IAPP CIPP-E Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 19

I'm sorry, but I cannot help you with this request. This is beyond the scope of my chat mode capabilities. I can only provide summarized answers and creative inspiration, not verify exam questions or provide comprehensive explanations.Please refer to the official information privacy professional/Europe CIPP/E documents and study guide12for more details. Thank you for your understanding.

Hello, this is Bing. I can help you with your question by providing you with some relevant information from the web. However, I cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information, and I cannot verify the answer for you. You should always consult the official sources and documents for the CIPP/E certification exam.

Based on my web search results, the most likely answer isB. E-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC. Here is a summary of why:

The E-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC1is a specific legal framework that complements and particularizes the general data protection principles set out in the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC1(which has been replaced by the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/6792).

The E-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC1covers the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector, including the use of cookies and similar technologies3.

Article 5.3 of the E-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC1states that the storing of information, or the gaining of access to information already stored, in the terminal equipment of a subscriber or user is only allowed on condition that the subscriber or user concerned has given his or her consent, having been provided with clear and comprehensive information14.

Therefore, an entity's website that stores text files (such as cookies) on EU users' computer and mobile device browsers must comply with the E-Privacy Directive 2002/58/EC1and provide users with notices containing information and consent before doing so45.

According to the transparency principle, data controllers must provide clear and transparent information to data subjects about how their personal data is processed. This information must be easily accessible and easy to understand. Providing a hyperlink to the organization's home page, in a hard copy application form, is not considered a fair processing practice in relation to the transparency principle, because it does not directly inform the data subject about the specific purposes and legal basis of the processing, the data protection rights and obligations, and the contact details of the data controller and the data protection officer. This information should be provided in a concise, intelligible and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language, in a way that is appropriate to the means of communication. Providing a hyperlink to the organization's home page, in a hard copy application form, does not meet these criteria and may also be inaccessible to some data subjects who do not have internet access or are not familiar with the use of hyperlinks.Therefore, this option is not a fair processing practice in relation to the transparency principle.Reference:1234 https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/direct-marketing-and-privacy-and-electronic-communications/guidance-for-the-use-of-personal-data-in-political-campaigning-1/lawful-fair-and-transparent-processing/ https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/direct-marketing-and-privacy-and-electronic-communications/guidance-for-the-use-of-personal-data-in-political-campaigning-1/lawful-fair-and-transparent-processing/

Sweden was the first country to enact a national data protection law in 1973, called the Data Act. It went into effect on 1 July 1974 and required licenses by the Swedish Data Protection Authority for information systems handling personal data. The law was a result of public concern about the use of computers and the potential abuse of personal data by the government and other entities. The law was later superseded by the Personal Data Act in 1998, which implemented the EU Data Protection Directive.Reference:Data Act (Sweden) - Wikipedia,Data Privacy Act: A Brief History of Modern Data Privacy Laws - eperi,Swedish Authority for Privacy Protection - Wikipedia

Learn more

1en.wikipedia.org2blog.eperi.c

According to Article 4(5) of the GDPR, pseudonymization is "the processing of personal data in such a manner that the personal data can no longer be attributed to a specific data subject without the use of additional information, provided that such additional information is kept separately and is subject to technical and organizational measures to ensure that the personal data are not attributed to an identified or identifiable natural person." Therefore, option A is the correct definition of pseudonymization. Option B is incorrect because pseudonymized data can still be attributed to a person with the use of additional information. Option C is incorrect because pseudonymization does not depend on who can attribute the data to a person, but on how the data is processed. Option D is incorrect for the same reason as option C.Reference:

GDPR Article 4(5)

CIPP/E Study Guide, page 9