Salesforce Certified Strategy Designer Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 7

The best focus for testing efforts to determine whether to produce a product at scale is desirability, viability, and feasibility, which are the three key dimensions of design thinking that evaluate whether a product is desirable for users, viable for business, and feasible for technology. Novelty, privacy, and potential to go viral or competitive advantage, impact, and own ability are not comprehensive enough to cover all aspects of design thinking.

The best method to improve feasibility of a concept direction that involves sustainable materials is to run a cost benefit analysis, which is a quantitative way of comparing the costs and benefits of different alternatives and finding the optimal solution. Creating a functional prototype or reviewing and aligning with company V2MOM may not address the feasibility issue directly.

The best thing to include in the executive summary when presenting a new service vision to an executive audience is a plan description including who needs to act and what they need to do, as this provides a clear and concise overview of the vision and its implementation. A detailed report of the data that informed the new vision or the different options explored in the process of designing this vision may not be relevant or interesting for an executive audience.

The best thing to do to test a How Might We statement to ensure it successfully guides the design process is to use rapid ideation with the project team, as this helps generate and evaluate multiple ideas that address the design challenge and reveal any gaps or assumptions in the statement. Testing the statement with end users or launching an online survey may not be effective or feasible ways to test a How Might We statement, as they are more suitable for testing solutions or gathering feedback.

A business case for sustainable innovation should demonstrate how the product creates value for both the company and the customers throughout its lifecycle, from pre-purchase to post-purchase. Extending customer journey maps to include these stages can help identify opportunities and challenges for enhancing the product experience and reducing environmental impact. Purchasing carbon offsets or sourcing cheaper materials may reduce some costs or emissions, but they do not address the full product lifecycle or the customer perspective.

A CX vision is a statement that describes the desired future state of the customer experience. It should be inspiring, aspirational, and feasible. To alleviate stakeholders' concerns about how it will impact the current product, a strategy designer should prototype an aspect of the vision that interacts with the current product and share insights with stakeholders. This can help them visualize and understand how the vision can be realized and what benefits it can bring. A brainstorming session may not be helpful if the stakeholders are already skeptical about the vision. Sharing objectives and key results may provide some context, but they do not show how the vision will affect the product.

A strategy designer should counsel leadership in consideration of ethical implications for both the company and its patients by facilitating a Consequence Scanning workshop before proceeding with any further investment. A Consequence Scanning workshop is a method to identify and mitigate potential negative consequences of a product or service, such as privacy, security, or social issues. It involves mapping out the intended and unintended outcomes of the product or service, assessing their likelihood and severity, and devising actions to prevent or reduce harm. Performing user research or researching similar organizations may provide some insights, but they do not address the ethical implications in a systematic and proactive way.

The purpose of an Impact & Effort matrix is to prioritize projects based on key goals outlined in project framing. An Impact & Effort matrix is a tool to evaluate and compare projects based on two criteria: the impact they have on achieving the desired outcomes, and the effort they require to implement. Projects that have high impact and low effort are usually prioritized, while projects that have low impact and high effort are usually deprioritized. An Impact & Effort matrix does not compare products based on predefined criteria or classify projects according to their level of urgency.

The strategy designer should conduct an expert interview in consumer device engineering to determine whether or not to pursue this product idea. An expert interview is a way to gather information and insights from someone who has specialized knowledge or experience in a relevant domain. It can help validate assumptions, identify risks, and explore opportunities for innovation. Performing secondary research may not provide enough depth or specificity for this product idea. Hiring an engineer may be premature and costly at this stage.