The example ACL is used with Aruba CX 6400 switches to permit traffic to web servers configured on interface 1/1/1 inbound with IP 10.254.4.1/24. How does this ACL affect the HTTPS traffic to destination 10.254.4.7 from a client 10.253.1.5 viainterface 1/1/2 with IP 10 254.3.1/24?

The ACL would be valid only if bound to 1/1/2 outbound.

The implicit rule allows the traffic

The implicit rules deny the traffic.

The traffic is allowed when ACL is Pound to inbound traffic.

You have designed a new wired solution for a customer that uses gateways and Dynamic Segmentation Which statements about User-Based Tunneling are true? (Select two)

in UBT, the Aruba Gateway performs user authentication

UBT is supported only with Aruba Gateway standalone

In U8T, the switch performs user authentication.

in UBT, the Aruba Gateway performs user authentication

UBT is supported only with Aruba Gateway standalone

in UBT, the switch sends user role Information to Aruba Gateway

In UBT, the Aruba Gateway assigns the Primary user role

With the given access-list: Which statement is true about hardware resource consumption of this ACL?

The ACL consumes a total of 6 entries.

The ACL consumes a total of 2 entries

The ACL consumes a total of 4 entries.

The ACL consumes a total of 6 entries.

The ACL consumes a total of 8 entries.

What are two valid steps in a Proof of Concept plan? (Select two)

Development of the items to Be tested

Engineering a proposed solution

Acceptance of the proposed solution

With the given topology, the customer Has ArubaOS-CX 6300 switches and Aruba Gateway in use. What is required for the client traffic to be tunneled as per best practice between the connected switch port and the Aruba Gateway'' (Select two.)

The ArubaOS-CX switch and Aruba gateway should have an end-to-end MacSec connection

Change the default MTU on the data-path between the switch and gateway

IP Protocol 6 should not be blocked on me datapath

IP Protocol 47 should not be blocked in the data-path

The ArubaOS-CX switch and Aruba gateway should have an end-to-end MacSec connection

The ArubaOS-CX switch and Aruba gateway should be EBGP peers.

Change the default MTU on the data-path between the switch and gateway

Refer to the exhibit. A customer has implemented this ArubaOS-CX solution. NetEdit is not present. After a while, the secondary node of the VSX-cluster fails. What is the correct procedure to replace the failed node as quickly as possible?

Replace the failed unit, boot up the new node without connecting cables, upgrade firmware and configure as secondary vsx node connect iSl and wart for VSX to synchronize After successful recovery, reconnect the remaining cables.

Replace the failed unit, boot up the new node without connecting cables, upgrade firmware, and restore and save config Shutdown all ports, reconnect the correct cables, and enable all ports

Replace the failed unit, connect the correct cables, boot up the new node in recovery mode, upgrade firmware and restore, and save config Then, reboot and wait for VSX to synchronize.

Replace the failed unit, connect the correct cables, boot up the new node and wait for VSX to synchronize configuration and firmware.

(Scenarios may contain multiple errors which may or may not Impact the solution) Refer to the exhibit. An engineer has attempted to configure two pairs of switches in the referenced configuration, it is required to implement Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation for each pair of switches The ports of the Aruba 8325 switches used for Agg01 and Agg02 are populated as follows:There is an error message staling "incompatible interface." Which interfaces are the cause of the error? (Select two.)

1/1/49 40G QSFP+ 15m Active Optical Cable

1/1/50 40G QSFP+ 15m Active Optical Cable

1/1/12 10GBaseT SFP*+ 30m Cat6A Transceiver

1/1/49 40G QSFP+ 15m Active Optical Cable

1/1/13 10GBaseT SFP+ 30m Cat6A Transceiver

1/1/48 iGBaseT 100m Cat5e Transceiver

1/1/50 40G QSFP+ 15m Active Optical Cable

A customer wants to verify the proposed configuration snippets to create a point-to-point link between Aruba Switch and a third-party switch. Will this configuration work with static routing?

No. the configuration will not work because the Aruba Switch does not have the "routing" command on it

No, the configuration will not work, because the Aruba Switch has an MTU mismatch which will prevent IP communication.

No. the configuration will not work, because the Aruba Switch does not have a locally reachable IP address from the third-party switch.

No. the configuration will not work because the Aruba Switch does not have the "routing" command on it

yes, the configuration should work fine and has no issues

You are working with a customer whos has a paw of Aruba 8325 switches configured for Multi- Chassis Link Aggregation The customer is complaining that users are experiencing intermittent packet drops. Which action should be taken to quickly aid you in identifying the cause?

Check the configured VLANs using "show vsx config-consistency"

Enable debug of vri with "console" set as the destination

Setup a mirror session to generate a Tshark file.

Setup a mirror session to niter packets for TCPDUMP analysis

Check the configured VLANs using "show vsx config-consistency"

How Is voice Traffic prioritized correctly on ArubaOS-CX switches?

By placing it in the strict priority queue

By defining voice VLANs inside VLAN context

By attaching the QoS settings directly to device profiles

The customer is currently planning the migration of their current switches from the existing Aruba 5400R to ArubaOS-CX 6400. Which statements are correct about the mitigation of rogue DHCP servers with the selected product?(Select two )

With Aruba CX 6400 configure dhcp-snooping for the selected VLANs with authorized servers

DHCP snooping can be enabled on ArubaOS-CX switches, once it's disabled on ArubaOS switches for same VLANs

With Aruba CX 6400 configure dhcp-snooping for the selected VLANs with authorized servers

DHCP snooping can be enabled on ArubaOS-CX switches, once it's disabled on ArubaOS switches for same VLANs

DHCP snooping is supported on both IPv4 and IPv6

DHCP snooping needs to be enabled per VRF basis on Aruba CX 6400

A customer is migrating from a Cisco VSS system to an ArubaOS-CX VSX cluster in order to provide default gateway functionality, the local network administrator creates VLAN interfaces The network administrator then migrates successfully from Cisco to Aruba The next day a manager asks if the solution is redundant. The network administrator realizes that there is no redundancy on the default gateway functionality What is the preferred solution with the least amount of configuration and disturbance?

Remove the IP address on every VLAN interface, and replace it with another one in the same subnet Configure VRRP with the default gateway address as virtual IP-address per VLAN.

Remove the IP address on every VLAN interface, and replace it with another one in the same subnet Configure active gateway IP with the default gateway address on every VLAN interface on Doth switches

For every VLAN Interface, configure a VRRP IP address with the same IP address as already present in the first VSX node. Configure this on both switches.

Remove the IP address on every VLAN interface, and replace it with another one in the same subnet Configure VRRP with the default gateway address as virtual IP-address per VLAN.

For every VLAN interface, configure an active gateway IP with the same IP address as already present in the first VSX node Configure this on both switches

Refer to the exhibit. You want to protect the aggregation layer if the VSXISL falls. Where should you place a VSX keepalive link?

On the OOBM ports of both aggregation switches

On a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch

On the OOBM ports of both aggregation switches

Which statements are true with regards to Strict Priority scheduling? (Select two.)

Under strict Priority, the port will never forward a packet in a tower priority queue if a higher priority queue includes even one packet.

Strict Priority must be used with egress queue shaping to prevent starvation.

Strict Priority scheduling protects against starvation of low priority queues.

Under strict Priority, the port will never forward a packet in a tower priority queue if a higher priority queue includes even one packet.

Strict Priority must be used with egress queue shaping to prevent starvation.

Strict Priority works best when the network uses the higher priority queues for the majority of applications

The rate-limiting QoS feature can be implemented on all ArubaOS-CX platforms However, some features are platform dependent. Which statements are true'' (Select two.)

ICMP-Rate limiting is supported on all ArubaOS-CX platforms.

Multicast and broadcast rate limits cannot be applied at the same time on the same Interface

Unknown unicast rate limiting is supported on all ArubaOS-CX platforms

ICMP-Rate limiting is supported on all ArubaOS-CX platforms.

Broadcast-rate limiting is supported on all ArubaOS-CX platforms

Multicast and broadcast rate limits cannot be applied at the same time on the same Interface

ArubaOS-CX 8325 VSX configuration has a Tailed ISL link between the switches with keepalive status established. While troubleshooting the condition, what is the expected behavior of the VSX traffic flow in the current condition?

VSX nodes Keep forwarding traffic over its interfaces

What are the requirements for managing a switch using Aruba NetEdit? (Select two)

REST access-mode must be set to read-write.

Telnet must be disabled on the switch

REST access-mode must be set to read-write.

HTTPS service must be restricted to the management VRF

The switch user account mat NetEdit uses should have a password.

Telnet must be disabled on the switch

The customer is already using Aruba Gateway and third-party L2 switches New ArubaOS CX 6300 switches have been deployed for R&D. which have a requirement for user profiling and tunneled traffic between ArubaOS CX 6300 and Aruba Gateway What is required for this configuration to apply QoS user-based rules for the R&D client traffic?

Apply a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port, lo classify traffic before it is tunneled.

Apply a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch

Manually prioritize IP protocol 47 traffic on the third-party switches to prioritize the tunneled traffic

Create a QoS policy for the UBT-client-VLAN traffic on the third-party switch.

HP HPE6-A69 Practice Test 2 - Free Online Exam Prep & Questions

The example ACL is used with Aruba CX 6400 switches to permit traffic to web servers configured on interface 1/1/1 inbound with IP 10.254.4.1/24.

HP HPE6-A69 image Question 41 14291 09162024180637000000

How does this ACL affect the HTTPS traffic to destination 10.254.4.7 from a client 10.253.1.5 viainterface 1/1/2 with IP 10 254.3.1/24?

Become a Premium Member for full access

Unlock Premium Member

HP HPE6-A69 Practice Test 2

Question

HP HPE6-A69 Practice Tests

Practice Tests