ExamGecko
Search Search Login
Home Home / Cisco / 300-410

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test - Questions Answers, Page 39

Question list
Search
Search
Open VPLUS File
Convert VPLUS to PDF

Related questions

Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit. R1 uses SP1 as the primary path. A network engineer must force all SSH traffic generated from R1 toward SP2. Which configuration accomplishes the task?
LAB SIMULATION WAN CORE MGMT
Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit After an engineer modified the configuration for area 7 to permit type 1 2 and 7 LSAs only users connected to router R9 reported that they could no longer access the internet. Which configuration restores internet access to users on R9 and permits only LSA type 1,2, and 7? A) B) C) D)
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is trying to block the route to 192.168.2.2 from the routing table by using the configuration that is shown. The route is still present in the routing table as an OSPF route. Which action blocks the route?
Refer to the exhibit. Users in the branch network of 2001:db8:0:4::/64 report that they cannot access the Internet. Which command is issued in IPv6 router EIGRP 100 configuration mode to solve this issue?
Refer to the exhibit. Refer to the exhibit. Which configuration resolves the issue? A) B) C) D)
Refer to the exhibit. An administrator must configure the router with OSPF for IPv4 and IPv6 networks under a single process. The OSPF adjacencies are not established and did not meet the requirement. Which action resolves the issue?
An engineer configured a router with this configuration ip access-hst DENY TELNET 10 deny tcp any any eq 23 log-input The router console starts receiving log message :%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list DENY_TELNET denied tcp 192.168.1.10(1022)(FastEthernet1/0 D508.89gb.003f) ->192.168.2.20(23), 1 packet" Which action stops messages on the console while still denying Telnet?
Refer to the exhibit. R2 is a route reflector, and R1 and R3 are route reflector clients. The route reflector learns the route to 172.16.25.0/24 from R1, but it does not advertise to R3. What is the reason the route is not advertised?
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer configures a static route on a router, but when the engineer checks the route to the destination, a different next hop is chosen. What is the reason for this?

Question 381

Report
Export
Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer configured SNMP CommÓmes on UserSW2 switch, but the SNMP server cannot upload modified configurations to the switch. Which configuration resolves this issue?

A.

snmp-server community Ciscowruser RW 11

A.

snmp-server community Ciscowruser RW 11

Answers
B.

snmp-server group NETADMIN v3 priv read NETVIEW write NETADMIN access 22

B.

snmp-server group NETADMIN v3 priv read NETVIEW write NETADMIN access 22

Answers
C.

snmp-server community CiscOUs3r RW 11

C.

snmp-server community CiscOUs3r RW 11

Answers
D.

snmp-server group NETVIEW v2c priv read NETVIEW access 11

D.

snmp-server group NETVIEW v2c priv read NETVIEW access 11

Answers
Suggested answer: A

Question 382

Report
Export
Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit The remote branch locations have a static neighbor relationship configured to R1 only R1 has successful neighbor relationships with the remote locations of R2 and R3, but the end users cannot communicate with each other. Which configuration resolves the issueí

A.

Option A

A.

Option A

Answers
B.

Option B

B.

Option B

Answers
C.

Option C

C.

Option C

Answers
D.

Option D

D.

Option D

Answers
E.

Option E

E.

Option E

Answers
Suggested answer: E

Question 383

Report
Export
Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. The authentication is not working as desired and the user drops into user-exec mode. Which configuration resolves the issue?

A.

Option A

A.

Option A

Answers
B.

Option B

B.

Option B

Answers
C.

Option C

C.

Option C

Answers
D.

Option D

D.

Option D

Answers
Suggested answer: C

Question 384

Report
Export
Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer configured SNMP traps to record spoofed packets drop of more than 48000 a minute on the ethernet0/0 interlace. During an IP spoofing attack, the engineer noticed that no notifications have been received by the SNMP server. Which configuration resolves the issue on R1?

A.

ip verity unicast notification threshold 48000

A.

ip verity unicast notification threshold 48000

Answers
B.

ip verify unicast notification threshold 8000

B.

ip verify unicast notification threshold 8000

Answers
C.

ip verify unicast notification threshold 800

C.

ip verify unicast notification threshold 800

Answers
D.

ip verify unicast notification threshold 80

D.

ip verify unicast notification threshold 80

Answers
Suggested answer: C

Question 385

Report
Export
Collapse

LAB SIMULATION

Configure individual VRFs for each customer according to the topology to achieve these goals :

R1

R2

SW1

SW2

SW3


A.

See the solution below in

A.

See the solution below in

Answers
Suggested answer: A

Explanation:

Solution:

Use cu-red under interfaces facing SW1 & SW3:

On R1:

interface Ethernet0/0 ip vrf forwarding cu-red

ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0

Check reachability to SW1:

R1#ping vrf cu-red 192.168.1.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.2.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms

On R2:

interface Ethernet0/0 ip vrf forwarding cu-red ip address 192.168.2.254 255.255.255.0

Check reachability to SW3:

R2#ping vrf cu-red 192.168.2.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Use vrf cu-green for SW2 & SW4:

On R1:

interface Ethernet0/1 ip vrf forwarding cu-green

ip address 192.168.20.254 255.255.255.0

Test reachability to SW2:

R1#ping vrf cu-green 192.168.20.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.22.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms

On R2:

interface Ethernet0/1 ip vrf forwarding cu-green

ip address 192.168.22.254 255.255.255.0

Test reachability to SW4:

R2#ping vrf cu-green 192.168.22.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms

On R1:

interface Ethernet0/2.100 mpls ip

!i nterface Ethernet0/2.200 mpls ip

!

Configure BGP:

router bgp 65000 neighbor 10.10.10.2 remote-as 65000 neighbor 10.10.20.2 remote-as 65000

! address-family vpnv4 neighbor 10.10.10.2 activate neighbor 10.10.20.2 activate exit-address-family

! address-family ipv4 vrf cu-green redistribute connected exit-address-family

! address-family ipv4 vrf cu-red redistribute connected exit-address-family

!

R1(config)#ip vrf cu-red

R1(config-vrf)#route-target both 65000:100

!

R1(config)#ip vrf cu-green

R1(config-vrf)#route-target both 65000:200

On R2: interface Ethernet0/2.100 mpls ip

!i nterface Ethernet0/2.200 mpls ip

! router bgp 65000 neighbor 10.10.10.1 remote-as 65000 neighbor 10.10.20.1 remote-as 65000

! address-family vpnv4 neighbor 10.10.10.1 activate neighbor 10.10.20.1 activate exit-address-family

! address-family ipv4 vrf cu-green redistribute connected exit-address-family

! address-family ipv4 vrf cu-red redistribute connected exit-address-family

R2(config)#ip vrf cu-red

R2(config-vrf)#route-target both 65000:100

!

R2(config)#ip vrf cu-green

R2(config-vrf)#route-target both 65000:200

Verification:

From SW1 to SW3:

SW1#ping 192.168.1.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms

But canít Reach SW2 or SW4 in VRF cu-green:

SW1#ping 192.168.22.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.22.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

U.U.U

Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

SW1#ping 192.168.20.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

U.U.U

Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

Same Test for SW2:

From SW2 to SW4:

SW2#ping 192.168.20.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms

But canít Reach SW3 or SW1 in VRF cu-red:

SW2#ping 192.168.1.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

U.U.U

Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

SW2#ping 192.168.2.1

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.2.1, timeout is 2 seconds:

U.U.U

Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)

Both R1 & R2 has separate tables for VRFs cu-red and cu-green.

Question 386

Report
Export
Collapse

LAB SIMULATION

WAN

CORE

MGMT

A.

See the solution below in

A.

See the solution below in

Answers
Suggested answer: A

Explanation:

CORE policy-mao CoPP class CoPP-CRITICAL police 1000000 50000 50000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit

CORE# Copy run start

TESTING: -

CORE

MGMT

Question 387

Report
Export
Collapse

Refer to the exhibit.

R4

R5

A.

See the solution below in .

A.

See the solution below in .

Answers
Suggested answer: A

Explanation:

solution below in .

Explanation:

R4

Int range et0/0 ñ 1

Ip ospf authentication message-digest

Ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 CCNP

Router ospf 1

Redistribute connected subnets route-map to-ospf metric-type 1

Copy run start

R5

Int range et0/0 ñ 1

Ip ospf authentication message-digest

Ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 CCNP

Interface eth 0/1

Ip ospf cost 10

Copy run start

VERIFICATION:-

Question 388

Report
Export
Collapse

DRAG DROP

Drag and drop the ICMPv6 neighbor discovery messages from the left onto the correct packet types on the right.


Question 388
Correct answer: Question 388

Explanation:

Question 389

Report
Export
Collapse

DRAG DROP

Drag and drop the descriptions from the left onto the corresponding MPLS components on the right.


Question 389
Correct answer: Question 389

Question 390

Report
Export
Collapse

What are two characteristics of a VRF instance? (Choose two)

A.

It is defined by the VPN membership of a customer site attached to a P device.

A.

It is defined by the VPN membership of a customer site attached to a P device.

Answers
B.

Each VRF has a different set of routing and CEF tables.

B.

Each VRF has a different set of routing and CEF tables.

Answers
C.

AII VRFS share customers routing and CEF tables.

C.

AII VRFS share customers routing and CEF tables.

Answers
D.

An interface must be associated to one VRF

D.

An interface must be associated to one VRF

Answers
E.

A customer site can be associated to different VRFs.

E.

A customer site can be associated to different VRFs.

Answers
Suggested answer: B, D
Total 570 questions
Go to page: of 57
ExamGecko

Copyright @2023 ExamGecko | All right reserved

Mail us: [email protected]
About us
Contact us
Twitter X
Facebook
Medium
Convert VPLUS to PDF
Open VPLUS files Easily and Quickly
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Terms