APICS CSCP Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 4

Holding inventory as a way to balance supply and demand involves stockpiling products in anticipation of future demand. For seasonal products, manufacturers often build up inventory before the peak selling period to ensure they can meet the increased demand during that time. This approach helps maintain a consistent production schedule and avoids potential stockouts or production bottlenecks during high-demand periods. By doing so, manufacturers can better align their supply capabilities with market demand fluctuations.

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson.

Cachon, G., & Terwiesch, C. (2013). Matching Supply with Demand: An Introduction to Operations Management. McGraw-Hill Education.

To calculate the cost savings from increasing inventory turns, we first need to determine the current inventory level and the inventory carrying cost.

Calculate the average inventory level:

Current inventory turns = 4

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) = $350 million

Average inventory = COGS / Inventory turns = $350 million / 4 = $87.5 million

Calculate the inventory carrying cost:

Inventory carrying cost rate = 18%

Current carrying cost = $87.5 million * 18% = $15.75 million

Calculate the new inventory level with increased turns:

New inventory turns = 6

New average inventory = COGS / New inventory turns = $350 million / 6 = $58.33 million

Calculate the new inventory carrying cost:

New carrying cost = $58.33 million * 18% = $10.5 million

Determine the cost savings:

Cost savings = Current carrying cost - New carrying cost = $15.75 million - $10.5 million = $5.25 million per turn

Since inventory turns increase from 4 to 6 (an increase of 2 turns), total savings:

Total cost savings = $5.25 million * 2 = $29 million

Thus, the cost savings from increasing inventory turns from four to six would be $29,000,000.

Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Novack, R. A., & Gibson, B. J. (2016). Supply Chain Management: A Logistics Perspective. Cengage Learning.

Stevenson, W. J. (2018). Operations Management. McGraw-Hill Education.

Continuous improvement, often referred to as Kaizen, focuses on making small, incremental changes to processes with the goal of improving efficiency and quality. Here's a breakdown of why option A is correct:

Never-ending effort to expose and eliminate root causes of problems: Continuous improvement is an ongoing process that seeks to identify and address the fundamental causes of inefficiencies and issues.

Management effort to reduce cycle time: While reducing cycle time is a component of continuous improvement, the primary focus is on identifying root causes.

Big-step improvements: Continuous improvement typically involves small, incremental changes rather than large, radical changes.

Supplier replenishment: This describes a vendor-managed inventory system, not the essence of continuous improvement. Thus, the best description of continuous improvement is a never-ending effort to expose and eliminate root causes of problems.

Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The Key to Japan's Competitive Success.

Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer.

When making a make-or-buy decision, several factors must be considered beyond costs and proprietary knowledge. The option to 'make' implies manufacturing the product in-house, while 'buy' means outsourcing the production. Key considerations include:

Costs: Both fixed and variable costs associated with in-house production versus purchasing from a supplier.

Proprietary Knowledge: The importance of keeping certain knowledge and technologies within the company for competitive advantage.

Available Capacity: Whether the company has the necessary production capacity to manufacture the product without affecting other operations. This involves assessing current production capabilities and future scalability.

Quality Control: The ability to maintain the desired level of quality in-house versus the quality assurance capabilities of potential suppliers.

Flexibility and Lead Time: The ability to respond quickly to market changes and customer demands.

Strategic Importance: How critical the component or product is to the company's core business and strategic goals.

Among the given options, 'available capacity' is the most relevant factor, as it directly influences the decision of whether to allocate internal resources to production or to outsource.

Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson.

Slack, N., & Lewis, M. (2017). Operations Strategy. Pearson.

Using an independent service provider for logistics can be highly beneficial under certain circumstances. Here's a breakdown of when this is most appropriate:

Market Penetration: A shoe company aiming to enter a foreign market would benefit from an independent logistics provider's local expertise, established networks, and infrastructure, reducing the complexity and cost of setting up its own logistics operations.

Global Reach: Independent providers often have a global reach and can offer efficient and reliable services that would be costly and time-consuming for a company to develop internally.

Scalability and Flexibility: These providers offer scalability and flexibility in logistics operations, allowing the shoe company to adapt quickly to market demand changes without investing heavily in logistics assets.

Focus on Core Competencies: By outsourcing logistics, the shoe company can focus on its core competencies such as design, production, and marketing, rather than the intricacies of international logistics.

Other scenarios such as a business with global plants and warehouses might already have the infrastructure needed, making an independent provider less necessary. For a financial services company or a cable television company, logistics is not a core function, and thus the question of outsourcing logistics is less pertinent.

Langley, J., & Capgemini. (2019). Third-Party Logistics Study: The State of Logistics Outsourcing.

Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Novack, R. A., & Gibson, B. J. (2017). Supply Chain Management: A Logistics Perspective. Cengage Learning.

Implementing a collaborative transportation management system (TMS) offers several benefits by improving coordination and visibility across the supply chain. The most likely benefit includes:

Less Variability in Transportation Costs: A collaborative TMS provides enhanced data sharing and real-time information, allowing for better planning and execution. This results in more predictable transportation costs through optimized routing, load consolidation, and efficient carrier selection.

Enhanced Coordination: Improved communication between all parties involved in the transportation process reduces inefficiencies and helps in achieving economies of scale.

Cost Savings: By minimizing empty miles and improving route planning, a TMS can significantly reduce fuel consumption and overall transportation expenses.

Improved Service Levels: Better visibility and coordination lead to timely deliveries, enhancing customer satisfaction.

Analytics and Reporting: Advanced analytics capabilities help in monitoring performance, identifying cost-saving opportunities, and making informed decisions.

While benefits such as lower distribution center operating costs, fewer transportation planners, and less variability in picking and packing time might occur indirectly, the most direct and significant benefit is the reduction in transportation cost variability.

Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Novack, R. A., & Gibson, B. J. (2017). Supply Chain Management: A Logistics Perspective. Cengage Learning.

Frazelle, E. (2002). Supply Chain Strategy: The Logistics of Supply Chain Management. McGraw-Hill.

Reverse logistics involves the process of moving goods from their final destination back to the manufacturer or into the supply chain for the purpose of returns, repair, remanufacturing, recycling, or disposal. This process is inherently more complex than outbound logistics for several reasons:

Variable Lead Times: Unlike outbound logistics where shipments are more predictable and scheduled, reverse logistics often deals with irregular and unpredictable return flows. Products may come back sporadically, leading to highly variable lead times.

Non-Uniform Packages: Returned items often vary in size, condition, and packaging, making handling and processing more complicated.

Quality and Condition: The quality and condition of returned items are inconsistent, requiring inspection and potential reprocessing or disposal.

Regulatory Compliance: There may be more regulations to consider, especially regarding disposal and recycling of products.

Customer Interaction: Managing customer returns requires effective communication and service management to ensure customer satisfaction.

Among these complexities, the most significant is the variability in lead times for shipments, as it directly impacts the planning and efficiency of reverse logistics operations.

Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. (2001). 'An Examination of Reverse Logistics Practices.' Journal of Business Logistics.

Stock, J. R., & Lambert, D. M. (2001). Strategic Logistics Management. McGraw-Hill.

A remanufacturer of equipment typically engages in reverse logistics. This type of supply chain involves the processes associated with the return of products for the purpose of capturing value or proper disposal. Key elements include:

Product Returns: Managing the return of used products from customers.

Inspection and Sorting: Evaluating the condition of returned items to determine if they can be reused, remanufactured, or recycled.

Remanufacturing Process: Disassembling, cleaning, repairing, and reassembling products to return them to like-new condition.

Recycling and Disposal: Ensuring environmentally responsible disposal of non-reusable parts and materials.

Reverse logistics is essential for remanufacturers to recover and reuse materials, reduce waste

, and enhance sustainability.

Guide Jr, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2002). 'The reverse supply chain.' Harvard Business Review.

Srivastava, S. K. (2008). 'Network design for reverse logistics.' Omega.

=========================

The firm's strategy of losing customers who do not value its unique offerings and focusing on those who do is aligned with creating a more loyal customer base. Here's why:

Customer Alignment: By targeting customers who appreciate and value its unique products and services, the firm aligns its offerings with customer needs and expectations.

Enhanced Customer Satisfaction: Focusing on customers who genuinely value the firm's offerings leads to higher satisfaction, as these customers are more likely to be pleased with the product quality, features, and service.

Customer Loyalty: Satisfied customers are more likely to become repeat buyers, advocate for the brand, and exhibit higher loyalty.

Resource Allocation: By shedding non-aligned customers, the firm can better allocate resources to serve and retain the most valuable customers, leading to a stronger, more loyal customer base.

This strategic approach helps the firm in building a loyal customer base that is less price-sensitive and more committed to the brand.

Kumar, V., & Shah, D. (2004). 'Building and sustaining profitable customer loyalty for the 21st century.' Journal of Retailing.

Reichheld, F. F. (2001). 'Loyalty Rules! How Today's Leaders Build Lasting Relationships.' Harvard Business School Press.