ExamGecko
Login
Home / Cisco / 300-510 / List of questions
Ask Question

Cisco 300-510 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 9

Add to Whishlist

List of questions

Question 81

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 81 112792 10072024005946000000

All routers on this network have been configured with P1M-SM and R1 is the rendezvous point However, when asymmetric routing is implemented to modify link usage the network begins to drop certain multicast traffic Which action corrects the problem?

Place the routes affected by asymmetric routing in a VRF.

Place the routes affected by asymmetric routing in a VRF.

Remove the asymmetric routing and use spanning tree to manage link usage.

Remove the asymmetric routing and use spanning tree to manage link usage.

Add a static Mroute for routes that are failing.

Add a static Mroute for routes that are failing.

Configure the routers to use PIM-DM instead of PIM-SM.

Configure the routers to use PIM-DM instead of PIM-SM.

Suggested answer: A
asked 07/10/2024
Tim Klein
41 questions

Question 82

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 82 112793 10072024005946000000

An engineer applied the configuration on R1 to prevent network 192.168.1.0/24 from being propagated outside of area 5. After the change, users have reported they are not able to access any of the application servers that were working before. While checking the routing table of the peer router. The engineer notices R1 stopped propagating any routes outside are 5. Which action must be taken to fix the problem?

Configure an additional filter-list on R1 for inbound traffic to allow external router into area 5.

Configure an additional filter-list on R1 for inbound traffic to allow external router into area 5.

Reconfigure the filter-list statement to apply in the inbound direction

Reconfigure the filter-list statement to apply in the inbound direction

Change the prefix-list action to permit and add an explicit deny statement for network 192.168.1.0/24

Change the prefix-list action to permit and add an explicit deny statement for network 192.168.1.0/24

Add a permit statement for 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 to the end of the prefix-list 10 override the implicit deny.

Add a permit statement for 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 to the end of the prefix-list 10 override the implicit deny.

Suggested answer: D
Explanation:

Cisco 300-510 image Question 82 explanation 112793 10072024005946000000

asked 07/10/2024
Mahmoud Ismail
40 questions

Question 83

Report Export Collapse

What is the role of segment routing mapping server?

It advertises a local SID mapping policy to all the mapping clients.

It advertises a local SID mapping policy to all the mapping clients.

It works with IGP instances to calculate the prefix-SIDs in the absence of a mapping policy.

It works with IGP instances to calculate the prefix-SIDs in the absence of a mapping policy.

It selects multiple mapping entries to create overlapping active mapping policies.

It selects multiple mapping entries to create overlapping active mapping policies.

It reads and translates remotely received SIDs from other mapping servers to create SID mapping entries.

It reads and translates remotely received SIDs from other mapping servers to create SID mapping entries.

Suggested answer: A
asked 07/10/2024
Osman Rana
37 questions

Question 84

Report Export Collapse

Which difference should be considered when intradomain or interdomain multicast routing is implemented?

Interdomain multicast routing requires an IS-IS or OSPF neighbor relationship between the domains but intradomain multicast routing requires only BGP

Interdomain multicast routing requires an IS-IS or OSPF neighbor relationship between the domains but intradomain multicast routing requires only BGP

Interdomain multicast routing relies on PIM-DM and intradomain multicast routing relies on PIMSM.

Interdomain multicast routing relies on PIM-DM and intradomain multicast routing relies on PIMSM.

interdomain multicast routing uses BIDR-PIM to establish neighbor relationships between AS and interdomain multicast routing uses MSDP

interdomain multicast routing uses BIDR-PIM to establish neighbor relationships between AS and interdomain multicast routing uses MSDP

A network uses intradomain multicast routing without interdomain routing but networks that use interdomain multicast routing must also apply intradomain routing

A network uses intradomain multicast routing without interdomain routing but networks that use interdomain multicast routing must also apply intradomain routing

Suggested answer: D
asked 07/10/2024
Derrick Roberson
39 questions

Question 85

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 85 112796 10072024005946000000

Routers RA and RB are IS-IS peers configured for NSF but router RC is an IS-IS peer without NSF capability If RA undergoes processor switchover what is the effect on the network environment?

If RC is operating without the Cisco configuration option all three routers tear down their peering relationships and re-establish peering

If RC is operating without the Cisco configuration option all three routers tear down their peering relationships and re-establish peering

All peer relationships remain up and the link-state database is unchanged

All peer relationships remain up and the link-state database is unchanged

All peer relationships remain up, but the link-state database is rebuilt on each device

All peer relationships remain up, but the link-state database is rebuilt on each device

If RC is operating without the Cisco configuration option only 2 routers tear down their peering relationships and re-establish peering

If RC is operating without the Cisco configuration option only 2 routers tear down their peering relationships and re-establish peering

Suggested answer: C
asked 07/10/2024
Fatawu Musah
38 questions

Question 86

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 86 112797 10072024005946000000

An engineer applied the summarization configuration on R1 for four networks (192.168.20.0/24 to 192.168.23.0/24) in area 1 and eight networks (192.168.32.0/24 to 192.168.39.0/24) in area 2 to stop the flooding of all the customer routes.

While checking the routing table of R2, the engineer noticed that R1 is still sending only specific routes to R2. Which configuration should the engineer apply on R1 to summarize routes?

Cisco 300-510 image Question 86 112797 10072024005946000000

Option A

Option A

Option B

Option B

Option C

Option C

Option D

Option D

Suggested answer: C
asked 07/10/2024
Hemanth Gangabattula
40 questions

Question 87

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 87 112798 10072024005946000000

Traffic flow from router R1 to router R6 is delay-sensitive It must consider potential link-failure and node-failure conditions Which configuration must an engineer apply to router R1 to route traffic to router R6 if router R2 fails?

Cisco 300-510 image Question 87 112798 10072024005946000000

Option A

Option A

Option B

Option B

Option C

Option C

Option D

Option D

Suggested answer: B
asked 07/10/2024
Nicklas Magnusson
46 questions

Question 88

Report Export Collapse

An engineer is troubleshooting slow performance issues on a customer’s network after the last multicast configuration change was applied on it While checking the running configuration on the router the engineer notices there are many ip igmp join-group commands applied on several interfaces of the router which caused the high CPU utilization usage. What action must the engineer take to solve this issue?

Configure ip igmp static-group command on all interfaces

Configure ip igmp static-group command on all interfaces

Remove ip igmp join-group command on all unnecessary interfaces

Remove ip igmp join-group command on all unnecessary interfaces

Configure all router interfaces to be process-switched by increasing the query interval

Configure all router interfaces to be process-switched by increasing the query interval

Remove unnecessary members from the IGMP group

Remove unnecessary members from the IGMP group

Suggested answer: B
asked 07/10/2024
Nika Longley
45 questions

Question 89

Report Export Collapse

Refer to me exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 89 112800 10072024005946000000

A network engineer sets up a multihoming eBGP topology where multiple Autonomous Systems connect to ASN 64501. The engineer wants to block all the routers coming from ASN 64502. but allow all the others. For that purpose, the following AS Pam prefix 1st s being used:

Cisco 300-510 image Question 89 112800 10072024005946000000

What must be fixed to achieve this result?

The AS-PATH filter must be defined inside the route-map mode

The AS-PATH filter must be defined inside the route-map mode

At the end ip as-path access-list 10 permit .* must be included

At the end ip as-path access-list 10 permit .* must be included

The statement must be modified with ip as-path access-list 1 deny _64502_

The statement must be modified with ip as-path access-list 1 deny _64502_

The statement must CM modified with ip as path access list 1 deny A64502$

The statement must CM modified with ip as path access list 1 deny A64502$

Suggested answer: B
asked 07/10/2024
Joseph Daly
48 questions

Question 90

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 90 112801 10072024005946000000

A network engineer applied configuration on R1 to summarize all ISIS routes, but R2 Is still receiving specific routes from R1. The engineer has confirmed that both routers are configured with the correct summarization configuration, but R1 is not sending the correct summary routes. Which configuration must be applied to router R1 to summarize routes within Level 1?

Cisco 300-510 image Question 90 112801 10072024005946000000

Option A

Option A

Option B

Option B

Option C

Option C

Option D

Option D

Suggested answer: C
asked 07/10/2024
Laimonas Mulys
49 questions
Total 214 questions
Go to page: of 22
Search
Open VPLUS File
Convert VPLUS to PDF

Related questions

Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit. Users connected to an application on 1.1.1.1 via routers CE1 and CE2 are complaining of frequent disconnections. While troubleshooting the issue, a network engineer with an employee ID: 4333:96:916 determined that the application itself is working normally, but the link connected to the 1.1.1.1 application is flapping. The users on CE1 and CE2 are accessing applications on 2.2.2.2 without difficulty. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to me exhibit. A network engineer sets up a multihoming eBGP topology where multiple Autonomous Systems connect to ASN 64501. The engineer wants to block all the routers coming from ASN 64502. but allow all the others. For that purpose, the following AS Pam prefix 1st s being used: What must be fixed to achieve this result?
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer has successfully fixed BGP peering issue. R1 has an established eBGP peering with R2 and R3. Which mechanism should the engineer apply in order to steer the traffic correctly?
Guidelines This is a lab item in which tasks will be performed on virtual devices. Refer to the Tasks tab to view the tasks for this lab item. Refer to the Topology tab to access the device console(s) and perform the tasks. Console access is available for all required devices by clicking the device icon or using the tab(s) above the console window. All necessary preconfigurations have been applied. Do not change the enable password or hostname for any device. Save your configurations to NVRAM before moving to the next item. Click Next at the bottom of the screen to submit this lab and move to the next question. When Next is clicked, the lab doses and cannot be reopened. Topology Tasks Configure and verify an OSPF neighbor adjacency between R1 and R2 in OSPF area 0 according to the topology to achieve these goals: 1. R1 pings the Loopback0 interface of R2. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task. 2. R2 pings the Loopback0 interface of R1. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task. 3. R2 receives a single summary route 172.16.100.0/22 for networks 172.16.100.0/24, 172.16.101.0/24, and 172.16.103.0/24.
Refer to the exhibit. Routers within the cluster are not receiving the desired prefixes. What must be done to fix the issue?
Refer to the exhibit. The green policy is designed with low delay, and the pink policy is designed with low cost. What is the next hop for node A on its way to node D, with the objective of achieving a low delay?
Refer to the exhibit. Routers R1, R2. R3, and R4 have been configured to run OSPF. and router R5 is running EIGRP Traffic from R1 to R5 is expected to pass via R4. but OSPF routing has calculated the best path via R3. Which action corrects the problem?
Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit. Company A established BGP sessions with several ISPs. A network engineer at the company must filter out all traffic except for routes that transit AS 152. The engineer configured the filtering policy “permit _152S_(_ [0.9])” on R1, but after applying the configuration, the engineer notices that other routes are still visible. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit A network engineer installed a new router (router 3) at the regional hub running MPLS services for scalability Router 3 is connected to the 10.44 4.0,'24. 10.44 5.024. 10 44.6.0/24. and 10 44 7 0/24 subnets The new router has been configured for OSPF area 2. and it is advertising the four connected networks. The engineer noticed that the same networks are listed as interarea summary routes, and they are being flooded into each area on the area borders Which action resolves the issue?