Amazon MLS-C01 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 24

Amazon Personalize is a fully managed machine learning service that makes it easy for developers to create personalized user experiences at scale. It uses the same recommender system technology that Amazon uses to create its own personalized recommendations. Amazon Personalize provides several pre-built recipes that can be used to train models for different use cases. The USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe is designed to provide personalized recommendations for existing users based on their past interactions with items. The PERSONALIZED_RANKING recipe is designed to re-rank a list of items for a user based on their preferences. The USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe is more suitable for this use case because it can generate recommendations for each user without requiring a list of candidate items. To filter out the items that the user previously purchased, a real-time filter can be created and applied to the campaign. A real-time filter is a dynamic filter that uses the latest interaction data to exclude items from the recommendations. By using Amazon Personalize, the development effort is minimized because it handles the data processing, model training, and deployment automatically. The web application can use the GetRecommendations API operation to get the real-time recommendations from the campaign.References:

Amazon Personalize

What is Amazon Personalize?

USER_PERSONALIZATION recipe

PERSONALIZED_RANKING recipe

Filtering recommendations

GetRecommendations API operation

The most cost-effective solution is to use an S3 event to trigger a Lambda function that uses SageMaker Data Wrangler to merge the data. This solution avoids the need to provision and manage any additional resources, such as Kinesis streams, Firehose delivery streams, Glue jobs, or Redshift clusters. SageMaker Data Wrangler provides a visual interface to import, prepare, transform, and analyze data from various sources, including AWS Data Exchange products. It can also export the data preparation workflow to a Python script that can be executed by a Lambda function. This solution can meet the time requirement of 30-60 minutes, depending on the size and complexity of the data.

References:

Using Amazon S3 Event Notifications

Prepare ML Data with Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler

AWS Lambda Function

The SageMaker image classification algorithm supports both RecordIO and image content types for training in file mode, and supports the RecordIO content type for training in pipe mode1.However, the algorithm also supports training in pipe mode using the image files without creating RecordIO files, by using the augmented manifest format2. In this case, the company should generate

The best indicators that an ML-based solution is suitable for this scenario are D and E, because they imply that the historical sensor data is sufficient and relevant for building a predictive maintenance model.This model can use machine learning techniques such as regression, classification, or anomaly detection to learn from the past data and forecast future failures or issues12.Having high granularity and diversity of data can improve the accuracy and generalization of the model, as well as enable the detection of complex patterns and relationships that are not captured by simple rule-based thresholds3.

The other options are not good indicators that an ML-based solution is suitable, because they suggest that the historical sensor data is incomplete, inconsistent, or inadequate for building a predictive maintenance model.These options would require additional data collection, preprocessing, or augmentation to overcome the data quality issues and ensure that the model can handle different scenarios and types of cranes4.

References:

1:Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Maintenance

2:A Guide to Predictive Maintenance & Machine Learning

3:Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance: Reinventing Asset Upkeep

4:Predictive Maintenance with Machine Learning: A Complete Guide

: [Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance - AWS Online Tech Talks]

To count the number of students who are in a class, the solution needs to detect and locate each student in the video frame. Object detection is a computer vision model that can identify and locate multiple objects in an image. To differentiate students who are performing a stretch correctly from students who are performing a stretch incorrectly, the solution needs to measure the location and angle of each student's arms and legs. Pose estimation is a computer vision model that can estimate the pose of a person by detecting the position and orientation of key body parts. Image classification, OCR, and image GANs are not relevant for this use case.References:

Object Detection: A computer vision technique that identifies and locates objects within an image or video.

Pose Estimation: A computer vision technique that estimates the pose of a person by detecting the position and orientation of key body parts.

Amazon SageMaker: A fully managed service that provides every developer and data scientist with the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning (ML) models quickly.

The best Amazon SageMaker algorithm for this task is Image Classification - TensorFlow. This algorithm is a supervised learning algorithm that supports transfer learning with many pretrained models from the TensorFlow Hub. Transfer learning allows the company to fine-tune one of the available pretrained models on their own dataset, even if a large amount of image data is not available. The image classification algorithm takes an image as input and outputs a probability for each provided class label. The company can choose from a variety of models, such as MobileNet, ResNet, or Inception, depending on their accuracy and speed requirements. The algorithm also supports distributed training, data augmentation, and hyperparameter tuning.

References:

Image Classification - TensorFlow - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker Provides New Built-in TensorFlow Image Classification Algorithm

Image Classification with ResNet :: Amazon SageMaker Workshop

Image classification on Amazon SageMaker | by Julien Simon - Medium

The correct answer is D because it allows the company to use the existing SageMaker endpoint and leverage the built-in functionality of production variants for A/B testing.Production variants can be used to test ML models that have been trained using different training datasets, algorithms, and ML frameworks; test how they perform on different instance types; or a combination of all of the above1. By specifying the weight for each production variant in the endpoint configuration, the company can control how much traffic to send to each variant.By setting the TargetVariant header in the request, the company can invoke a specific variant directly for each request2. This enables the company to implement the required A/B testing setup without creating additional endpoints or load balancers.

References:

1: Production variants - Amazon SageMaker

2: A/B Testing ML models in production using Amazon SageMaker | AWS Machine Learning Blog

The correct combination of actions to enable the data scientist's IAM user to invoke the SageMaker endpoint is B, C, and E, because they ensure that the IAM user has the necessary permissions, access, and syntax to query the ML model from Athena. These actions have the following benefits:

B: Including a policy statement for the IAM user that allows the sagemaker:InvokeEndpoint action grants the IAM user the permission to call the SageMaker Runtime InvokeEndpoint API, which is used to get inferences from the model hosted at the endpoint1.

C: Including an inline policy for the IAM user that allows SageMaker to read S3 objects enables the IAM user to access the data stored in S3, which is the source of the Athena queries2.

E: Including the SQL statement ''USING EXTERNAL FUNCTION ml_function_name'' in the Athena SQL query allows the IAM user to invoke the ML model as an external function from Athena, which is a feature that enables querying ML models from SQL statements3.

The other options are not correct or necessary, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Attaching the AmazonAthenaFullAccess AWS managed policy to the user identity is not sufficient, because it does not grant the IAM user the permission to invoke the SageMaker endpoint, which is required to query the ML model4.

D: Including a policy statement for the IAM user that allows the IAM user to perform the sagemaker:GetRecord action is not relevant, because this action is used to retrieve a single record from a feature group, which is not the case in this scenario5.

F: Performing a user remapping in SageMaker to map the IAM user to another IAM user that is on the hosted endpoint is not applicable, because this feature is only available for multi-model endpoints, which are not used in this scenario.

References:

1:InvokeEndpoint - Amazon SageMaker

2:Querying Data in Amazon S3 from Amazon Athena - Amazon Athena

3:Querying machine learning models from Amazon Athena using Amazon SageMaker | AWS Machine Learning Blog

4:AmazonAthenaFullAccess - AWS Identity and Access Management

5:GetRecord - Amazon SageMaker Feature Store Runtime

: [Invoke a Multi-Model Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker]

The company needs to transcribe petabytes of audio files from an on-premises VoIP system to an S3 bucket in the AWS Cloud. The transcription algorithm requires GPUs for inference, which are not available on the on-premises system. The VPN connection over a 100 Mbps connection is not sufficient to transfer the large amount of data quickly. Therefore, the company should use an AWS Snowball Edge Compute Optimized device with an NVIDIA Tesla module to run the transcription algorithm locally and leverage the GPU power. The device can store up to 42 TB of data and can be shipped back to AWS for data ingestion. The company can use AWS DataSync to send the resulting transcriptions to the transcription S3 bucket in the AWS Cloud. This solution minimizes the network bandwidth and latency issues and enables faster data processing and transfer.

Option B is incorrect because AWS Snowcone is a small, portable, rugged, and secure edge computing and data transfer device that can store up to 8 TB of data. It is not suitable for processing petabytes of data and does not support GPU-based instances.

Option C is incorrect because AWS Outposts is a service that extends AWS infrastructure, services, APIs, and tools to virtually any data center, co-location space, or on-premises facility. It is not designed for data transfer and ingestion, and it would require additional infrastructure and maintenance costs.

Option D is incorrect because AWS DataSync is a service that makes it easy to move large amounts of data to and from AWS over the internet or AWS Direct Connect. However, using DataSync to ingest the audio files to S3 would still be limited by the network bandwidth and latency. Moreover, running the transcription algorithm on AWS Lambda would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the GPU power that the algorithm requires.

References:

AWS Snowball Edge Compute Optimized

AWS DataSync

AWS Snowcone

AWS Outposts

AWS Lambda