Ask Question
Certified Platform App Builder: Salesforce Certified Platform App Builder
The Certified Platform App Builder exam is a crucial step for anyone looking to develop and build applications on the Salesforce Platform. To increase your chances of success, practicing with real exam questions shared by those who have already passed can be incredibly helpful. In this guide, we’ll provide practice test questions and answers, offering insights directly from successful candidates.
Why Use Certified Platform App Builder Practice Test?
- Real Exam Experience: Our practice tests accurately mirror the format and difficulty of the actual Certified Platform App Builder exam, providing you with a realistic preparation experience.
- Identify Knowledge Gaps: Practicing with these tests helps you pinpoint areas that need more focus, allowing you to study more effectively.
- Boost Confidence: Regular practice builds confidence and reduces test anxiety.
- Track Your Progress: Monitor your performance to see improvements and adjust your study plan accordingly.
Key Features of Certified Platform App Builder Practice Test
- Up-to-Date Content: Our community regularly updates the questions to reflect the latest exam objectives and technology trends.
- Detailed Explanations: Each question comes with detailed explanations, helping you understand the correct answers and learn from any mistakes.
- Comprehensive Coverage: The practice tests cover all key topics of the Certified Platform App Builder exam, including data modeling, user interface, business logic, and security.
- Customizable Practice: Tailor your study experience by creating practice sessions based on specific topics or difficulty levels.
Exam Details
- Exam Number: Platform App Builder
- Exam Name: Certified Platform App Builder Exam
- Length of Test: 105 minutes
- Exam Format: Multiple-choice and scenario-based questions
- Exam Language: English
- Number of Questions in the Actual Exam: 60 questions
- Passing Score: 63%
Use the member-shared Certified Platform App Builder Practice Tests to ensure you're fully prepared for your certification exam. Start practicing today and take a significant step towards achieving your certification goals!
Related questions
Ursa Major Solar wants to convert the relationship between Galaxy and Star from a lookup relationship to a master-detail relationship so each Galaxy record can be equipped with a roll-up summary count of Star records.
Which two considerations should be made?
Choose 2 answers
The two considerations that should be made are: The Star records are all required to have an existing value in their Galaxy field. This is a prerequisite for converting a lookup relationship to a master-detail relationship. A lookup relationship is an optional relationship that links two objects together, but does not enforce referential integrity or cascade delete. A master-detail relationship is a required relationship that links two objects together and enforces referential integrity and cascade delete. To convert a lookup relationship to a master-detail relationship, all child records must have a value in their lookup field that references an existing parent record. The Galaxy object has fewer than two existing master-detail relationships. This is another prerequisite for converting a lookup relationship to a master-detail relationship. An object can have up to two master-detail relationships with other objects and can act as both the parent and child in different relationships. To convert a lookup relationship to a master-detail relationship, the parent object must have fewer than two existing master-detail relationships with other objects. The Galaxy object is required to contain existing roll-up summary fields is not a valid consideration, as it is not related to converting a lookup relationship to a master-detail relationship.
Universal Containers wants to streamline its data capture process by linking fields together. They wish to do this so that the available value on dependents fields are driven by value selected on controlling fields. Which consideration supports the stated requirements? Choose 3 answers
Unlock Premium Member
What are two capabilities of Schema Builder? Choose 2 answers
To increase adoption, Universal Containers is proposing changes to its Salesforce data model to allow easier visibility for sales reps into key metrics. The proposal has three custom objectsrelated to the Account object, one with a master-detail, and two that are not. Each of these objects has 15 fields they would like to summarize on the Account object.
What are two considerations for this proposal?
Choose 2 answers
What are the limitations of Schema Builder when creating a custom object?
What is the process to upgrade an unmanaged package that is currently installed in production?
universal containers has several large customers that sell their products through dealers. Each customer and dealer have an individual rep who works directly with uc and each is billed separately. How can an app builder implement these requirements?
Creating both customer and dealer as accounts, creating account teams on each account and associating the dealer records with the parent account would allow UC to track each customer and dealer separately, as well as their relationships and reps.Account hierarchy is not suitable for this scenario, as it is used to show the relationships among parent and child accounts within a single company
At Universal Containers, the VP of Service has requested a visual indicator flag on each case, based on the case priority. High-priority cases should be flagged red, medium-priority should be flagged yellow, and low-priority cases should be flagged green. Which formula would accomplish this requirement? Choose 2 answers
The formula for creating a visual indicator flag on each case based on the case priority should use the IMAGE and CASE functions. The IMAGE function returns an image for a given URL, and the CASE function evaluates an expression and returns a value based on that expression. Option A and D use these functions correctly, while option B and C do not.
AW Computing has a custom object for service plans.
A service plan needs to be associated to one and only one contact. The support manager noticed if the wrong contact is associated, the reps are unable to change the contact. The app builder already confirmed the user has correct access to the field and there are no validations associated with the service plans.
What could be causing the issue?
The app builder needs to change the data types of new custom fields. The app builder is not able to delete and recreate any of the fields, nor modify any apex code. Which data type change will require the app builder to perform the additional steps in order to retain existing functionalities?
Export
If you didn't receive an email within 5 minutes, you should submit a support request to [email protected].
|
BASIC - 1 Month
$
3
Full latest questions
No CAPTCHA
New Updates
Export to VPLUS
Export to PDF - All questions
Team support
|
PLUS - 2 Months
$
10
Full latest questions
No CAPTCHA
New Updates
Export to VPLUS
Export to PDF - All questions
Team support
|
PRO - 6 Months
$
20
Full latest questions
No CAPTCHA
New Updates
Export to VPLUS
Export to PDF - All questions
Team support
|
Full latest questions
No CAPTCHA
New Updates
Export to VPLUS
Export to PDF - All questions
Team support
Full latest questions
No CAPTCHA
New Updates
Export to VPLUS
Export to PDF - All questions
Team support
Full latest questions
No CAPTCHA
New Updates
Export to VPLUS
Export to PDF - All questions
Team support
Practice Tests
Selling illegal goods, money scams etc.
Serious attack on a group.
Harassing an individual (including doxing)
Threatening or glorifying violence or serious harm, including self-harm
Nudity/Sexual content
Sexually explicit or suggestive imagery or writing involving minors
Sexually explicit or suggestive imagery or writing involving non-consenting adults or non-humans
Reusing content without attribution (link and blockquotes)
Not in English or has very bad formatting, grammar, and spelling
Author's credential is offensive, spam, or impersonation
Ex. Illegal content, incomplete question...
Question