APICS CSCP Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 19
List of questions
Related questions
Question 181
Which of the following types of lead times is related most closely to a supplier performance measure?
Explanation:
Replenishment lead time is closely related to a supplier performance measure because it specifically focuses on the time it takes for a supplier to deliver goods once an order is placed. Here's the detailed explanation:
Replenishment Lead Time Definition: This is the amount of time from when a supplier receives an order until the goods are delivered to the buyer.
Supplier Performance: Replenishment lead time directly measures a supplier's efficiency in fulfilling orders, highlighting their ability to manage production, processing, and logistics.
Impact on Operations: Shorter replenishment lead times indicate a supplier's ability to quickly respond to orders, which is crucial for maintaining optimal inventory levels and meeting customer demand.
Performance Metrics: Companies use replenishment lead time to assess supplier reliability, predictability, and consistency, which are key factors in supply chain performance.
Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation.
Question 182
Which of the following strategies is most appropriate for managing unknown risks in a global supply chain?
Explanation:
Investing in redundancy is the most appropriate strategy for managing unknown risks in a global supply chain. Here's a detailed explanation:
Unknown Risks: These are risks that cannot be predicted or quantified accurately, such as natural disasters, political instability, or sudden supply chain disruptions.
Redundancy Strategy:
Multiple Suppliers: Engaging multiple suppliers for critical components to ensure that if one supplier fails, another can step in.
Backup Inventory: Keeping additional inventory at strategic locations to buffer against supply disruptions.
Diversified Sourcing: Sourcing from different geographic locations to mitigate regional risks.
Risk Mitigation: Redundancy helps in spreading risk across multiple sources and ensures continuity in the supply chain despite unforeseen events.
Resilience: Building redundancy into the supply chain enhances resilience, enabling the company to respond and recover quickly from disruptions.
Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management.
Sheffi, Y. (2005). The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage.
Question 183
Which of the following performance indicators can be used to measure the effectiveness of a vendor-managed inventory program?
Explanation:
The in-stock rate is a key performance indicator used to measure the effectiveness of a vendor-managed inventory (VMI) program. Here's a detailed explanation:
In-Stock Rate Definition: The in-stock rate is the percentage of time that a product is available in inventory and ready for sale or use. It indicates the ability of the inventory management system to meet customer demand without stockouts.
Importance in VMI:
VMI Program: In a VMI setup, the vendor is responsible for managing and replenishing inventory levels based on the real-time demand data shared by the retailer or customer.
Objective: The main goal is to ensure that the right products are available at the right time, minimizing stockouts and overstock situations.
Effectiveness Measurement:
Availability: A high in-stock rate means that the products are consistently available, indicating effective inventory management by the vendor.
Customer Satisfaction: High product availability leads to better customer satisfaction as it reduces the likelihood of missing sales due to stockouts.
Operational Efficiency: Maintaining a high in-stock rate while minimizing excess inventory demonstrates the vendor's efficiency in managing the supply chain and understanding demand patterns.
Performance Tracking:
Continuous Monitoring: Regular monitoring of the in-stock rate helps in identifying trends and making necessary adjustments to inventory levels.
Benchmarking: Comparing in-stock rates over time or against industry standards can help in assessing the overall effectiveness of the VMI program.
Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies.
Stevenson, W. J. (2018). Operations Management.
Question 184
Which of the following statements best identifies the value of using a supplier rating system?
Explanation:
A supplier rating system provides an objective means for a company to determine outstanding suppliers by evaluating their performance based on standardized criteria. Here's the detailed explanation:
Objective Evaluation: Supplier rating systems utilize specific, quantifiable metrics and criteria such as quality, delivery performance, cost, and service levels to assess suppliers.
Key Performance Metrics:
Quality: Assesses the defect rate or the compliance with quality standards and specifications.
Delivery: Measures on-time delivery performance and reliability.
Cost: Evaluates pricing competitiveness, cost management, and total cost of ownership.
Service: Considers the responsiveness, communication, and support provided by the supplier.
Data-Driven Decision Making:
Standardization: By standardizing the criteria and metrics, companies can objectively compare suppliers on a level playing field.
Performance Insights: The data-driven approach provides clear insights into each supplier's strengths and weaknesses, facilitating informed decision-making.
Continuous Improvement:
Feedback Loop: Regular feedback based on the rating system helps suppliers understand their performance and areas for improvement.
Improvement Initiatives: Encourages suppliers to continuously improve their processes and performance to achieve better ratings.
Strategic Sourcing:
Supplier Development: Identifying top-performing suppliers helps companies to foster strategic partnerships and collaborate on improvement initiatives.
Negotiation Leverage: High ratings can serve as a basis for negotiating better terms, pricing, and service levels with outstanding suppliers.
Risk Management:
Mitigation: A supplier rating system helps in identifying potential risks by highlighting underperforming suppliers, allowing the company to take proactive measures.
Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management.
Burt, D. N., Petcavage, S. D., & Pinkerton, R. L. (2010). Supply Management.
Question 185
A company recently implemented a new supplier rating system. Data was collected from the enterprise resources planning system about each vendor's rating for cost, quality, and delivery over 12 months. A cutoff point was established for poor performers. The responsible purchasing agent then scheduled meetings with each supplier. Which of the following actions is most appropriate to take with suppliers whose ratings were below the cutoff point?
Explanation:
When a company implements a new supplier rating system and identifies suppliers who fall below the cutoff point for performance, the most appropriate action is to discuss ways to raise the ratings for the next review period. This involves:
Engaging in Dialogue: Scheduling meetings with underperforming suppliers allows for open communication about the performance issues and ways to address them. 2. Collaborative Improvement: Working collaboratively with suppliers to develop action plans for improvement can lead to better performance in cost, quality, and delivery.
Setting Clear Expectations: Clearly communicating the performance expectations and the consequences of not meeting them helps suppliers understand the importance of improvement.
Providing Support: Offering support and resources, such as training or process improvement suggestions, can help suppliers achieve the desired performance levels.
This approach fosters a constructive relationship and continuous improvement, rather than punitive measures that could disrupt the supply chain.
'Supplier Evaluation and Performance Excellence: A Guide to Meaningful Metrics and Successful Results' by Sherry Gordon
APICS, 'Supplier Relationship Management Basics'
Question 186
A firm experiences a supply chain interruption from a second-tier supplier. Which of the following actions is the firm likely to take to minimize future interruptions?
Explanation:
To minimize future supply chain interruptions from a second-tier supplier, the firm should map the supplier's supply chain to identify risks and opportunities. This involves:
Supply Chain Mapping: Creating a visual representation of the supplier's supply chain helps in understanding the flow of materials, components, and information.
Identifying Risks: By mapping the supply chain, the firm can identify potential points of failure, such as single-source dependencies, geographic risks, or capacity constraints.
Assessing Opportunities: Mapping also reveals opportunities for improvement, such as alternative suppliers, process enhancements, or inventory optimization.
Proactive Risk Management: With a comprehensive view of the supply chain, the firm can develop risk mitigation strategies, such as diversifying suppliers, increasing safety stock, or enhancing communication channels.
'The Supply Chain Risk Management Guide' by James B. Rice Jr. and Craig A. Zsidisin
APICS, 'Risk Management in the Supply Chain'
Question 187
An organization is partnering with a supplier. The most appropriate tool to ensure that the supplier has the necessary capabilities is:
Explanation:
Partnering with a supplier requires ensuring that the supplier has the necessary capabilities. The most appropriate tool for this is supplier certification. This process involves:
Evaluation of Capabilities: Supplier certification assesses the supplier's ability to meet quality, delivery, and cost requirements consistently.
Standard Compliance: Certification often includes verifying that the supplier complies with industry standards and best practices.
Continuous Improvement: It encourages suppliers to continuously improve their processes and performance to maintain certification.
Building Trust: Certification builds trust and reliability in the supplier's ability to deliver high-quality products and services.
'Supplier Certification: A Continuous Improvement Strategy' by Michael J. Trahan and Thomas P. Reid
APICS, 'Supplier Certification and Management'
Question 188
A company most likely would implement a supplier certification program to:
Explanation:
A company would implement a supplier certification program primarily to validate the supplier's compliance with requirements. This ensures:
Quality Assurance: The supplier consistently meets the quality standards specified by the company.
Performance Reliability: Certified suppliers are verified to have the processes and controls in place to deliver products and services reliably.
Regulatory Compliance: Certification checks that suppliers adhere to relevant regulations and industry standards.
Risk Mitigation: By validating compliance, the company reduces the risk of disruptions due to supplier issues.
'Supplier Evaluation and Performance Excellence' by Sherry Gordon
APICS, 'Supplier Certification Programs'
Question 189
Supplier certification procedures verify that a supplier:
Explanation:
Supplier certification procedures verify that a supplier implements, documents, and improves procedures related to customer requirements. This involves:
Procedure Implementation: Ensuring that suppliers have the necessary procedures in place to meet customer specifications.
Documentation: Verifying that these procedures are well-documented and followed consistently.
Continuous Improvement: Checking that suppliers have mechanisms for continuous improvement to adapt to changing requirements and enhance performance.
Customer Focus: Confirming that the supplier's processes are aligned with and responsive to customer needs and expectations.
'Supplier Certification: A Continuous Improvement Strategy' by Michael J. Trahan and Thomas P. Reid
APICS, 'Supplier Management and Certification'
Question 190
A large bicycle company has outsourced manufacturing and needs to respond immediately to any logistics problems in the supply chain. The best technological solution to meet this need is:
Explanation:
For a large bicycle company that has outsourced manufacturing and needs to respond immediately to any logistics problems in the supply chain, the best technological solution is supply chain event management (SCEM). This involves:
Real-Time Monitoring: SCEM provides real-time visibility into the entire supply chain, allowing the company to monitor the status of shipments, inventory levels, and other key metrics.
Event Detection and Alerts: It can detect deviations from the plan, such as delays, shortages, or quality issues, and trigger alerts to the relevant stakeholders.
Proactive Response: With SCEM, the company can respond proactively to logistics problems, mitigating their impact on the supply chain and ensuring timely resolution.
Enhanced Communication: SCEM improves communication and coordination among supply chain partners, facilitating quick and effective problem-solving.
'Supply Chain Event Management: Concepts, Capabilities, and Implementation' by Christoph Kilger and Hartmut Meyr
APICS, 'Supply Chain Event Management Systems Overview'
Question