Cisco 300-410 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 19
Question list
List of questions
Related questions
Refer to Exhibit.
A network administrator added one router in the Cisco DNA Center and checked its discovery and health from the Network Health Dashboard. The network administrator observed that the router is still showing up as unmonitored. What must be configured on the router to mount it in the Cisco DNA Center?
Configure router with NetFlow data
Configure router with the telemetry data
Configure router with routing to reach Cisco DNA Center
Configure router with SNMPv2c or SNMPv3 traps
Exhibit:
NTP is configured across the network infrastructure and Cisco DNA Center. An NTP issue was reported on the Cisco DNA Center at 17:15. Which action resolves the issue?
Check and resolve reachability between the WLC and the NTP server
Reset the NTP server to resolve any synchronization issues tor all devices
Check and resolve reachability between Cisco DNA Center and the NTP server
Check and configure NTP on the WLC and synchronize with Cisco DNA Center
Refer to Exhibit.
A network administrator enables DHCP snooping on the Cisco Catalyst 3750-X switch and configures the uplink port (Port-channel2) as a trusted port. Clients are not receiving an IP address, but when DHCP snooping is disabled, clients start receiving IP addresses. Which global command resolves the issue?
No ip dhcp snooping information option
ip dhcp snooping
ip dhcp relay information trust portchannel2
ip dhcp snooping trust
Which configuration feature should be used to block rogue router advertisements instead of using the IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard feature?
VACL blocking broadcast frames from nonauthorized hosts
PVLANs with promiscuous ports associated to route advertisements and isolated ports for nodes
PVLANs with community ports associated to route advertisements and isolated ports for nodes
IPv4 ACL blocking route advertisements from nonauthorized hosts
Refer to Exhibit:
AS 111 wanted to use AS 200 as the preferred path for 172.20.5.0/24 and AS 100 as the backup. After the configuration, AS 100 is not used for any other routes. Which configuration resolves the issue?
route-mmap SETLP permit 10 match ip address prefix-list PLIST1 set local-preference 99 route-map SETLP permit 20
route-map SETLP permit 10 match ip address prefix-list PLIST1 set local-preference 110 route-map SETLP permit 20
router bgp 111 no neighbor 192.168.10.1 route-map SETLP in neighbor 192.168.10.1 route-map SETLP out
router bap 111 no neighbor 192.168.10.1 route-map SETLP in neighbor 192.168.20.2 route-map SE TLP in
Refer to the exhibit.
The Math and Science departments connect through the corporate. IT router but users in the Math department must not be able to reach the Science department and vice versa Which configuration accomplishes this task?
vrf definition Science
!
interface E 0/2
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
!
interface E 0/3
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
vrf definition Science
address-family ipv4
!
nterface E 0/2
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
vrf forwarding Science
no shut
!i
nterface E 0/3
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
vrf forwarding Science
no shut
vrf definition Science
address-family ipv4
!i
nterface E 0/2
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
!i
nterface E 0/3
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
vrf definition Science
address-family ipv4
!i
nterface E 0/2
vrf forwarding Science
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut
!i
nterface E 0/3
vrf forwarding Science
ip address 192.168.2.1
An engineer configured Reverse Path Forwarding on an interface and noticed that the routes are dropped when a route lookup fails on that interface for a prefix that is available in the routing table Which interface configuration resolves the issue?
ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx
ip verify unicast source reachable-via any
ip verify unicast source reachable-via allow-default
ip verify unicast source reachable-via 12-src
Refer to the exhibit.
The neighbor relationship is not coming up Which two configurations bring the adjacency up?
(Choose two)
NY router ospf 1 area 0 authentication message-digest
LA interface E 0/0 ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 Cisco123
NY interface E 0/0 no ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 Cisco123 ip ospf authentication-key Cisco123
LA interface E 0/0 ip ospf authentication-key Cisco123
LA router ospf 1 area 0 authentication message-digest
Refer to the exhibit.
SanFrancisco and Boston routers are choosing slower links to reach each other despite the direct links being up Which configuration fixes the issue?
Option A
Option B
Option C
Option D
Refer to the exhibit.
A network administrator logs into the router using TACACS+ username and password credentials, but the administrator cannot run any privileged commands Which action resolves the issue?
Configure TACACS+ synchronization with the Active Directory admin group
Configure the username from a local database
Configure full access for the username from TACACS+ server
Configure an authorized IP address for this user to access this router
Question