practice Test - Questions Answers

For Disaster Recovery to function correctly, the source and destination storage containers must have identical names.

Option C (Storage container name mismatch) is correct:

If the storage container name at the DR site does not match, Nutanix cannot map snapshots and replication data.

This causes failover operations to fail, even though data exists.

Option A (NGT not installed) is incorrect:

NGT is needed for application-consistent snapshots, but not required for crash-consistent snapshots.

Option B (Windows updates) is incorrect:

OS updates do not affect replication availability.

Option D (Storage RF factor mismatch) is incorrect:

Replication works across different RF factors, but performance may vary.

Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide Requirements for Remote Replication

Nutanix KB Storage Container Mapping for Protection Domains

Moving vDisks to a storage container with compression enabled ensures better data efficiency without downtime.

Option A (Migrate vDisks) is correct:

vDisk migration is non-disruptive and allows compression settings to be applied dynamically.

Option B (Recreate the VM) is incorrect:

Rebuilding the VM is unnecessary and would cause downtime.

Option C (Migrate the VM) is incorrect:

VM migration does not guarantee that only vDisks move, and it may disrupt performance.

Option D (Recreate vDisk) is incorrect:

This method is manual and time-consuming, while Nutanix provides an automated approach.

Nutanix Storage Optimization Guide Enabling Compression on Existing vDisks

Nutanix KB Migrate vDisks Between Storage Containers for Optimization

The exhibit shows that the overall runway is only 66 days, meaning that the current cluster does not have enough capacity to sustain workloads for 6 months, let alone 9 months.

The best solution is to add resources to the cluster (Option A), such as CPU, memory, or storage, to extend the runway.

Postponing new workloads (Option B) may help in the short term but does not align with the business need to continue adding workloads.

Deleting workloads (Option C) is not a viable option because the customer wants to add more, not remove them.

Changing the target to 9 months (Option D) does not change the actual resource constraints; it only alters the target timeframe.

Nutanix Prism Central Capacity Planning and Runway Analysis

Nutanix Bible Cluster Resource Management and Scaling

Nutanix Support KB How to Extend Cluster Runway with Resource Scaling

For Metro Availability to work properly, the storage containers at both the primary and secondary sites must meet certain requirements:

The storage containers must have the same name (Option D). This ensures that replication and failover work seamlessly. If the names do not match, the storage containers will not be listed as compatible.

The destination storage container must be empty (Option C). Metro Availability requires a clean storage container at the secondary site to receive data. If the container already contains data, it cannot be used.

Option A is incorrect: Different vendor hardware does not affect Metro Availability compatibility.

Option B is incorrect: Compression does not affect Metro Availability compatibility. However, it is recommended to keep compression settings aligned between sites.

Nutanix Documentation: Metro Availability Deployment Guide

Nutanix Best Practices for Metro Availability

Nutanix KB 2093: Troubleshooting Metro Availability Storage Container Issues

Understanding the Issue

The administrator is investigating VM performance complaints and is analyzing CPU Ready Time data.

CPU Ready Time is a crucial metric in Nutanix and virtualization environments (AHV, ESXi, or Hyper-V).

It measures the amount of time a VM is waiting for CPU scheduling due to resource contention.

High CPU Ready Time indicates that VMs are ready to run but are waiting because the host lacks available CPU resources.

Analysis of the Exhibit

The graph shows CPU Ready Time spikes for multiple VMs.

Some VMs have CPU Ready Time exceeding 18% to 21.5%, which is very high.

A healthy CPU Ready Time should be below 5%.

Values above 10% indicate CPU contention, and anything above 20% is critical and requires immediate troubleshooting.

Evaluating the Answer Choices

(A) Check the number of vCPUs assigned to each CVM. (Incorrect)

CVMs (Controller VMs) have fixed CPU allocation, and modifying their vCPU count is not recommended unless advised by Nutanix Support.

The issue is related to VM CPU contention, not CVM configuration.

(B) Review host CPU utilization. (Correct Answer)

High CPU Ready Time suggests CPU overcommitment or host saturation.

The administrator should check host CPU usage in Prism Central to determine if the cluster is overloaded.

If host CPU usage is consistently above 85--90%, VMs are competing for CPU resources, leading to high CPU Ready Time.

(C) Assess cluster SSD capacity. (Incorrect)

SSD capacity impacts storage performance (latency, read/write speeds) but does not affect CPU Ready Time.

High CPU Ready Time is a CPU scheduling issue, not a storage bottleneck.

(D) Enable VM memory oversubscription. (Incorrect)

Memory oversubscription does not impact CPU scheduling.

Enabling memory oversubscription affects RAM allocation, but CPU Ready Time is strictly related to CPU contention.

Next Steps to Diagnose & Resolve the Issue

Review Host CPU Utilization:

Navigate to Prism Central Analysis CPU Usage per Host.

Identify hosts experiencing high CPU load.

Check VM vCPU Allocation:

Ensure that VMs do not have excessive vCPUs assigned, which can lead to scheduling inefficiencies.

Overprovisioning vCPUs can cause unnecessary contention.

Balance Workload Across Hosts:

Use Nutanix AHV DRS (Dynamic Scheduling) or VMware DRS to redistribute VMs across hosts.

Check if certain hosts are overloaded while others have spare CPU capacity.

Consider Scaling Out the Cluster:

If CPU usage is consistently high, adding more nodes may be required to reduce CPU contention.

Multicloud Infrastructure Reference & Best Practices

CPU Ready Time Best Practices:

Keep CPU Ready Time below 5%.

Avoid overcommitting vCPUs on heavily loaded hosts.

Monitor Prism Central Runway Metrics to predict future CPU resource needs.

Nutanix AHV CPU Scheduling Optimization:

Ensure proper VM sizing (avoid excessive vCPU allocation).

Balance workloads using Nutanix AHV DRS.

Nutanix Prism Central: Performance Analysis and CPU Metrics

Nutanix Bible: VM Performance and Resource Management

Nutanix KB: Troubleshooting High CPU Ready Time in AHV

When using FQDN instead of a Virtual IP in a scale-out Prism Central deployment, Nutanix enables load balancing across multiple Prism Central instances.

Option A (Load balancing) is correct because it ensures that requests are distributed among multiple Prism Central nodes, improving performance and redundancy.

Option B (Resiliency) is incorrect because resiliency is achieved through HA and replication, not through FQDN configuration.

Option C (Segmentation) is incorrect because network segmentation is handled at the VLAN or security policy level.

Option D (SSL Certificate) is incorrect because SSL certificates can be applied regardless of whether FQDN or Virtual IP is used.

Nutanix Prism Central Deployment Guide

Nutanix Best Practices for Scale-Out Prism Central

Nutanix Support KB: Configuring FQDN for Prism Central

In Nutanix Capacity Planning, Overall Runway represents how long the cluster can support current and new workloads before resources are exhausted.

Even if the runway is below 365 days, the system considers the cluster to be in good shape if new workloads are sustainable (Option B).

Option A is incorrect: Storage runway alone is not the only factor; CPU and memory are equally important.

Option C is incorrect: The presence of recommended resources does not mean the cluster is in good shape.

Option D is incorrect: The target of 1 month affects projections but does not explain why the cluster is in good shape.

Nutanix Prism Central Capacity Runway and Planning

Nutanix Bible Workload Placement and Cluster Sizing

Nutanix Support KB Capacity Planning Best Practices

For Nutanix Disaster Recovery (DR) protection policies, the first step is to establish a connection between the Production cluster and the DR site, which is done by creating an Availability Zone (AZ) (Option B).

Availability Zones (AZs) define remote sites for replication and are a requirement for configuring protection domains and disaster recovery plans.

Option A (Installing NGT) is not necessary for setting up replication but is useful for application-consistent snapshots.

Option C (Converting the source cluster to AHV) is not required, as Nutanix supports cross-hypervisor DR between ESXi and AHV.

Option D (Creating a point-in-time snapshot) is a later step after setting up the Availability Zone and Protection Policy.

Nutanix Protection Policies and DR Documentation

Nutanix Bible Disaster Recovery Planning

Nutanix Support KB Configuring Availability Zones in Prism Central

To ensure VM high availability (HA) in the event of a node failure, the administrator must enable HA Reservation (Option B) in Prism Element.

High Availability (HA) in Nutanix ensures that VMs restart on another available node if the host they are running on fails.

Option A (Redundancy Factor 3) affects storage redundancy, not VM failover.

Option C (Protection Domains) is related to disaster recovery (DR), not local HA failover.

Option D (RF1 Storage Container) would reduce fault tolerance and is not recommended for production environments.

Nutanix Prism Element Guide Configuring HA Reservation

Nutanix Bible High Availability (HA) and Failover

Nutanix Support KB VM Recovery with HA Enabled