Isaca CISM Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 16

Documenting the chain of custody is the PRIMARY step for an organizational response to a security incident if civil litigation is a goal because it ensures the integrity, authenticity, and admissibility of the evidence collected from the incident. The chain of custody is the process of documenting the history of the evidence, including its identification, collection, preservation, transportation, analysis, storage, and presentation in court. The chain of custody should include information such as the date, time, location, description, source, owner, handler, and purpose of each evidence item, as well as any changes, modifications, or transfers that occurred to the evidence.Documenting the chain of custody can help to prevent the evidence from being tampered with, altered, lost, or destroyed, and to demonstrate that the evidence is relevant, reliable, and original12. Contacting law enforcement (A) is not the PRIMARY step for an organizational response to a security incident if civil litigation is a goal, but rather a possible or optional step depending on the nature, severity, and jurisdiction of the incident. Contacting law enforcement may help to obtain legal assistance, guidance, or support, but it may also involve risks such as loss of control, confidentiality, or reputation.Therefore, contacting law enforcement should be done after careful consideration of the legal obligations, contractual agreements, and organizational policies12. Capturing evidence using standard server-backup utilities is not the PRIMARY step for an organizational response to a security incident if civil litigation is a goal, but rather a technical step that should be done after documenting the chain of custody. Capturing evidence using standard server-backup utilities may help to preserve the state of the systems or networks involved in the incident, but it may also introduce changes or errors that could compromise the validity or quality of the evidence.Therefore, capturing evidence using standard server-backup utilities should be done using forensically sound methods and tools, and following the documented chain of custody12. Rebooting affected machines in a secure area to search for evidence (D) is not the PRIMARY step for an organizational response to a security incident if civil litigation is a goal, but rather a technical step that should be done after documenting the chain of custody. Rebooting affected machines in a secure area may help to isolate and analyze the systems or networks involved in the incident, but it may also cause the loss or alteration of the evidence, such as volatile memory, temporary files, or logs.Therefore, rebooting affected machines in a secure area should be done with caution and following the documented chain of custody12.Reference=1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 310-3111;2: CISM Domain 4: Information Security Incident Management (ISIM) [2022 update]2

= Developing the test plan is the task that should be performed once a disaster recovery plan (DRP) has been developed. The test plan is a document that describes the objectives, scope, methods, and procedures for testing the DRP. The test plan should also define the roles and responsibilities of the test team, the test scenarios and criteria, the test schedule and resources, and the test reporting and evaluation. The purpose of testing the DRP is to verify its effectiveness, identify any gaps or weaknesses, and improve its reliability and usability. Testing the DRP also helps to increase the awareness and readiness of the staff and stakeholders involved in the disaster recovery process. Analyzing the business impact, defining response team roles, and identifying recovery time objectives (RTOs) are all tasks that should be performed before developing the DRP, not after. These tasks are part of the business continuity planning (BCP) process, which aims to identify the critical business functions and assets, assess the potential threats and impacts, and determine the recovery strategies and requirements. The DRP is a subset of the BCP that focuses on restoring the IT systems and services after a disaster.Therefore, the DRP should be based on the results of the BCP process, and tested after it has been developed.Reference= CISM Review Manual 2023, page 2181; CISM Practice Quiz2

= The information security manager's first course of action in this situation should be to conduct a risk assessment, which is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the information security risks that arise from the violation of the policy prohibiting the use of cameras at the office. The risk assessment can help to determine the likelihood and impact of the unauthorized or inappropriate use of the cameras on the smartphones and tablet computers, such as capturing, transmitting, or disclosing sensitive or confidential information, compromising the privacy or security of the employees, customers, or partners, or violating the legal or regulatory requirements. The risk assessment can also help to identify and prioritize the appropriate risk treatment options, such as implementing technical, administrative, or physical controls to disable, restrict, or monitor the camera usage, enforcing the policy compliance and awareness, or revising the policy to reflect the current business needs and environment. The risk assessment can also help to communicate and report the risk level and status to the senior management and the relevant stakeholders, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the policy and the risk management process.

Revising the policy, performing a root cause analysis, and communicating the acceptable use policy are all possible courses of action that the information security manager can take after conducting the risk assessment, but they are not the first ones. Revising the policy is a process of updating and modifying the policy to align with the business objectives and strategy, to address the changes and challenges in the business and threat environment, and to incorporate the feedback and suggestions from the risk assessment and the stakeholders. Performing a root cause analysis is a process of investigating and identifying the underlying causes and factors that led to the violation of the policy, such as the lack of awareness, training, or enforcement, the inconsistency or ambiguity of the policy, or the conflict or gap between the policy and the business requirements or expectations.Communicating the acceptable use policy is a process of informing and educating the employees and the other users of the smartphones and tablet computers about the purpose, scope, and content of the policy, the roles and responsibilities of the users, the benefits and consequences of complying or violating the policy, and the methods and channels of reporting or resolving any policy issues or incidents.Reference= CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 51-531; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1482

When responding to a major security incident that could disrupt the business, the information security manager's most important course of action is to follow the escalation process. The escalation process is a predefined set of steps and procedures that define who should be notified, when, how, and with what information in the event of a security incident. The escalation process helps to ensure that the appropriate stakeholders, such as senior management, business units, legal counsel, public relations, and external parties, are informed and involved in the incident response process. The escalation process also helps to coordinate the actions and decisions of the incident response team and the business continuity team, and to align the incident response objectives with the business priorities and goals. The escalation process should be documented and communicated as part of the incident response plan, and should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect the changes in the organization's structure, roles, and responsibilities.

Reference=

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1631

CISM 2020: Incident Management and Response, video 32

Incident Response Models3

A business impact analysis (BIA) is the process of identifying and evaluating the potential effects of disruptions to critical business functions or processes. A BIA helps to determine the recovery priorities, objectives, and strategies for the organization in the event of a disaster or crisis. A BIA also helps to identify the worst-case disruption scenarios, which are the scenarios that would cause the most severe impact to the organization in terms of financial, operational, reputational, or legal consequences. By conducting a BIA, the organization can assess the likelihood and impact of various disruption scenarios, and plan accordingly to mitigate the risks and ensure business continuity and resilience.Reference= CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 181, page 183.

Topic 2, Exam Pool B

The best way to ensure that frequently encountered incidents are reflected in the user security awareness training program is to include examples of help desk requests. Help desk requests are requests for assistance or support from users who encounter problems or issues related to information security, such as password resets, malware infections, phishing emails, unauthorized access, data loss, or system errors. Help desk requests can provide valuable insights into the types, frequencies, and impacts of the incidents that affect the users, as well as the users' knowledge, skills, and behaviors regarding information security.By including examples of help desk requests in the user security awareness training program, the information security manager can achieve the following benefits12:

Increase the relevance and effectiveness of the training content: By using real-life scenarios and cases that the users have experienced or witnessed, the information security manager can make the training content more relevant, engaging, and applicable to the users' needs and situations. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to illustrate the consequences and costs of the incidents, and to highlight the best practices and solutions to prevent or resolve them. This can help the users to understand the importance and value of information security, and to improve their knowledge, skills, and attitudes accordingly.

Identify and address the gaps and weaknesses in the training program: By analyzing the patterns and trends of the help desk requests, the information security manager can identify and address the gaps and weaknesses in the existing training program, such as outdated or inaccurate information, insufficient or ineffective coverage of topics, or lack of feedback or evaluation. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to measure and monitor the impact and outcomes of the training program, such as changes in the number, type, or severity of the incidents, or changes in the users' satisfaction, performance, or behavior.

Enhance the communication and collaboration with the users and the help desk staff: By including examples of help desk requests in the user security awareness training program, the information security manager can enhance the communication and collaboration with the users and the help desk staff, who are the key stakeholders and partners in information security. The information security manager can use the examples of help desk requests to solicit feedback, suggestions, or questions from the users and the help desk staff, and to provide them with timely and relevant information, guidance, or support. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to recognize and appreciate the efforts and contributions of the users and the help desk staff in reporting, responding, or resolving the incidents, and to encourage and motivate them to continue their involvement and participation in information security.

The other options are not the best way to ensure that frequently encountered incidents are reflected in the user security awareness training program, as they are less reliable, relevant, or effective sources of information. Results of exit interviews are feedback from employees who are leaving the organization, and they may not reflect the current or future incidents that the remaining or new employees may face. Previous training sessions are records of the past training activities, and they may not capture the changes or updates in the information security environment, threats, or requirements.Responses to security questionnaires are answers to predefined questions or surveys, and they may not cover all the possible or emerging incidents that the users may encounter or experience12.Reference=Information Security Awareness Training: Best Practices - Infosec Resources,How to Create an Effective Security Awareness Training Program - Infosec Resources,Security Awareness Training: How to Build a Successful Program - ISACA,Security Awareness Training: How to Educate Your Employees - ISACA

An information security policy is the MOST helpful for aligning security operations with the IT governance framework because it defines the security objectives, principles, standards, and guidelines that guide the security operations activities and processes. An information security policy also establishes the roles and responsibilities, authorities and accountabilities, and reporting and communication mechanisms for security operations. An information security policy should be aligned with the IT governance framework, which provides the direction, structure, and oversight for the effective management and delivery of IT services and resources.An information security policy should also be consistent with the enterprise governance framework, which sets the vision, mission, values, and goals of the organization12. A security risk assessment (A) is helpful for identifying and evaluating the security risks that may affect the security operations and the IT governance framework, but it is not the MOST helpful for aligning them.A security risk assessment should be based on the information security policy, which defines the risk appetite, tolerance, and criteria for the organization12. A security operations program (B) is helpful for implementing and executing the security operations activities and processes that support the IT governance framework, but it is not the MOST helpful for aligning them.A security operations program should be derived from the information security policy, which provides the strategic direction and guidance for the security operations12. A business impact analysis (BIA) (D) is helpful for determining the criticality and priority of the business processes and functions that depend on the security operations and the IT governance framework, but it is not the MOST helpful for aligning them.A BIA should be conducted in accordance with the information security policy, which specifies the business continuity and disaster recovery requirements and objectives for the organization12.Reference=1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 75-76, 81-82, 88-89, 93-941;2: CISM Domain 1: Information Security Governance (ISG) [2022 update]2

The reduction of organizational risk is the desired outcome that best supports a decision to invest in a new security initiative. The organizational risk is the level of exposure or uncertainty that the organization faces in achieving its objectives. The organizational risk is influenced by various factors, such as the threat landscape, the vulnerability of the assets, the impact of the incidents, and the effectiveness of the controls. The information security manager should evaluate the organizational risk and propose security initiatives that can reduce the risk to an acceptable level. The security initiatives should be aligned with the business goals, the risk appetite, and the available resources of the organization. The security initiatives should also provide a positive return on investment (ROI) or value for money (VFM) for the organization. The reduction of organizational risk is the ultimate goal and benefit of any security initiative, as it enhances the security posture, performance, and resilience of the organization. Enhanced security monitoring and reporting, reduced control complexity, and enhanced threat detection capability are all possible outcomes of security initiatives, but they are not the best ones to support a decision to invest in a new security initiative. These outcomes are more specific and technical, and they may not directly relate to the business objectives or the risk appetite of the organization. These outcomes are also intermediate or enabling, rather than final or ultimate, as they may not necessarily lead to the reduction of organizational risk. For example, enhanced security monitoring and reporting may improve the visibility and awareness of the security status, but it may not prevent or mitigate the incidents. Reduced control complexity may simplify the security management and maintenance, but it may not address the emerging or evolving threats. Enhanced threat detection capability may increase the speed and accuracy of identifying the attacks, but it may not reduce the impact or the likelihood of the attacks.Therefore, the reduction of organizational risk is the best outcome to support a decision to invest in a new security initiative, as it demonstrates the value and effectiveness of the security initiative for the organization.Reference= CISM Review Manual 2023, page 401; CISM Practice Quiz2

= The best approach for developing a physical access control policy for the organization is to conduct a risk assessment to determine the security risks and mitigating controls that are relevant and appropriate for the organization's data center. A risk assessment is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the information security risks that could affect the availability, integrity, or confidentiality of the servers, applications, and data that are hosted in the data center. A risk assessment can help to determine the likelihood and impact of the unauthorized or inappropriate physical access to the data center, such as theft, damage, sabotage, or espionage, and the potential consequences for the organization and its customers, such as service disruption, data loss, data breach, or legal liability. A risk assessment can also help to identify and prioritize the appropriate risk treatment options, such as implementing technical, administrative, or physical controls to prevent, detect, or respond to the physical access incidents, such as locks, alarms, cameras, guards, badges, or logs. A risk assessment can also help to communicate and report the risk level and status to the senior management and the relevant stakeholders, and to provide feedback and recommendations for improvement and optimization of the physical access control policy and the risk management process.

Reviewing customers' security policies, developing access control requirements for each system and application, and designing single sign-on (SSO) or federated access are all possible steps that the organization can take after conducting the risk assessment, but they are not the best ones. Reviewing customers' security policies is a process of understanding and complying with the customers' expectations and requirements for the security of their servers, applications, and data that are hosted in the data center, and ensuring that the organization's physical access control policy is consistent and compatible with them. Developing access control requirements for each system and application is a process of defining and implementing the specific rules and criteria for granting or denying the physical access to the servers and applications that are hosted in the data center, based on the roles, responsibilities, and privileges of the users, and the sensitivity and criticality of the systems and applications.Designing single sign-on (SSO) or federated access is a process of enabling and facilitating the authentication and authorization of the users who need to access the servers and applications that are hosted in the data center, by using a single or shared identity and credential across multiple systems and domains.Reference= CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, pages 51-531; CISM Practice Quiz, question 1542