HRCI PHR Practice Test - Questions Answers

List of questions
Question 1

Which one of the following is the best example of a disparate treatment of discrimination?
All project team members are asked to take turns keeping meeting minutes in a rotation.
The meeting minutes will be kept by both men and women in a rotation.
The meeting minutes will be kept by female members of the project team because they have neater handwriting.
All junior project team members are required to take turns keeping meeting minutes in a rotation.
Requiring only the female members to keep the meeting minutes is a form of disparate treatment.
Answer option A is incorrect. This is a fair, neutral way to ensure that the meeting minutes are kept.
Answer option D is incorrect. While this choice is tempting it's not unlawful as there's no distinction between male and female employees to keep the minutes for the meeting.
Answer option B is incorrect. This is a fair rotation of the meeting minutes, though stating that male and females will rotate on the task could open possibilities of disparate treatment.
Question 2

The Department of Labor establishes the rules for unemployment insurance and associated claims. Who administers the unemployment?
Each organization
The Department of Labor
Insurance companies
Each state
Unemployment insurance claims are managed locally within each state, but federal rules do apply.
Answer option B is incorrect. Unemployment claims are not managed by the department of labor.
Answer option C is incorrect. Insurance companies do provide unemployment insurance, but it's the local state government that manages the claims.
Answer option A is incorrect. Each organization does not manage the unemployment claims.
Question 3

Fred is a union employee who has been summoned by the management to an investigatory hearing regarding his conduct. Fred would like to have a union representative with him at the meeting. What is the name of the right that allows Fred to have a union representative with him at the meeting?
Management Rights
Bumping Right
Right of Way
Weingarten Right
The Weingarten Right is a right based on the US Supreme Court case NLRB v. Weingarten in 1975. This case establishes the right of a union member employee to have a union representative present at investigatory meetings with management.
Answer option B is incorrect. The bumping right is the right of a senior employee whose position may be eliminated, and who opts to take the position of a less senior employee instead of losing the employment altogether.
The less senior employee is 'bump' out of employment by the senior employee.
Answer option C is incorrect. Right of way is not a valid term for this scenario.
Answer option A is incorrect. Management rights describe the ability of management to manage their organization the way they see fit unless the management approach contradicts a union labor contract.
Question 4

There are four components of the HR Impact Model, which affect how a HR Professional may operate within a given environment. Which one of the following is NOT a component of the HR Impact Model?
Consultation
Client
Catalyst
Programs and processes
Client is not one of the four components of the HR Impact Model. The four components are catalyst, consultation, policies and procedures, and programs and processes. Answer options C, A, and D are incorrect. Catalyst, consultation and programs and processes are the components of the HR Impact Model.
Question 5

During the organization of a union, it's possible that the union will gain recognition from the management. The management is then obliged to give the NLRB a list of employees who are eligible to vote in the unionization election. What is the name of the list of such employees called?
Constituent List
Union prospectus List
Excelsior List
Candidate List
The list of employees who are eligible to vote in the union election, is called the Excelsior List. It's so called, based on the outcome of the lawsuit Excelsior Underwear, Inc. v. NLRB in 1996.
Answer option D is incorrect. The list is called the Excelsior List, not the candidate list.
Answer option A is incorrect. The list is called the Excelsior List, not the constituent list.
Answer option B is incorrect. The list is called the Excelsior List, not the union prospectus list.
Question 6

Holly is a senior worker in her organization and she is a member of the union. Her position will be eliminated in sixty days and she will be released from the company. Rather than being unemployed, Holly asks the union to move her to a less senior position and release a junior employee. If the union agrees to this, what will this term be known as?
Bumping
Displacement
Releasing
Re-organization
This is an example of bumping. Bumping is when a senior employee's position is being eliminated and she elects to move to a less senior position and force a less senior worker out of employment.
Answer options C, B, and D are incorrect. These are'nt valid terms for this scenario. Bumping is the correct choice.
Question 7

As an HR Professional, you must be familiar with the collective bargaining agreements and the process that rights are given, contracts, and union and management cooperation. Consider an arbitration process between the management and the union. What term is assigned to the resolution of the disagreement, by an arbitrator's interpretation of the language of the contract?
Resolution
Interpretation
Decision
Outcome
The technical term of arbitration, based on the interpretation of the language of the contract, is called a decision. Answer option D is incorrect. Outcome is not the valid term to describe the interpretation of the language of the contract, which is called a decision.
Answer option A is incorrect. Resolution is not the valid term to describe the interpretation of the language of the contract, which is called a decision.
Answer option B is incorrect. Interpretation is not the valid term to describe the interpretation of the language of the contract, which is called a decision.
Question 8

As an HR Professional you must be familiar with several different lawsuits and their affect on human resource practices today. What legal case found that a test that has an adverse impact on a protected class is still lawful as long as the test can be shown to be valid and job related?
Washington versus Davis, 1976
Griggs versus Duke Power, 1971
McDonnell Douglas Corp. versus Green, 1973
Albemarle Paper versus Moody, 1975
Washington versus Davis is correct. Two African Americans were denied positions at the Washington DC police department because of their performance on a job-related test. The US Supreme Court ruled against the plaintiffs and deemed that the test did not violate the due process clause. Answer option B is incorrect. The Griggs versus Duke Power lawsuit was heard in the US Supreme Court. This case, which preceded the Civil Rights Act of 1964, centered on a policy, Duke Power Company had of segregating employees by race. Answer option C is incorrect. McDonnell Douglas Corp. versus Green, 1973 centered on a race discrimination case regarding the burdens and nature of proof in proving a Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Answer option D is incorrect. Albemarle Paper versus Moody, 1975 dealt with racial discrimination and the responsibilities of organizations to offer back pay to individuals that were racially discriminated. The racial discrimination may have prevented certain employees from advancing in the organization.
Question 9

Your organization has a retirement benefits plan that is covered by ERISA . Under ERISA, which of the following is your organization required to do for the plan participants?
Provide each participant with plan information, specifically about the features and funding of the plan through a summary plan description at a cost of no more than $7 per participant, per year.
Provide each participant with plan information, specifically about the features and funding of the plan through a summary plan description at no cost.
Provide each participant with monthly plan information, specifically about the features and funding of the plan through a summary plan description at no more than $7 per participant, per month.
Provide each participant with monthly plan information, specifically about the features and funding of the plan through a summary plan description at no cost.
The plan administrator is required to provide participants, at no cost, with plan information about the features and funding of the plan.
Answer option A is incorrect. The information must be provided to the participants from the plan administrator at no cost.
Answer option D is incorrect. Monthly information is not mandated so this choice isn't the best answer.
Answer option C is incorrect. Monthly information is not mandated, and the information must be provided at no cost to the plan participants.
Question 10

Fran is a HR Professional for her organization and she is interviewing applicants for a warehouse position. One of the candidates has written on his application that he speaks Spanish. Fran interviews this candidate in Spanish and interviews all other candidates in English. This is an example of what?
Disparate treatment
Disparate impact
Accommodation
Perpetuating past discrimination
Technically this is an example of disparate treatment. Fran has treated this applicant differently than the other applicants because the person says he speaks Spanish.
Answer option D is incorrect. There is no evidence of past discrimination in this example to make this choice correct.
Answer option B is incorrect. The disparate impact happens when a seemingly neutral policy has a disproportionately negative effect on the protected class.
Answer option C is incorrect. Accommodation is not a valid term for this scenario.
Question