ExamGecko
Question list
Search
Search

List of questions

Search

Related questions











Question 11 - ANS-C01 discussion

Report
Export

A company is using custom DNS servers that run BIND for name resolution in its VPCs. The VPCs are deployed across multiple AWS accounts that are part of the same organization in AWS Organizations.

All the VPCs are connected to a transit gateway. The BIND servers are running in a central VPC and are configured to forward all queries for an on-premises DNS domain to DNS servers that are hosted in an on-premises data center. To ensure that all the VPCs use the custom DNS servers, a network engineer has configured a VPC DHCP options set in all the VPCs that specifies the custom DNS servers to be used as domain name servers.

Multiple development teams in the company want to use Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS).

A development team has created a new EFS file system but cannot mount the file system to one of its Amazon EC2 instances. The network engineer discovers that the EC2 instance cannot resolve the IP address for the EFS mount point fs-33444567d.efs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com. The network engineer needs to implement a solution so that development teams throughout the organization can mount EFS file systems.

Which combination of steps will meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

A.
Configure the BIND DNS servers in the central VPC to forward queries for efs.us-east- 1.amazonaws.com to the Amazon provided DNS server (169.254.169.253).
Answers
A.
Configure the BIND DNS servers in the central VPC to forward queries for efs.us-east- 1.amazonaws.com to the Amazon provided DNS server (169.254.169.253).
B.
Create an Amazon Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint in the central VPC. Update all the VPC DHCP options sets to use AmazonProvidedDNS for name resolution.
Answers
B.
Create an Amazon Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint in the central VPC. Update all the VPC DHCP options sets to use AmazonProvidedDNS for name resolution.
C.
Create an Amazon Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint in the central VPUpdate all the VPC DHCP options sets to use the Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint in the central VPC for name resolution.
Answers
C.
Create an Amazon Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint in the central VPUpdate all the VPC DHCP options sets to use the Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint in the central VPC for name resolution.
D.
Create an Amazon Route 53 Resolver rule to forward queries for the on-premises domain to the on-premises DNS servers. Share the rule with the organization by using AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM). Associate the rule with all the VPCs.
Answers
D.
Create an Amazon Route 53 Resolver rule to forward queries for the on-premises domain to the on-premises DNS servers. Share the rule with the organization by using AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM). Associate the rule with all the VPCs.
E.
Create an Amazon Route 53 private hosted zone for the efs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com domain.Associate the private hosted zone with the VPC where the EC2 instance is deployed. Create an A record for fs-33444567d.efs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com in the private hosted zone. Configure the A record to return the mount target of the EFS mount point.
Answers
E.
Create an Amazon Route 53 private hosted zone for the efs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com domain.Associate the private hosted zone with the VPC where the EC2 instance is deployed. Create an A record for fs-33444567d.efs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com in the private hosted zone. Configure the A record to return the mount target of the EFS mount point.
Suggested answer: B, D

Explanation:

Option B suggests using Amazon Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint, which would replace the existing BIND DNS servers with the AmazonProvidedDNS for name resolution. However, the scenario specifically mentions that the company is using custom DNS servers that run BIND for name resolution in its VPCs, so this solution would not work. Option D suggests creating a Route 53 Resolver rule to forward queries for the on-premises domain to the on-premises DNS servers, which would not address the issue of resolving the EFS mount point. The problem is not with resolving queries for the on-premises domain, but rather with resolving the IP address for the EFS mount point.

asked 16/09/2024
JAOID EL OUALITI
29 questions
User
Your answer:
0 comments
Sorted by

Leave a comment first