Isaca CISA Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 107

Transaction tagging is a technique by which transactions are marked with unique identifiers or headers and traced through the system using agents or sensors at each processing point1.Transaction tagging allows for continuous monitoring and analysis of transaction processing in a high-volume, real-time system by providing visibility into the performance, availability, and reliability of each transaction and its components1.Transaction tagging can also help to identify and isolate errors, bottlenecks, anomalies, and security issues in the system1.

This is because the follow-up of agreed corrective actions for reported audit issues should be done after the auditee has had enough time to implement the corrective actions and demonstrate their effectiveness and sustainability.The follow-up audit should not be too soon or too late, but based on a reasonable and realistic timeframe that allows for adequate testing and verification of the control operation12.

Answer A. Progress updates indicate that the implementation of agreed actions is on track. is not the best answer, because progress updates are not sufficient to guide the follow-up audit timing. Progress updates are useful for monitoring and communicating the status and challenges of the corrective actions, but they do not provide conclusive evidence of the control operation.The follow-up audit should be based on actual results and outcomes, not on expectations or projections12.

Answer C. Business management has completed the implementation of agreed actions on schedule. is not the best answer, because the completion of the implementation of agreed actions is not enough to guide the follow-up audit timing. The completion of the implementation only indicates that the auditee has taken the necessary steps to address the audit issues, but it does not guarantee that the corrective actions are effective and sustainable.The follow-up audit should be based on the evaluation and validation of the control operation, not on the completion of the control implementation12.

Answer D. Regulators have announced a timeline for an inspection visit. is not the best answer, because the regulators' inspection visit is not relevant to guide the follow-up audit timing. The regulators' inspection visit is an external factor that may or may not coincide with the internal follow-up audit schedule.The follow-up audit should be based on the internal audit plan and objectives, not on the external audit requirements or expectations12.

This is because the auditor's primary objective is to evaluate the adequacy and performance of the business continuity plan (BCP) in ensuring the continuity and resilience of the organization's critical functions and processes during a disruption. The auditor should review the actual results and outcomes of the business response, such as the recovery time, recovery point, service level, customer satisfaction, and incident management, and compare them with the predefined objectives and criteria of the BCP.The auditor should also identify and analyze any gaps, issues, or lessons learned from the business response, and provide recommendations for improvement12.

Answer A. Confirm the BCP has been recently updated. is not the best answer, because it is not directly related to the auditor's course of action. Confirming the BCP has been recently updated is a part of the audit planning and scoping process, not the audit execution or reporting process. The auditor should confirm the BCP has been recently updated before conducting the audit, not after revealing that a simulation test has not been performed.Moreover, confirming the BCP has been recently updated does not provide sufficient evidence of the effectiveness of the business response12.

Answer C. Raise an audit issue for the lack of simulated testing. is not the best answer, because it is not relevant to the auditor's course of action. Raising an audit issue for the lack of simulated testing is a part of the audit reporting and follow-up process, not the audit execution or evaluation process. The auditor should raise an audit issue for the lack of simulated testing after reviewing the effectiveness of the business response, not before or instead of doing so.Furthermore, raising an audit issue for the lack of simulated testing does not address the root cause or impact of the problem, nor does it provide any constructive feedback or guidance for improvement12.

Answer D. Interview staff members to obtain commentary on the BCP's effectiveness. is not the best answer, because it is not sufficient to guide the auditor's course of action. Interviewing staff members to obtain commentary on the BCP's effectiveness is a part of the audit evidence collection and analysis process, not the audit evaluation or conclusion process. The auditor should interview staff members to obtain commentary on the BCP's effectiveness as one of the sources of information, not as the only or main source of information.Additionally, interviewing staff members to obtain commentary on the BCP's effectiveness may be subjective, biased, or incomplete, and may not reflect the actual performance or outcomes of the business response12.

Business Continuity Management Audit/Assurance Program

Business Continuity Plan Testing: Types and Best Practices

This means that the IT steering committee is responsible for ensuring that the IT strategy aligns with and supports the business strategy, vision, and goals of the organization.The IT steering committee is also responsible for overseeing and approving major IT initiatives, projects, and investments, and allocating resources and priorities accordingly12.

Developing and assessing the IT security strategy (B) is not the main responsibility of the IT steering committee, but rather a specific aspect of the IT strategy that may be delegated to a subcommittee or a dedicated security function.The IT steering committee may provide guidance and oversight for the IT security strategy, but it is not directly involved in developing and assessing it12.

Implementing processes to integrate security with business objectives is not the main responsibility of the IT steering committee, but rather an operational task that may be performed by the IT management and staff.The IT steering committee may monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the security processes, but it is not directly involved in implementing them12.

Developing and implementing the secure system development framework (D) is not the main responsibility of the IT steering committee, but rather a technical task that may be performed by the IT developers and engineers.The IT steering committee may approve and endorse the secure system development framework, but it is not directly involved in developing and implementing it12.

Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. Risk appetite reflects the organization's risk culture, strategy, and tolerance, and guides the organization's risk management practices. The most useful information about risk appetite can be obtained from the risk policies, which are the documents that define the organization's risk management framework, principles, objectives, roles, responsibilities, and processes. Risk policies also establish the criteria and thresholds for identifying, assessing, prioritizing, mitigating, and monitoring risks, as well as the reporting and escalation mechanisms for risk issues. By reviewing the risk policies, an IS auditor can evaluate whether they are consistent, comprehensive, and aligned with the organization's risk appetite and whether they provide clear guidance and direction for managing risks effectively.

The other options are not correct because they are either not the most useful or not relevant to risk appetite. Risk assessments are the processes of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the risks that may affect the organization's objectives. Risk assessments provide information about the current risk profile and exposure of the organization, but they do not indicate the organization's risk appetite or preferences. Prior audit reports are the documents that summarize the findings, recommendations, and conclusions of previous audits. Prior audit reports may provide information about the past performance and issues of the organization's risk management practices, but they do not reflect the organization's risk appetite or expectations. Management assertion is a statement or declaration made by management about the accuracy, completeness, validity, or reliability of a certain fact or data. Management assertion may provide information about the management's confidence or opinion on a specific risk or issue, but it does not represent the organization's risk appetite or criteria.

This is because audit trails are records of system activity and user actions that can provide evidence of the validity and integrity of transactions and data in a financial application system. Audit trails can help to ensure compliance with laws, regulations, policies, and standards, as well as to detect and prevent fraud, errors, or misuse of information.Audit trails can also facilitate auditing, monitoring, and evaluation of the financial application system's performance and controls1.

The application should meet the organization's requirements (A) is not the best answer, because it is a general and obvious criterion that applies to any application system acquisition, not a specific and important recommendation for a financial application system. The organization's requirements should be clearly defined and documented in the RFP, but they may not necessarily include audit trails as a design feature.

Potential suppliers should have experience in the relevant area is not the best answer, because it is a factor that affects the selection of the supplier, not the design of the financial application system. The experience and reputation of potential suppliers should be evaluated and verified during the RFP process, but they may not guarantee that the supplier will include audit trails in the design.

This is because the business processes are the core activities and functions that enable the organization to achieve its objectives and create value for its stakeholders. The business processes are also the sources and drivers of various risks that may affect the organization's performance, compliance, and reputation.Therefore, the IS auditor should focus on understanding, assessing, and prioritizing the business processes that are most critical, complex, or vulnerable to the organization's success, and align the audit objectives, scope, and resources accordingly12.

Critical business applications (A) are not the most important area of focus for an IS auditor when developing a risk-based audit strategy, but rather a specific aspect of the business processes that may require attention. Critical business applications are the software systems that support the execution and automation of the business processes, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP), customer relationship management (CRM), or accounting systems. Critical business applications may pose significant risks to the organization if they are not reliable, secure, or efficient.Therefore, the IS auditor should consider the criticality, functionality, and dependency of the business applications when planning the audit, but not as the primary focus12.

Existing IT controls are not the most important area of focus for an IS auditor when developing a risk-based audit strategy, but rather an outcome or output of the risk assessment process. Existing IT controls are the policies, procedures, practices, and technologies that are implemented to manage and mitigate the IT-related risks that may affect the organization's business processes and objectives. Existing IT controls may vary in their design, effectiveness, and maturity.Therefore, the IS auditor should evaluate and test the existing IT controls as part of the audit execution and reporting process, but not as the main focus12.

Recent audit results (D) are not the most important area of focus for an IS auditor when developing a risk-based audit strategy, but rather an input or source of information for the risk assessment process. Recent audit results are the findings, recommendations, and opinions of previous audits that may provide insights or feedback on the organization's business processes, risks, and controls. Recent audit results may also indicate any changes or trends in the organization's risk profile or environment.Therefore, the IS auditor should review and consider the recent audit results as part of the audit planning and scoping process, but not as the main focus12.

This is because analyzing the data against predefined specifications is a method of data quality assessment that can help the organization achieve a reasonable level of data quality. Data quality assessment is the process of measuring and evaluating the accuracy, completeness, consistency, timeliness, validity, and usability of the data. Predefined specifications are the criteria or standards that define the expected or desired quality of the data.By comparing the actual data with the predefined specifications, the organization can identify and quantify any gaps, errors, or deviations in the data quality, and take corrective actions accordingly12.

Reviewing data against data classification standards (A) is not the best answer, because it is not a method of data quality assessment, but rather a method of data security management. Data classification standards are the rules or guidelines that define the level of sensitivity and confidentiality of the data, and determine the appropriate security and access controls for the data. For example, data can be classified into public, internal, confidential, or restricted categories.Reviewing data against data classification standards can help the organization protect the data from unauthorized or inappropriate use or disclosure, but it does not directly improve the data quality3.

Outsourcing data cleansing to skilled service providers (B) is not the best answer, because it is not a recommendation to help the organization achieve a reasonable level of data quality, but rather a decision to delegate or transfer the responsibility of data quality management to external parties. Data cleansing is the process of detecting and correcting any errors, inconsistencies, or anomalies in the data. Skilled service providers are third-party vendors or contractors that have the expertise and resources to perform data cleansing tasks.Outsourcing data cleansing to skilled service providers may have some benefits, such as cost savings, efficiency, or scalability, but it also has some risks, such as loss of control, dependency, or liability4.

Consolidating data stored across separate databases into a warehouse is not the best answer, because it is not a method of data quality assessment, but rather a method of data integration and storage. Data integration is the process of combining and transforming data from different sources and formats into a unified and consistent view. Data warehouse is a centralized repository that stores integrated and historical data for analytical purposes. Consolidating data stored across separate databases into a warehouse can help the organization improve the availability and accessibility of the data, but it does not necessarily improve the data quality.

The primary benefit of a tabletop exercise for an incident response plan is to increase confidence in the team's response readiness (D). A tabletop exercise is a simulated scenario that tests the effectiveness and efficiency of the incident response plan and team. It allows the team to practice their roles and responsibilities, review their procedures and tools, and identify and resolve any gaps or issues in their response process.A tabletop exercise can help the team to improve their skills, knowledge, and communication, and to prepare for real incidents1.