Question 6 - PSPO-II discussion

: Sharing people with unique skills across multiple teams will likely result in teams having to wait more often for those people to be available, impeding the delivery of value.This is because those people will have to context-switch between different teams, products, and domains, reducing their focus and efficiency1.Moreover, sharing people with unique skills will create bottlenecks and dependencies in the delivery process, increasing the risk of delays and quality issues2.Furthermore, sharing people with unique skills will discourage teams from developing deep technical skills themselves, making them less cross-functional and self-organizing3. Therefore, the best answer is A.

The other options are not correct because:

B) Teams do not have to develop deep technical skills. This is not a desirable condition, as it contradicts the Scrum value of commitment and the principle of continuous improvement.Teams should strive to develop deep technical skills to deliver high-quality products and to respond to changing requirements and technologies4.

C) Costs are lower since expensive resources are shared. This is not necessarily true, as the costs of context-switching, waiting, and quality issues may outweigh the benefits of sharing resources.Moreover, this option implies a resource-oriented mindset, rather than a value-oriented mindset, which is not aligned with the Scrum framework and the Product Owner role5.

D) More work gets done since people are better utilized. This is not a valid measure of success, as the amount of work done does not reflect the value delivered.Moreover, this option implies a utilization-oriented mindset, rather than an outcome-oriented mindset, which is not aligned with the Scrum framework and the Product Owner role.Reference:1: Context Switching,2: Bottlenecks and Dependencies,3: Cross-Functional Teams,4: Technical Excellence,5: Resource vs. Value Orientation, : Utilization vs. Outcome Orientation