ExamGecko
Login
Home / Cisco / 300-510 / List of questions
Ask Question

Cisco 300-510 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 5

Add to Whishlist

List of questions

Question 41

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 41 112752 10072024005946000000

Routers R1 and R2 cannot form a neighbor relationship, but the network is otherwise configured correctly and operating normally. Which two statements describe the problem? (Choose two.)

The two routers are in the same area

The two routers are in the same area

The two routers are in different subnets

The two routers are in different subnets

The two routers have password mismatch issues

The two routers have password mismatch issues

The two routers have the same network ID

The two routers have the same network ID

The two routers are in different areas

The two routers are in different areas

Suggested answer: B, E
asked 07/10/2024
Areeluck Parnsoonthorn
42 questions

Question 42

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 42 112753 10072024005946000000

P1 and PE3 Cisco IOS XR routers are directly connected and have this configuration applied. The BGP session is not coming up. Assume that there is no IP reachability problem and both routers can open tcp port 179 to each other. Which two actions fix the issue? (Choose two.)

Change MD5 to HMAC-SHA1-12

Change MD5 to HMAC-SHA1-12

Change MD5 to HMAC-ESP

Change MD5 to HMAC-ESP

Change MD5 to SHA-1

Change MD5 to SHA-1

Change MD5 to HMAC-MD5

Change MD5 to HMAC-MD5

Remove the send and accept lifetime under key 1

Remove the send and accept lifetime under key 1

Suggested answer: A, D
Explanation:

Reference: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r4-0/security/configuration/guide/sc40crsbook_chapter5.html

asked 07/10/2024
Freddy Rojas
42 questions

Question 43

Report Export Collapse

Which command is used to enable BIDIR-PIM under global configuration mode for Cisco IOS XE Sofware?

ip pim bidir-enable

ip pim bidir-enable

ipv4 pim bidir-enable

ipv4 pim bidir-enable

ip multicast-routing

ip multicast-routing

ip pim bidir

ip pim bidir

Suggested answer: A
Explanation:

Reference: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipmulti_pim/configuration/xe-3s/imc-pim-xe-3sbook/imc_basic_cfg.html

asked 07/10/2024
Coleman Owie
45 questions

Question 44

Report Export Collapse

Which output from the show isis interface command helps an engineer troubleshoot an IS-IS adjacency problem on a Cisco IOS-XR platform?

metric

metric

priority

priority

circuit type

circuit type

hello interval

hello interval

Suggested answer: C
Explanation:

RP/0/0/CPU0:XR1#show isis interface | i Cir

Tue Jun 29 17:56:42.369 UTC

Circuit Type: level-1-2

Circuit Number: 0

Circuit Type: level-1

Circuit Number: 1

RP/0/0/CPU0:XR1#show isis interface | i Hel

Tue Jun 29 17:56:46.609 UTC

asked 07/10/2024
Venkata Shiva Rajesh Boyinapalli
49 questions

Question 45

Report Export Collapse

A network engineer is troubleshooting OSPF multiare

Which Cisco IOS XR feature should the engineer use in order to streamline OSPF issue?

Which Cisco IOS XR feature should the engineer use in order to streamline OSPF issue?

hierarchical CLI

hierarchical CLI

DR support for topology management

DR support for topology management

routing process enabled by default on all interfaces

routing process enabled by default on all interfaces

show ip ospf topology command

show ip ospf topology command

Suggested answer: A
Explanation:

OSPF Hierarchical CLI and CLI Inheritance

Hierarchical CLI is the grouping of related network component information at defined hierarchical levels such as at the router, area, and interface levels. Hierarchical CLI allows for easier configuration, maintenance, and troubleshooting of

OSPF configurations. When configuration commands are displayed together in their hierarchical context, visual inspections are simplified. Hierarchical CLI is intrinsic for CLI inheritance to be supported.

With CLI inheritance support, you need not explicitly configure a parameter for an area or interface.

In the software, the parameters of interfaces in the same area can be exclusively configured with a single command, or parameter values can be inherited from a higher hierarchical level—such as from the area configuration level or the router ospf configuration levels.

More information: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/iosxr/ncs5500/routing/71x/b-routingcg-ncs5500-71x/b-routing-cg-ncs5500-71x_chapter_011.html#con_1059437

Reference: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/xr12000/software/xr12k_r4-0/routing/configuration/guide/rc40xr12k_chapter4.html#con_1059437

asked 07/10/2024
Sam Krupesh
44 questions

Question 46

Report Export Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco 300-510 image Question 46 112757 10072024005946000000

After troubleshooting BGP traffic steering issue, which action did the network operator take to achieve the correct effect of this configuration?

Routes that have passed through AS 65517 have the local preference set to 150.

Routes that have passed through AS 65517 have the local preference set to 150.

Routes that have originated through AS 65517 have the local preference set to 150.

Routes that have originated through AS 65517 have the local preference set to 150.

Routes directly attached to AS 65517 have the local preference set to 150.

Routes directly attached to AS 65517 have the local preference set to 150.

Routes that have passed through AS 65517 have the local preference set to 150 and the traffic is denied.

Routes that have passed through AS 65517 have the local preference set to 150 and the traffic is denied.

Suggested answer: A
asked 07/10/2024
Florence Li
47 questions

Question 47

Report Export Collapse

For which reason can two BGP peers fail to establish a neighbor relationship?

Their BGP send-community strings are misconfigured

Their BGP send-community strings are misconfigured

Their BGP timers are mismatched

Their BGP timers are mismatched

Their remote-as numbers are misconfigured

Their remote-as numbers are misconfigured

They are both activated under an IPv4 address family

They are both activated under an IPv4 address family

Suggested answer: C
asked 07/10/2024
Charles Manser
53 questions

Question 48

Report Export Collapse

In a PIM-SM environment, which mechanism determines the traffic that a receiver receives?

The receiver explicitly requests its desired traffic from the RP on the shared tree.

The receiver explicitly requests its desired traffic from the RP on the shared tree.

The receiver explicitly requests traffic from a single source, which responds by forwarding all traffic.

The receiver explicitly requests traffic from a single source, which responds by forwarding all traffic.

The RP on the shared tree floods traffic out of all PIM configured interfaces.

The RP on the shared tree floods traffic out of all PIM configured interfaces.

The receiver explicitly requests traffic from each desired source, which responds by sending all traffic.

The receiver explicitly requests traffic from each desired source, which responds by sending all traffic.

Suggested answer: A
Explanation:

A shared tree is built first between receiver and the RP. The receiver is then able to switch to a Source tree as needed.

asked 07/10/2024
Felix Bourdier
51 questions

Question 49

Report Export Collapse

Which statement about BFD on Cisco IOS XR Software is true?

Cisco IOS XR router must use LDP to route back to the Cisco IOS router to establish the peer relationship.

Cisco IOS XR router must use LDP to route back to the Cisco IOS router to establish the peer relationship.

Cisco IOS XR Software does not support BFD multihop for IPv4.

Cisco IOS XR Software does not support BFD multihop for IPv4.

Cisco IOS XR router must use dynamic routing or a static route back to the Cisco IOS router to establish the peer relationship.

Cisco IOS XR router must use dynamic routing or a static route back to the Cisco IOS router to establish the peer relationship.

BFD is not compatible between Cisco IOS XR and Cisco IOS Software.

BFD is not compatible between Cisco IOS XR and Cisco IOS Software.

Suggested answer: C
Explanation:

A router running BFD in Cisco IOS software can designate a router running BFD in Cisco IOS XR software as its peer using the bfd neighbor command; the Cisco IOS XR router must use dynamic routing or a static route back to the Cisco IOS router to establish the peer relationship.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r6-1/routing/configuration/guide/b-routing-cg-crs-61x/b-routing-cg-crs-61x_chapter_0100.html

Reference: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k-r6-3/routing/configuration/guide/b-routing-cg-asr9000-63x/b-routing-cg-asr9000-63x_chapter_0100.html

asked 07/10/2024
Daniel Ramos
40 questions

Question 50

Report Export Collapse

Which two routing protocols have extensions capable of running SRv6? (Choose two.)

OSPF

OSPF

BGP

BGP

RIP

RIP

IGRP

IGRP

EIGRP

EIGRP

Suggested answer: A, B
asked 07/10/2024
Saksith Tangthong
41 questions
Total 214 questions
Go to page: of 22
Open VPLUS File
Convert VPLUS to PDF

Related questions

Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit. Users connected to an application on 1.1.1.1 via routers CE1 and CE2 are complaining of frequent disconnections. While troubleshooting the issue, a network engineer with an employee ID: 4333:96:916 determined that the application itself is working normally, but the link connected to the 1.1.1.1 application is flapping. The users on CE1 and CE2 are accessing applications on 2.2.2.2 without difficulty. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to me exhibit. A network engineer sets up a multihoming eBGP topology where multiple Autonomous Systems connect to ASN 64501. The engineer wants to block all the routers coming from ASN 64502. but allow all the others. For that purpose, the following AS Pam prefix 1st s being used: What must be fixed to achieve this result?
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer has successfully fixed BGP peering issue. R1 has an established eBGP peering with R2 and R3. Which mechanism should the engineer apply in order to steer the traffic correctly?
Guidelines This is a lab item in which tasks will be performed on virtual devices. Refer to the Tasks tab to view the tasks for this lab item. Refer to the Topology tab to access the device console(s) and perform the tasks. Console access is available for all required devices by clicking the device icon or using the tab(s) above the console window. All necessary preconfigurations have been applied. Do not change the enable password or hostname for any device. Save your configurations to NVRAM before moving to the next item. Click Next at the bottom of the screen to submit this lab and move to the next question. When Next is clicked, the lab doses and cannot be reopened. Topology Tasks Configure and verify an OSPF neighbor adjacency between R1 and R2 in OSPF area 0 according to the topology to achieve these goals: 1. R1 pings the Loopback0 interface of R2. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task. 2. R2 pings the Loopback0 interface of R1. Use interface-level configuration to complete this task. 3. R2 receives a single summary route 172.16.100.0/22 for networks 172.16.100.0/24, 172.16.101.0/24, and 172.16.103.0/24.
Refer to the exhibit. Routers within the cluster are not receiving the desired prefixes. What must be done to fix the issue?
Refer to the exhibit. The green policy is designed with low delay, and the pink policy is designed with low cost. What is the next hop for node A on its way to node D, with the objective of achieving a low delay?
Refer to the exhibit. Routers R1, R2. R3, and R4 have been configured to run OSPF. and router R5 is running EIGRP Traffic from R1 to R5 is expected to pass via R4. but OSPF routing has calculated the best path via R3. Which action corrects the problem?
Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit. Company A established BGP sessions with several ISPs. A network engineer at the company must filter out all traffic except for routes that transit AS 152. The engineer configured the filtering policy “permit _152S_(_ [0.9])” on R1, but after applying the configuration, the engineer notices that other routes are still visible. Which action resolves the issue?
Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit A network engineer installed a new router (router 3) at the regional hub running MPLS services for scalability Router 3 is connected to the 10.44 4.0,'24. 10.44 5.024. 10 44.6.0/24. and 10 44 7 0/24 subnets The new router has been configured for OSPF area 2. and it is advertising the four connected networks. The engineer noticed that the same networks are listed as interarea summary routes, and they are being flooded into each area on the area borders Which action resolves the issue?