Cisco 300-510 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 6
Question list
Related questions
Refer to the exhibit.
A network engineer implemented this segment routing configuration. Which statement about the output is true?
This range conflicts with the segment routing local block range.
The device must be reloaded for these ranges to be allocated and used.
The default segment routing global block range is being used on this device.
A nondefault segment routing global block range is being used on this device.
Refer to the exhibit.
CE1 is the gateway router into the provider network via PE1. A network operator must inject a default route into OSPF area 0. All devices inside area 0 must be able to reach PE1. Which configuration achieves this goal?
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Which two characteristics unique to SSM when compared to ASM are true? (Choose two.)
It uses SPT switchover
It uses (*,G) exclusively
It uses IGMPv3
It uses RP
It uses (S,G) exclusively
Refer to the exhibit.
P1 and PE3 Cisco IOS XR routers are directly connected and have this configuration applied. The BGP session is not coming up. Assume that there is no IP reachability problem and both routers can open tcp port 179 to each other. Which action fixes the issue?
Change HMAC-MD5 to HMAC-SHA1-20
Configure the send and accept lifetime under key 1
Change HMAC-MD5 to MD5
Change HMAC-MD5 to HMAC-SHA1-12
Refer to the exhibit.
An engineer has successfully fixed BGP peering issue. R1 has an established eBGP peering with R2 and R3. Which mechanism should the engineer apply in order to steer the traffic correctly?
The MED attribute can be applied on R2 to influence R1 to use it as the primary path.
The local preference attribute can be applied on R3 to influence AS 65513 to use AS 65515 as the secondary path.
The weight attribute can be applied on R2 to influence AS 65513 to use AS 65515 as the primary path.
The IGP metric can be manipulated on R1 to allow traffic to be load balanced between R2 and R3.
Refer to the exhibit.
Which attribute can router 1 alter so that only other iBGP peers prefer to use 192.168.4.2 as the next hop for route 192.168.3.0/24?
MED
local preference
origin
weight
Refer to the exhibit.
A network operator must stop 10.33.33.33/32 from being redistributed into Level 1 router XR1. Which configuration meets this need?
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Refer to the exhibits.
All links inside the network are configured at a default cost of one inside the fully converged OSPF domain. Given the configuration from XR1, which interface does traffic from XR1 that is destined to the loopback interface of XR6 select for the exiting interface?
Interface GigabitElhemet 0/0. The tie breaker of the node index priority is lower and trumps the path cost.
Interface GigabitEthernet 0/1. The tie breaker of the path cost being lower. The node index priority does not impact this selection process.
Interface GigabitEthernet 0/1. The tie breaker of the node index priority is lower and trumps the path cost.
Interface GigabitEthernet 0/0. The tier breaker of the path cost being lower. The node index priority does not impact this selection process.
After an engineer configures BGP in R1, it starts receiving this message *Jun 29 13:30:50.122: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 192.168.10.1 Down User reset Jun 29 13:30:52.341: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 192.168.10.1 2/6 (unacceptable hold time) 0 bytes Which action makes the peering come back up again?
Make a soft reset to the peer.
Set up a minimum hold-down timer higher.
Set up a hello timer higher.
Set up a hold-down timer higher.
Refer to the exhibits.
A network operator is troubleshooting packet loss seen from the R1 loopback interface to the R2 loopback interface over the core network. The operator is attempting to identify the next leg in the path from PE1. Which interface and label path should the operator investigate next?
PE1 – Gi0/0/0/3 - forwarding label 24002
PE1 – Gi0/0/0/2 - forwarding label 24002
PE1 – Gi0/0/0/3 - forwarding label 24001
PE1 - Gi0/0/0/2 - forwarding label 24001
Question