300-510: Implementing Cisco Service Provider Advanced Routing Solutions (SPRI)
Cisco
The Cisco 300-510 SPRI exam is essential for professionals focusing on advanced routing technologies and services. Our comprehensive resource for 300-510 practice tests, shared by those who have successfully passed the exam, provides realistic scenarios and valuable insights to boost your exam preparation.
Why Use 300-510 Practice Test?
-
Real Exam Experience: Our practice test accurately replicates the format and difficulty of the actual Cisco 300-510 exam, providing you with a realistic preparation experience.
-
Identify Knowledge Gaps: Practicing with these tests helps you identify areas where you need more study, allowing you to focus your efforts effectively.
-
Boost Confidence: Regular practice with exam-like questions builds your confidence and reduces test anxiety.
-
Track Your Progress: Monitor your performance over time to see your improvement and adjust your study plan accordingly.
Key Features of 300-510 Practice Test:
-
Up-to-Date Content: Our community ensures that the questions are regularly updated to reflect the latest exam objectives and technology trends.
-
Detailed Explanations: Each question comes with detailed explanations, helping you understand the correct answers and learn from any mistakes.
-
Comprehensive Coverage: The practice test covers all key topics of the Cisco 300-510 exam, including routing protocols, policy language, MPLS, and segment routing.
-
Customizable Practice: Create your own practice sessions based on specific topics or difficulty levels to tailor your study experience to your needs.
Exam number: 300-510
Exam name: Implementing Cisco Service Provider Advanced Routing Solutions (SPRI 300-510)
Length of test: 90 minutes
Exam format: Multiple-choice, drag-and-drop, fill-in-the-blank, testlet, simlet, and simulation questions
Exam language: English
Number of questions in the actual exam: 55-65 questions
Passing score: Varies, typically around 750-850 out of 1000
Use the member-shared Cisco 300-510 Practice Test to ensure you’re fully prepared for your certification exam. Start practicing today and take a significant step towards achieving your certification goals!
Related questions
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit. Users connected to an application on 1.1.1.1 via routers CE1 and CE2 are complaining of frequent disconnections. While troubleshooting the issue, a network engineer with an employee ID: 4333:96:916 determined that the application itself is working normally, but the link connected to the 1.1.1.1 application is flapping. The users on CE1 and CE2 are accessing applications on 2.2.2.2 without difficulty. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to me exhibit.
A network engineer sets up a multihoming eBGP topology where multiple Autonomous Systems connect to ASN 64501. The engineer wants to block all the routers coming from ASN 64502. but allow all the others. For that purpose, the following AS Pam prefix 1st s being used:
What must be fixed to achieve this result?
The AS-PATH filter must be defined inside the route-map mode
At the end ip as-path access-list 10 permit .* must be included
The statement must be modified with ip as-path access-list 1 deny _64502_
The statement must CM modified with ip as path access list 1 deny A64502$
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit.
An engineer has successfully fixed BGP peering issue. R1 has an established eBGP peering with R2 and R3. Which mechanism should the engineer apply in order to steer the traffic correctly?
The MED attribute can be applied on R2 to influence R1 to use it as the primary path.
The local preference attribute can be applied on R3 to influence AS 65513 to use AS 65515 as the secondary path.
The weight attribute can be applied on R2 to influence AS 65513 to use AS 65515 as the primary path.
The IGP metric can be manipulated on R1 to allow traffic to be load balanced between R2 and R3.
Explanation:
Some level of load balancing is achieved by default as BGP prefers shortest AS_PATH for certain prefix (Cisco BGP path selection algorithm - rule 4) . If 1-7 rules gives no preference for certain prefix then with rule 8. Prefer lowest IGP metric to BGP next hop we can force traffic to R2 or R3 influencing load distribution.
Guidelines
This is a lab item in which tasks will be performed on virtual devices.
Refer to the Tasks tab to view the tasks for this lab item.
Refer to the Topology tab to access the device console(s) and perform the tasks.
Console access is available for all required devices by clicking the device icon or using the tab(s) above the console window.
All necessary preconfigurations have been applied.
Do not change the enable password or hostname for any device.
Save your configurations to NVRAM before moving to the next item.
Click Next at the bottom of the screen to submit this lab and move to the next question.
When Next is clicked, the lab doses and cannot be reopened.
Topology
Tasks
Configure and verify an OSPF neighbor adjacency between R1 and R2 in OSPF area 0 according to the topology to achieve these goals:
1. R1 pings the Loopback0 interface of R2. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task.
2. R2 pings the Loopback0 interface of R1. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task.
3. R2 receives a single summary route 172.16.100.0/22 for networks 172.16.100.0/24, 172.16.101.0/24, and 172.16.103.0/24.
Refer to the exhibit.
Routers within the cluster are not receiving the desired prefixes. What must be done to fix the issue?
Clients in that cluster must have full mesh connectivity between eBGP peers.
No client-to-client must be disabled.
Clients in that cluster must have full mesh connectivity between iBGP peers.
No client-to-client reflection must be enabled.
Refer to the exhibit.
The green policy is designed with low delay, and the pink policy is designed with low cost. What is the next hop for node A on its way to node D, with the objective of achieving a low delay?
192.168.3.2
192.168.1.6
192.168.3.6
192. 168.1.2
Refer to the exhibit.
Routers R1, R2. R3, and R4 have been configured to run OSPF. and router R5 is running EIGRP Traffic from R1 to R5 is expected to pass via R4. but OSPF routing has calculated the best path via R3. Which action corrects the problem?
Configure R3 to use metric-type 1 with a higher metric than R4.
Configure R1 with a static route to the R5 networks and set R5 as the next hop.
Reconfigure R1 in Area 0.
Change the metric-type value on R3 to 2.
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit. Company A established BGP sessions with several ISPs. A network engineer at the company must filter out all traffic except for routes that transit AS 152. The engineer configured the filtering policy “permit _152S_(_
[0.9])” on R1, but after applying the configuration, the engineer notices that other routes are still visible. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit A network engineer installed a new router (router 3) at the regional hub running MPLS services for scalability Router 3 is connected to the 10.44 4.0,'24. 10.44 5.024. 10 44.6.0/24. and 10 44 7 0/24 subnets The new router has been configured for OSPF area 2. and it is advertising the four connected networks. The engineer noticed that the same networks are listed as interarea summary routes, and they are being flooded into each area on the area borders Which action resolves the issue?
On router 3, configure an access list to filter the networks.
On router 2, configure a route map to filter the networks.
Under the OSPF configuration on router 3. add area 2 range 10.44.4.0 255.255.252.0.
Under the OSPF configuration on router 2, add area 2 range 10.44.4.0 255.255.252.0.
Question